Mr. Asthma

Question:

Re Flawed Vacuum Cleaners. Since first posting this subject we have produce a small Video Clip to demonstrate just how efficient the Air Recycling Cleaner, is. See  http://www.edginton.info/arc The original posting said, The Vacuum Cleaners we use have many major flaws. 1/. They release contaminated air back into the home environment. 2/. They blow dust from furniture allowing it to become air born. 3/. They needlessly waste large amounts energy.  The 22 million cleaners used in the UK waste almost all the power taken from UK Wind Farms. 4/. They are noisy and smelly. An alternative to the Vacuum Cleaner exists and has undergone over ten years of testing. But because of the reluctance of cleaner manufacturers to change their designs, I now call for others to help me to impress their Governments on the importance of this project and to spread the information. More information about the "Air Recycling Cleaner" can and be found at, http://www.edginton.info/project1 http://www.edginton.info/cafc Ben Edginton An Extract from information on the Home page "High-efficiency particulate arrest-filter vacuum cleaners increase personal cat allergen exposure in homes with cats." North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK

Response:

… > But because of the reluctance of cleaner manufacturers to change their > designs, I now call for others to help me to impress their Governments on > the importance of this project and to spread the information.

… If you’ve got a better mouse trap then the world will beat it’s own path to your door. If all you have is hogwash then no amount of Government force is going to get people to swallow it. People with good products don’t need the government to impress people. Anthony

Response:

> … > But because of the reluctance of cleaner manufacturers to change their > designs, I now call for others to help me to impress their Governments on > the importance of this project and to spread the information. > … > If you’ve got a better mouse trap then the world will beat it’s own > path to your door. If all you have is hogwash then no amount of > Government force is going to get people to swallow it. People with > good products don’t need the government to impress people. > Anthony

That is not what Thomas Edison thought Anthony Below is an extract from his book. Quotes from, Edison, His Life And Inventions. There are three stages in all great inventions: The first, in which people said the thing could not be done; The second, in which they said anybody could do it; And the third, in which they said it had always been done by everybody. One of the greatest delusions of the public in regard to any notable invention is the belief that the world is waiting for it with open arms and an eager welcome. The exact contrary is the truth. There is not a single new art or device the world has ever enjoyed of which it can be said that it was given an immediate and enthusiastic reception. The way of the inventor is hard. He can sometimes raise capital to help him in working out his crude conceptions, but even then it is frequently done at a distressful cost of personal surrender. When the result is achieved the invention makes its appeal on the score of economy of material or of effort; and then “labor” often  awaits with crushing and tyrannical spirit to smash the apparatus or forbid its very use. Where both capital and labor are agreed that the object is worthy of encouragement, there is still the supreme indifference of the public to overcome, and the stubborn resistance of pre-existing devices to combat. The years of hardship and struggle are thus prolonged, the chagrin of poverty and neglect too frequently embitters the inventor’s scanty bread; and one great spirit after another has succumbed to the defeat beyond which lay the procrastinated triumph so dearly earned. Even in America, where the adoption of improvements and innovations is regarded as so prompt and sure, and where the huge tolls of the Patent Office and the courts bear witness to the ceaseless efforts of the inventor, it is impossible to deny the sad truth that unconsciously society discourages invention rather than invites it Re Flawed Vacuum Cleaners. Since first posting this subject we have produce a small Video Clip in order to demonstrate just how efficiently the Air Recycling Cleaner will perform. See  http://www.edginton.info/arc The original posting said, The Vacuum Cleaners we use have many major flaws. 1/. They release contaminated air back into the home environment. 2/. They blow dust from furniture allowing it to become air born. 3/. They needlessly waste large amounts energy.  The 22 million cleaners used in the UK waste almost all the power taken from UK Wind Farms. 4/. They are noisy and smelly. An alternative to the Vacuum Cleaner exists and has undergone over ten years of testing. But because of the reluctance of cleaner manufacturers to change their designs, I now call for others to help me to impress their Governments on the importance of this project and to spread the information. More information about the "Air Recycling Cleaner" can and be found at, http://www.edginton.info/project1 http://www.edginton.info/cafc Ben Edginton An Extract from information on the Home page "High-efficiency particulate arrest-filter vacuum cleaners increase personal cat allergen exposure in homes with cats." North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>But because of the reluctance of cleaner manufacturers to change their >>designs, I now call for others to help me to impress their Governments >> on >>the importance of this project and to spread the information. >If you’ve got a better mouse trap then the world will beat it’s own >path to your door. If all you have is hogwash then no amount of >Government force is going to get people to swallow it. People with >good products don’t need the government to impress people. > That is not what Thomas Edison thought Anthony Below is an extract from his > book. > There are three stages in all great inventions: > The first, in which people said the thing could not be done; > The second, in which they said anybody could do it; > And the third, in which they said it had always been done by everybody.

… Nowhere in that quote does he say "The Government must force people to pay for it." You are asking people to convince government leaders to embrace your invention and therefor force it upon an unwilling populace. If your invention was any good then you wouldn’t need guys with guns to force people to buy it. Anthony

Response:

>Nowhere in that quote does he say "The Government must force people >to pay for it." You are asking people to convince government leaders >to embrace your invention and therefor force it upon an unwilling >populace. If your invention was any good then you wouldn’t need guys >with guns to force people to buy it.

He’s trying to get a free ride off asthma and allergies for his low-power suckuvac. It’s all about the power. The system has flaws of fact vs his glowing theory of evolutionary vacuum science. S —

Response: