Categories: Exercise Asthma

Question:

 Well, I sure hope, if you have to have something wrong, it is amenable to correction without adding more "junk" to your medications list… oh, yes, I do recall  mention of the autonomic nervous system… just that breathing/lungs were never specified as one of the areas. What an interesting site!! and thanks for the reply.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> If you find any relationship between neuropathy of a particular kind > (especially of the lungs and breathing…diaphragm) I hope you will post > it. > Other than the "chest wall pain" someone mentioned a week or so ago, and > also the asthma or other lung reaction to GERD reflux material being > aspirated during sleep, (if GERD, itself can be closely linked to diabetes > and neuropathy, I don’t know, but really suspect it in my family), I > haven’t > heard any claims about the lungs and neuropathy.  However,  it stands to > reason that where blood vessels get very small, there would be  damage in > cases of high bg and BP–as in the kidneys, for example. > I will keep you posted as I learn new things.  Actually, the test I had done > was supposed to check for heart damage.  But the test involved breathing > into a tube in various ways.  It is a fairly new test and I don’t think it > is widely available.  And since it is so new, that is why they didn’t know > exactly what my results meant.  All they knew was that my breathing pattern > was abnormal.  I remember when I first took the test, the lady said I was > breathing too deeply and it would have to be done over.  Then the next time, > my breaths were too shallow.  The third time the machine registered that I > took an extra breath.  But I swear I didn’t!  I left there thinking that > either the woman who gave me the test didn’t know what she was doing, or > that the equipment might have been faulty.  Then again, they had me lie down > on a rickety, broken old table and it was very uncomfortable.  And part of > the test invloved having a painful plastic clip over my nostrils that > prevented me from getting any air that way.  All in all, not a fun test! If > you want to read about it, here is the website: > http://www.anscore.com/ > I just don’t hear anyone mention it. > I hadn’t heard anyone mention it either.  But I do know that now I sometimes > get winded for no apparent reason at all.  Then again, I do have other > healthy problems and this might not even be related to the diabetes. > I have one diabetic aunt in her mid 80’s who has suffered pain in her > chest > for many years, and now blood clots from her neuropathic legs get > plastered > all over her lungs and cause untold but apparently partly reversible > damage > there, while putting an immense strain on her heart, which then must pump > all the harder to oxygenate the brain.  Her sister, in her middle 80’s has > an honestly earned case of emphysema, no (or very little) neuropathy/blood > clots in her legs. > Hmmm…  I haven’t had chest pain.  But at one point, I had  developed a > rapid heartbeat.  I didn’t even know it.  My Endo. discovered it on a > routine visit.  He thought it might be caused by one of my meds.  So he > pulled me  off  of all of them that might possibly cause it.  I felt much > better after all that stuff got out of my system. > — > Type 2 > http://www.redshift.com/~juliebove/

Response:

spent a lot of time and effort in controlling the A1c’s…… my present #’s don’t please me, but we can’t all live at 5.5 for ever keep you bg readings down….. this is our only defence against complications….. — k t1 14 yr

Janet I just got the willies from your post. What is the inevitable, insulin or amputation.  I was under the impression that I coud live a full and normal life if I kept my bgs under control.  Is that a wrong assumption.  Am I destined for dialysis blindness, amputation or insulin,no matter what I do.  If so I want to go out a happy camper.

Response:

> If you find any relationship between neuropathy of a particular kind > (especially of the lungs and breathing…diaphragm) I hope you will post it. > Other than the "chest wall pain" someone mentioned a week or so ago, and > also the asthma or other lung reaction to GERD reflux material being > aspirated during sleep, (if GERD, itself can be closely linked to diabetes > and neuropathy, I don’t know, but really suspect it in my family), I haven’t > heard any claims about the lungs and neuropathy.  However,  it stands to > reason that where blood vessels get very small, there would be  damage in > cases of high bg and BP–as in the kidneys, for example.

I will keep you posted as I learn new things.  Actually, the test I had done was supposed to check for heart damage.  But the test involved breathing into a tube in various ways.  It is a fairly new test and I don’t think it is widely available.  And since it is so new, that is why they didn’t know exactly what my results meant.  All they knew was that my breathing pattern was abnormal.  I remember when I first took the test, the lady said I was breathing too deeply and it would have to be done over.  Then the next time, my breaths were too shallow.  The third time the machine registered that I took an extra breath.  But I swear I didn’t!  I left there thinking that either the woman who gave me the test didn’t know what she was doing, or that the equipment might have been faulty.  Then again, they had me lie down on a rickety, broken old table and it was very uncomfortable.  And part of the test invloved having a painful plastic clip over my nostrils that prevented me from getting any air that way.  All in all, not a fun test!  If you want to read about it, here is the website: http://www.anscore.com/ > I just don’t hear anyone mention it.

I hadn’t heard anyone mention it either.  But I do know that now I sometimes get winded for no apparent reason at all.  Then again, I do have other healthy problems and this might not even be related to the diabetes. > I have one diabetic aunt in her mid 80’s who has suffered pain in her chest > for many years, and now blood clots from her neuropathic legs get plastered > all over her lungs and cause untold but apparently partly reversible damage > there, while putting an immense strain on her heart, which then must pump > all the harder to oxygenate the brain.  Her sister, in her middle 80’s has > an honestly earned case of emphysema, no (or very little) neuropathy/blood > clots in her legs.

Hmmm…  I haven’t had chest pain.  But at one point, I had  developed a rapid heartbeat.  I didn’t even know it.  My Endo. discovered it on a routine visit.  He thought it might be caused by one of my meds.  So he pulled me  off  of all of them that might possibly cause it.  I felt much better after all that stuff got out of my system. — Type 2 http://www.redshift.com/~juliebove/

Response:

If you find any relationship between neuropathy of a particular kind (especially of the lungs and breathing…diaphragm) I hope you will post it. Other than the "chest wall pain" someone mentioned a week or so ago, and also the asthma or other lung reaction to GERD reflux material being aspirated during sleep, (if GERD, itself can be closely linked to diabetes and neuropathy, I don’t know, but really suspect it in my family), I haven’t heard any claims about the lungs and neuropathy.  However,  it stands to reason that where blood vessels get very small, there would be  damage in cases of high bg and BP–as in the kidneys, for example. I just don’t hear anyone mention it. I have one diabetic aunt in her mid 80’s who has suffered pain in her chest for many years, and now blood clots from her neuropathic legs get plastered all over her lungs and cause untold but apparently partly reversible damage there, while putting an immense strain on her heart, which then must pump all the harder to oxygenate the brain.  Her sister, in her middle 80’s has an honestly earned case of emphysema, no (or very little) neuropathy/blood clots in her legs.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > I am not on a low carb diet.  I am following the diet given to me by the > > dietician.  It works for me.  And I am on diet and exercise alone.  I > can’t > > explain why other people don’t eat this way except perhaps that it does > not > > work for them. > Julie, from what I see of what you post here, your metabolism and > experiences are quite different from most of us.   I don’t know of anyone > else who can eat that many carbs, particularly without concern for whether > they’re complex or simple, nor do I know of anyone else who can have a > severe low without being on meds.    If I ate what you do, in spite of all > my meds and insulin, I’d be in the 200s constantly, if not higher. (This > was true even when I was unmedicated — only low, complex, carb worked for > me.) > And though I’m on meds and insulin, and my readings are between 75-120 > most > of the time, I very rarely go below 70, have only seen 59 once. > Perhaps some of your other meds have an effect on your metabolism and > insulin production? > The only other prescription meds I am taking are Synthroid for low thyroid, > Lisinopril for blood pressure, and more recently Triamterene (I think that’s > the name), a diuretic.  I do take various vitamins, minerals and supplements > such as L Carnitine, Citrimax, CLA, Flaxseed Oil and Evening Primrose Oil. > As far as I know, none of those have an effect on digestion or blood sugar. > I take some of them for the neuropathy/fibromyalgia and others to help with > fat loss/muscle gain. > I saw my Endo. yesterday and he said my Anscore test came back showing some > irregular breathing patterns.  He wasn’t sure exactly what this meant, but > that it was indicative of neuropathy.  And we’ve already established that I > have moderate neuropathy of the feet and lower legs.  His thought was that > the neuropathy was affecting my digestion, hence the lows.  I have not had > any lows in the past 2 months.  I must go back for another Anscore test and > also a treadmill test.  He said he was going to wait on that because he > didn’t think I was strong enough to do it. > I know other diabetics who follow a similar diet to me.  My brother is one. > In fact, he eats more carbs and more calories per day than I do.  And he is > sedentary for the most part.  He does take an oral med.  It’s either > Glipizide or Glyburide.  I forget which.  Sometimes I am astounded at what > he can eat.  When he goes to The Olive Garden for dinner, he eats two > helpings of salad and two bowls of Pasta Fagioli.  And his BG is fine.  I > could only eat half that much.  And he just returned from a trip to England, > France and Italy.  Hearing about all the food that he ate there made me want > to weep!  Guess we’re all different. > I also really believe that exercise is key in keeping my BG down.  I try to > do some form of it every day.  But it isn’t always easy to do with all the > health problems I have. > — > Type 2 > http://www.redshift.com/~juliebove/

Response:

For many people in the early part of the 1900’s (doncha love it? now that we’re in the 2000’s?) having diabetes was a shameful thing, as was epilepsy, any type of cancer and many others. Apparently it was regarded as some sort of weakness of character to have any of these. *?* I’ve never understood it myself. Nancy F. to discuss if they have diabetes is like – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> pulling teeth… all well and good, since they may be handling it themselves > just fine and may not want any advice or interference from "know-it-alls" > like me.  But it indicates that they may be hiding info from the rest of the > family as to the extent of diabetes in the family.  Or they may be honoring > the secretiveness of a parent who died after not controlling very well. ( > yes,  we do have a great streak of guilt and shame in our family… one > never knows what secret sins we may be hiding.   I think just being > defensive about overweight drives some into denial of more serious problems) > Even a reluctance to describe cause of death may prevent others from > conclusion, in the case, especially, where doctors are also mealy-mouthed.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I am not on a low carb diet.  I am following the diet given to me by the > dietician.  It works for me.  And I am on diet and exercise alone.  I > can’t > explain why other people don’t eat this way except perhaps that it does > not > work for them. > Julie, from what I see of what you post here, your metabolism and > experiences are quite different from most of us.   I don’t know of anyone > else who can eat that many carbs, particularly without concern for whether > they’re complex or simple, nor do I know of anyone else who can have a > severe low without being on meds.    If I ate what you do, in spite of all > my meds and insulin, I’d be in the 200s constantly, if not higher.   (This > was true even when I was unmedicated — only low, complex, carb worked for > me.) > And though I’m on meds and insulin, and my readings are between 75-120 most > of the time, I very rarely go below 70, have only seen 59 once. > Perhaps some of your other meds have an effect on your metabolism and > insulin production?

The only other prescription meds I am taking are Synthroid for low thyroid, Lisinopril for blood pressure, and more recently Triamterene (I think that’s the name), a diuretic.  I do take various vitamins, minerals and supplements such as L Carnitine, Citrimax, CLA, Flaxseed Oil and Evening Primrose Oil. As far as I know, none of those have an effect on digestion or blood sugar. I take some of them for the neuropathy/fibromyalgia and others to help with fat loss/muscle gain. I saw my Endo. yesterday and he said my Anscore test came back showing some irregular breathing patterns.  He wasn’t sure exactly what this meant, but that it was indicative of neuropathy.  And we’ve already established that I have moderate neuropathy of the feet and lower legs.  His thought was that the neuropathy was affecting my digestion, hence the lows.  I have not had any lows in the past 2 months.  I must go back for another Anscore test and also a treadmill test.  He said he was going to wait on that because he didn’t think I was strong enough to do it. I know other diabetics who follow a similar diet to me.  My brother is one. In fact, he eats more carbs and more calories per day than I do.  And he is sedentary for the most part.  He does take an oral med.  It’s either Glipizide or Glyburide.  I forget which.  Sometimes I am astounded at what he can eat.  When he goes to The Olive Garden for dinner, he eats two helpings of salad and two bowls of Pasta Fagioli.  And his BG is fine.  I could only eat half that much.  And he just returned from a trip to England, France and Italy.  Hearing about all the food that he ate there made me want to weep!  Guess we’re all different. I also really believe that exercise is key in keeping my BG down.  I try to do some form of it every day.  But it isn’t always easy to do with all the health problems I have. — Type 2 http://www.redshift.com/~juliebove/

Response:

> Even a reluctance to describe cause of death may prevent others from > conclusion, in the case, especially, where doctors are also mealy-mouthed. > I had a relative whose death certificate said heart attack, > but the doctor admitted off the record that it was actually > caused by years of too much alcohol.

 in my mother’s side of the family, between bi-polar, alcoholism, hyperglycemia. ultra sensitivity to alcohol and diabetes, I do really have some theories as to the inter-relationship of all of these, as well as strokes and heart attacks. Does years of "drinking" prevent the system from recognizing that it is really diabetic??  (does estrogen hide or delay onset of diabetes/heart attacks, etc.?) So many questions, so many untested theories…. what a fascinating disease!!!

Response:

> Even a reluctance to describe cause of death may prevent others from > conclusion, in the case, especially, where doctors are also mealy-mouthed.

I had a relative whose death certificate said heart attack, but the doctor admitted off the record that it was actually caused by years of too much alcohol. — Wes Groleau http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau

Response:

> I am not on a low carb diet.  I am following the diet given to me by the > dietician.  It works for me.  And I am on diet and exercise alone.  I can’t > explain why other people don’t eat this way except perhaps that it does not > work for them.

Julie, from what I see of what you post here, your metabolism and experiences are quite different from most of us.   I don’t know of anyone else who can eat that many carbs, particularly without concern for whether they’re complex or simple, nor do I know of anyone else who can have a severe low without being on meds.    If I ate what you do, in spite of all my meds and insulin, I’d be in the 200s constantly, if not higher.   (This was true even when I was unmedicated — only low, complex, carb worked for me.) And though I’m on meds and insulin, and my readings are between 75-120 most of the time, I very rarely go below 70, have only seen 59 once.   Perhaps some of your other meds have an effect on your metabolism and insulin production? CarolC

Response:

I often wonder if the thousands of years of types of food and the interbreeding within the "race?" "ethnic group?" (whatever) hasn’t developed a YMMV pattern. That is, my Scandanavian ancestors have given me a predisposition to one pattern of carb/protein/fat that is best for ME while my friend’s African ancestors have given him a different predispostion. Has there ever been a study of this?  I know there have been studies showing higher/lower rates of Type 2 diabetes among different ethnic groups.

Response:

I agree with Jennifer, but with this addition: The degree of complications may not be known, even if one dies at 85, after living with diabetes for decades (and under not very good control at that). Do we assume blindness accompanies old age in certain families? Trying to get relatives my age to discuss if they have diabetes is like pulling teeth… all well and good, since they may be handling it themselves just fine and may not want any advice or interference from "know-it-alls" like me.  But it indicates that they may be hiding info from the rest of the family as to the extent of diabetes in the family.  Or they may be honoring the secretiveness of a parent who died after not controlling very well. ( yes,  we do have a great streak of guilt and shame in our family… one never knows what secret sins we may be hiding.   I think just being defensive about overweight drives some into denial of more serious problems) Even a reluctance to describe cause of death may prevent others from conclusion, in the case, especially, where doctors are also mealy-mouthed. example:   Intestinal or bowel obstruction, and consequent gangrene. Of course, many cardiac and circulatory complications may be related to diabetes, so strokes and heart attacks as cause of death don’t say much.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Janet I just got the willies from your post. What is the inevitable, > insulin or amputation.  I was under the impression that I coud live a > full and normal life if I kept my bgs under control.  Is that a wrong > assumption.  Am I destined for dialysis blindness, amputation or > insulin,no matter what I do.  If so I want to go out a happy camper. > Loretta

Response:

Janet I just got the willies from your post. What is the inevitable, insulin or amputation.  I was under the impression that I coud live a full and normal life if I kept my bgs under control.  Is that a wrong assumption.  Am I destined for dialysis blindness, amputation or insulin,no matter what I do.  If so I want to go out a happy camper. Loretta Women in Afghanistan have no human rights. Please write to your Congressman and Senator requesting action against these horrors

Response:

You’re not destined Loretta… But in my two years as a diabetic, I’ve met many folks on many mailing lists, that have kept their BG tightly controlled and still got complications.  I’ve also met many who have had poor control for years and don’t have complications. There is just too much science doesn’t know.  However for me, I’ve decided that my best, if not absolute, chance for continued good health is to keep tight control.  If it doesn’t work, then at least I know I did all I could. Jennifer – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Janet I just got the willies from your post. What is the inevitable, > insulin or amputation.  I was under the impression that I coud live a > full and normal life if I kept my bgs under control.  Is that a wrong > assumption.  Am I destined for dialysis blindness, amputation or > insulin,no matter what I do.  If so I want to go out a happy camper. > Loretta > Women in Afghanistan have no human rights. Please write to your > Congressman and Senator > requesting action against these horrors

Response:

> Hi , > My name is Jeff and I live in the North East of England but originally > from London. I was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in June of this year > and have been prescribed pills and diet to help me with the diabetes. > What I find interesting is that where I live the diet I have been > recommended by my diabetic nurse and my dietitian is high in > carbohydrates and low in fats, but from the majority of postings in > this newsgroup most people seem to be on a low carbohydrate diet, does > anybody have an explanation for this or is it just the latest thing.

I am not on a low carb diet.  I am following the diet given to me by the dietician.  It works for me.  And I am on diet and exercise alone.  I can’t explain why other people don’t eat this way except perhaps that it does not work for them. — Type 2 http://www.redshift.com/~juliebove/ – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->  Jeff Holt

Response:

"Julie Bove"  wrote … > I am not on a low carb diet.  I am following the diet given to me by

the dietician.  It works for me.  And I am on diet and exercise alone. I can’t explain why other people don’t eat this way except perhaps that it does not work for them. > —

I’m on a moderate carb diet — a bit less carbs than the plan the dietician gave me, but far from low carb. Perhaps 11-12 servings of carbs vs 15 on the original diet. And I’m on d&e too. It works for me. bj

Response:

> Hi , > My name is Jeff and I live in the North East of England but originally > from London. I was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in June of this year > and have been prescribed pills and diet to help me with the diabetes. > What I find interesting is that where I live the diet I have been > recommended by my diabetic nurse and my dietitian is high in > carbohydrates and low in fats, but from the majority of postings in > this newsgroup most people seem to be on a low carbohydrate diet, does > anybody have an explanation for this or is it just the latest thing. >  Jeff Holt

  The more carbs you eat, the more meds you must take, the more vigorous exercise you must endure and the harder it is to lose weight.  It’s your choice.   Many Type 2 diabetics choose to limit their carbs.  They repeatedly report that it makes it easier to lose weight (many, many diabetics are too heavy, losing weight helps them control blood sugars).  They report that low carb diets help them to minimize or eliminate medications.   The dieticians offer a high-carb "heart-smart" diet which tends to protect you from heart attacks if you can keep your blood sugars and weight down.  It’s not too bad for Type 1’s who control by shooting insulin.  However, for Type 2 diabetics, it is easy to prescribe, hard to live with.  Thus, the large number of low-carb believers in the diabetic ranks.   You must live with this disease the rest of your life.  You too will make these choices.  Welcome to the club. Most of us test two hours after a meal and aim for 7.8 mmol/L.  A 10 mmol/L after eating is thought acceptable but the 7.8 mmol/L is much more desirable.  If you can’t meet these goals, then best you reduce your carbs or ask your doc for stronger meds.  (The penalties for missing the goals are very unpleasant)  Good luck. Regards Old Al (T2 since. . .oops. . .T1 since 94, 35 units H + U via 4 injections daily)   A retired engineer who shares his experiences

Response:

The amount of carbs people here eat varies quite a lot. We do a complex dance with meds, nutrition and exercise. I’ve personally found my control best when I eat a combination of protein, fat and carb at every meal (4-5 small ones a day). There is also mounting evidence losing weight on fewer carbs causes less muscle loss and more fat loss, and results in more permanent loss. And as I lose more and more weight, I find it matters less and less what I eat. The carbs that used give me spikes after meals no longer do. I still avoid them, however. I’m in the process of cutting my meds now, and hope to have some years without them before the almost inevitable progression of this disease. I think exercise is the real key, however, both for weight loss and for control. Once I got into really good condition, I started being able to burn off blood sugar pretty quickly. >Hi , >My name is Jeff and I live in the North East of England but originally >from London. I was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in June of this year >and have been prescribed pills and diet to help me with the diabetes. >What I find interesting is that where I live the diet I have been >recommended by my diabetic nurse and my dietitian is high in >carbohydrates and low in fats, but from the majority of postings in >this newsgroup most people seem to be on a low carbohydrate diet, does >anybody have an explanation for this or is it just the latest thing. > Jeff Holt

Janet El, Type 2 dx 11/00 Glucophage 1000

Response:

| Thanks for your quick reply. As I have just started dieting I am | following  Doctors/Nurses orders but in the course of time if the | orders do not work I will experiment with my own diet,  as has been | quoted in this newsgroup often "ymmv" Testing before meals will not tell you if it is working, mean time you are doing damage to your body…. — Some mornings it just doesn’t seem worth it to gnaw through the leather straps. Emo Philips A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned how to walk forward. Franklin Delano Roosevelt www.erols.com/driver8 http://ntserver.at/rockcreek

Response:

| Thanks for your quick reply, I test before meals approx  3 times a day | and my BG counts are normally between 5 and 7 (I believe in the States | you multiply this by 18) . Before meals does not tell you how your foods affect your BGs… If you are at 140 before a meal what might you be at 1 hour after?  Maybe as high as 200, that is where damage is occurring. Test 2 hours after as well….   IMHO — Some mornings it just doesn’t seem worth it to gnaw through the leather straps. Emo Philips A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned how to walk forward. Franklin Delano Roosevelt www.erols.com/driver8 http://ntserver.at/rockcreek

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Jeff, I think that it is because many people in this group test after >meals with their glucometers, and have verified for themselves that >limiting carb intake helps them maintain normal bg levels.  The standard >"healthy diet" just does not work very well for many diabetics. >Personally I went from taking the maximum dose of tolinase to taking no >med by watching carbs, losing some weight, and exercising regularly.  If >I were still doing the recommended diet, I bet I would still be taking >meds. >Richard > Hi , > My name is Jeff and I live in the North East of England > snip

What I find interesting is that where I live the diet I have been > recommended by my diabetic nurse and my dietitian is high in > carbohydrates and low in fats, but from the majority of postings in > this newsgroup most people seem to be on a low carbohydrate diet, does > anybody have an explanation for this or is it just the latest thing. >  Jeff Holt

Hi Richard , Thanks for your quick reply. As I have just started dieting I am following  Doctors/Nurses orders but in the course of time if the orders do not work I will experiment with my own diet,  as has been quoted in this newsgroup often "ymmv"                     Regards Jeff PS: Should I top post or bottom post

Response:

> Jeff  replied: > Thanks for your quick reply, I test before meals approx  3 times a day > and my BG counts are normally between 5 and 7 (I believe in the States > you multiply this by 18) . >                                      Regards Jeff

Jeff… It’s the post meal numbers that really show how your body is handling this disease. Here’s the advice I give all newbies: Sounds like you’re planning a move to take control of your diabetes… good for you. There is so much to absorb… you don’t have to rush into anything.  Begin by using your best weapon in this war, your meter.   The most important thing you can do to learn about yourself and diabetes is test test  test. What you are looking to discover is how different foods affect you.  As I’m sure you’ve read, carbohydrates (sugars, wheat, rice… the things our Grandmas called "starches") raise blood sugars the most rapidly.  Protein and fat do raise them, but not as high and much more slowly… so if you’re a T2, generally the insulin your body still makes may take care of the rise. You might want to try some  experiments. First:  Day one:  eat whatever you’ve been currently eating… but write it down. Test yourself at the following times: Upon waking (fasting) 1 hour after each meal 2 hours after each meal At bedtime That means 8 x for that day.  What you will discover by this is how long after a meal your highest reading comes… and how fast you return to "normal".  Also, you may see that a meal that included bread, fruit or other carbs gives you a higher reading. Then for the next few days, try to curb your carbs.  Eliminate breads, cereals, rices, beans, any wheat products, potato, corn, fruit… get all your carbs from veggies.  Test at the same schedule above. If you try this for a few days, you may find some pretty damn good readings.  It’s worth a few days to discover. That’s the thing about this disease… we share much in common… we need to follow certain guidelines… but in the end, our bodies dictate our treatment and our success. The closer we get to non-diabetic numbers, the greater chance we have of avoiding horrible complications.  The key here is AIM… I know that everyone is at a different point in their disease… and it is progressive. But, if we aim for the best numbers and do our best, that’s all we can do. Here’s my opinion on what numbers to aim for, they are non-diabetic numbers. Fasting                       Under 6 One hour after meals         Under 8 Two hours after meals        Under 6.5 Recent studies have indicated that the most important numbers are your "after meal" numbers. They may be the most indicative of future complications, especially heart problems. Listen to your doctor, but you are the leader of your diabetic care team.  While his /her advice is learned, it is not absolute.   You will end up knowing much more about your body and how it’s handling diabetes than your doctor will.   The meter is our best weapon. Just remember, we’re not in a race or a competition with anyone but ourselves… Play around with your food plan… TEST TEST TEST.  Learn what foods cause spikes, what foods cause cravings… Use your body as a science experiment. Best of luck! Jennifer

Response:

>| Hi , >| My name is Jeff and I live in the North East of England >|snip >|

 What I find interesting is that where I live the diet I have been >| recommended by my diabetic nurse and my dietitian is high in >| carbohydrates and low in fats, but from the majority of postings in >| this newsgroup most people seem to be on a low carbohydrate diet, does >| anybody have an explanation for this or is it just the latest thing.

By testing our pre and post meal BGs it seems at least for me what keeps my BGs normal. That is what all this is about.  Do you test after meals? Jeff  replied: Thanks for your quick reply, I test before meals approx  3 times a day and my BG counts are normally between 5 and 7 (I believe in the States you multiply this by 18) .                                      Regards Jeff

Response:

| Hi , | My name is Jeff and I live in the North East of England but originally | from London. I was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in June of this year | and have been prescribed pills and diet to help me with the diabetes. | | What I find interesting is that where I live the diet I have been | recommended by my diabetic nurse and my dietitian is high in | carbohydrates and low in fats, but from the majority of postings in | this newsgroup most people seem to be on a low carbohydrate diet, does | anybody have an explanation for this or is it just the latest thing. By testing our pre and post meal BGs it seems at least for me what keeps my BGs normal…. That is what all this is about.  Do you test after meals? — Some mornings it just doesn’t seem worth it to gnaw through the leather straps. Emo Philips A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned how to walk forward. Franklin Delano Roosevelt www.erols.com/driver8 http://ntserver.at/rockcreek

Response:

Jeff, I think that it is because many people in this group test after meals with their glucometers, and have verified for themselves that limiting carb intake helps them maintain normal bg levels.  The standard "healthy diet" just does not work very well for many diabetics. Personally I went from taking the maximum dose of tolinase to taking no med by watching carbs, losing some weight, and exercising regularly.  If I were still doing the recommended diet, I bet I would still be taking meds. Richard – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hi , > My name is Jeff and I live in the North East of England but originally > from London. I was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in June of this year > and have been prescribed pills and diet to help me with the diabetes. > What I find interesting is that where I live the diet I have been > recommended by my diabetic nurse and my dietitian is high in > carbohydrates and low in fats, but from the majority of postings in > this newsgroup most people seem to be on a low carbohydrate diet, does > anybody have an explanation for this or is it just the latest thing. >  Jeff Holt

Response:

Hi , My name is Jeff and I live in the North East of England but originally from London. I was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in June of this year and have been prescribed pills and diet to help me with the diabetes. What I find interesting is that where I live the diet I have been recommended by my diabetic nurse and my dietitian is high in carbohydrates and low in fats, but from the majority of postings in this newsgroup most people seem to be on a low carbohydrate diet, does anybody have an explanation for this or is it just the latest thing.  Jeff Holt

Response:

> Can someone tell me of a good book or other source.on the proper diet for a > diabetic. PLEASE-NO MIRACLE DIETS, CURES,ETC. I am just looking for a > generally accepted set of recommendations.

Your best bet is to see a dietician.  There is no one diet that we all follow. — Type 2 http://www.redshift.com/~juliebove/

Response:

<snip> > "Many people who develop diabetes after age 40 can be cured by eating > a diet based on vegetables, whole grains, beans and fish and severely > restricting bakery products and sugar and limiting meat, chicken and > eggs and not eating fruits between meals.

<snip> That in itself should send up a BIG warning flag!  Diabetes can NOT be cured! — Type 2 http://www.redshift.com/~juliebove/

Response:

>> "Many people who develop diabetes after age 40 can be cured by eating > a diet based on vegetables, whole grains, beans and fish and severely > restricting bakery products and sugar and limiting meat, chicken and > eggs and not eating fruits between meals. >That in itself should send up a BIG warning flag!  Diabetes can NOT be >cured!

I generally agree with that, but having listened to Dr. Mirkin on the radio a fair amount and read his website quite a bit I am aware that when he says "cured" he is not saying "cured forever".  What he seems to mean rather is that people who follow his advice can (not "will") often achieve a state where they do not have to worry about their blood sugar and do not have to take medications.  Of course, if they go back on their old diets, gain weight, they will start having the same problems again. So if you follow his recommendations and go to another doctor that doctor may not be able to diagnose you as "diabetic" without already knowing your history.  Or at least that is his claim and he seems to back it up with good strong medical references.  And he is a mainstream allopathic physician, not an osteopath, chiropractor, or some new age quack.  That doesn’t mean he is right about everything. I find his diet something I cannot follow completely, for example.  My teeth are not good enough to deal with a cup of wheat berries at every meal, and I like fat too much.  On the other hand I find that I can indeed eat a good amount of cooked whole grains without spiking my blood glucose. But I agree that "cure" is too strong a word for what he is claiming. And I think you are perfectly right to take it as a warning, too.   On the other hand he is at least not saying that everyone can be "cured" by following his recommendations, only that "many" people can be. Still I think he is worth a listen in spite of the too strong claim in that excerpt. Ed Seedhouse

Response:

>"Many people who develop diabetes after age 40 can be cured by eating >a diet based on vegetables, whole grains, beans and fish and severely >restricting bakery products and sugar and limiting meat, chicken and >eggs and not eating fruits between meals. >Ed Seedhouse

no, this is a false a statement.  This type of eating or not eating as the case may be, is about "controlling" the diabetes, it is in NO way a cure. To date their is NO cure for diabetes, regardless of type. Derek Type 1 since 1975 Minimed 508 Insulin Pump http://www.diabeticnet.com http://sweetblood.org http://www.insulin-pumpers.org http://www.diabetesinterview.com http://www.zerolimit.net (irc server webpage for our chat room) #diabeticnet is the name of our IRC chat on zerolimit.net http://www.zerolimit.net/files/zl-mirc.exe  http://www.irchelp.org/irchelp/misc/webtv.html http://www.xs4all.nl/~ircle/  <–Ircle Mac IRC software http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2001/06/cureall.htm

Response:

says… >Can someone tell me of a good book or other source.on the proper diet for a >diabetic. PLEASE-NO MIRACLE DIETS, CURES,ETC. I am just looking for a >generally accepted set of recommendations.

My favorite book isn’t specifically for diabetics. It’s "Eat, Drink and Be Healthy". It’s published by Harvard and written by the head of their medical school. They rework the USDA food pyramid using more current research, and explain how to interpret research. I’ve found almost everything in it agrees with what I’ve learned here. Janet El, Type 2 dx 11/00 Glucophage 1250, diet, exercise

Response:

> Myths?  Well,  it is said that eating a lower carb diet causes everything > from kidney failure to hair loss… However, after exhaustive research on > the net, I have found no studies that prove any of that.  In anecdotal > reports, many many diabetics find it is the only way they have been able to > maintain good glucose and lipid levels.

I guess I’m one of those many.  Only, many of the best sources of vitamins and minerals and such happen to come with carbohydrates.  So even though I try to get as much of them as my BG will allow, I wonder about deficiencies.  The first few months since diagnosis, I felt MUCH better than I had in previous years. But now my overall "feeling" is starting to "go downhill" and I wonder whether that’s why. — Wes Groleau http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau

Response:

As Julie says we all follow our own way of eating  I bought a book by Dr.Allan Borshuk called the Calorie Fat and/ Carbohydrate diet on Amazon. com. This books contains listings for 11,000 foods and their carbs  I carried it like a bible. Loretta

In tribute to the United States of America and the Stateof Israel, two bastions of strength in a world filled with strife andterrorism.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> "Many people who develop diabetes after age 40 can be cured by eating >> a diet based on vegetables, whole grains, beans and fish and severely >> restricting bakery products and sugar and limiting meat, chicken and >> eggs and not eating fruits between meals. >That in itself should send up a BIG warning flag!  Diabetes can NOT be >cured! > I generally agree with that, but having listened to Dr. Mirkin on the > radio a fair amount and read his website quite a bit I am aware that > when he says "cured" he is not saying "cured forever".  What he seems > to mean rather is that people who follow his advice can (not "will") > often achieve a state where they do not have to worry about their > blood sugar and do not have to take medications.  Of course, if they > go back on their old diets, gain weight, they will start having the > same problems again.

We always have to worry about our BG. > So if you follow his recommendations and go to another doctor that > doctor may not be able to diagnose you as "diabetic" without already > knowing your history.  Or at least that is his claim and he seems to > back it up with good strong medical references.  And he is a > mainstream allopathic physician, not an osteopath, chiropractor, or > some new age quack.  That doesn’t mean he is right about everything. > I find his diet something I cannot follow completely, for example.  My > teeth are not good enough to deal with a cup of wheat berries at every > meal, and I like fat too much.  On the other hand I find that I can > indeed eat a good amount of cooked whole grains without spiking my > blood glucose.

I don’t follow his plan.  I follow the Exchange Plan.  And at times I have been controlled quite well by diet and exercise.  This (I believe) caused me to be told by two different Drs. that I was NOT diabetic.  And now I have Neuropathy.  This kind of thinking is very dangerous.  Once a diabetic, always a diabetic.  At least for the time being. > But I agree that "cure" is too strong a word for what he is claiming. > And I think you are perfectly right to take it as a warning, too.   On > the other hand he is at least not saying that everyone can be "cured" > by following his recommendations, only that "many" people can be. > Still I think he is worth a listen in spite of the too strong claim in > that excerpt.

I disagree.  If he is going to word things as such, then he is misleading people.  That is enough for me to not want to hear anything else he has to say. — Type 2 http://www.redshift.com/~juliebove/

Response:

> I generally agree with that, but having listened to Dr. Mirkin on the > radio a fair amount and read his website quite a bit I am aware that > when he says "cured" he is not saying "cured forever".  What he seems > to mean rather is that people who follow his advice can (not "will") > often achieve a state where they do not have to worry about their > blood sugar and do not have to take medications.  Of course, if they > go back on their old diets, gain weight, they will start having the > same problems again. > So if you follow his recommendations and go to another doctor that > doctor may not be able to diagnose you as "diabetic" without already > knowing your history.

I am using Glucophage and a low carb food plan. My last blood tests were an A1c of 4.8 and a fasting BG of 96.  Lipids of 182 total. So if I went to another doctor that doctor would not be able to diagnose me as diabetic… ON PAPER. Two Krispy Kremes would prove otherwise. It does not mean I am cured, it means I am in control. Jennifer

Response:

> But I agree that "cure" is too strong a word for what he is claiming. > And I think you are perfectly right to take it as a warning, too.   On > the other hand he is at least not saying that everyone can be "cured" > by following his recommendations, only that "many" people can be. > Still I think he is worth a listen in spite of the too strong claim in > that excerpt.

I definitely think that "cured" is misleading, and am much more in favor of how it tends to be discussed here as simply being a "diabetic in control."  I expect there are a number of people here who would not appear abnormal during a doctor’s visit and/or blood test, but who would still shoot up sky high with a heavy dose of carbohydrate.  That they are well-controlled – even if only diet and exercise – is a far cry from cured.  And calling it cured is more hyperbole than I’d be comfortable with and it would probably bias my viewpoint towards anyone using it. — David

Response:

I’d have to agree with Janet.. I’m currently following a half-ass version of this diet.. and seem to be doing quite well on it. but each person has to find their own way of eating. what works for one will/or might not work for the next. — RK [T1 that was smarter then her previous Doctors!][dx'd 5/00][Lantus Lover w/Novolog] http://www.zerolimit.net/files/zl-mirc.exe (#diabeticnet chatroom software)

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – "KSB" > says… >Can someone tell me of a good book or other source.on the proper diet for a >diabetic. PLEASE-NO MIRACLE DIETS, CURES,ETC. I am just looking for a >generally accepted set of recommendations. > My favorite book isn’t specifically for diabetics. It’s "Eat, Drink and Be > Healthy". It’s published by Harvard and written by the head of their medical > school. They rework the USDA food pyramid using more current research, and > explain how to interpret research. I’ve found almost everything in it agrees > with what I’ve learned here. > Janet El, Type 2 dx 11/00 Glucophage 1250, diet, exercise

Response:

>I’m currently following a half-ass version of this diet…

You’ll only be half as cheeky !

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’d have to agree with Janet.. > I’m currently following a half-ass version of this diet.. and seem to be > doing quite well on it. > but each person has to find their own way of eating. what works for one > will/or might not > work for the next. > — > RK > [T1 that was smarter then her previous Doctors!][dx'd 5/00][Lantus Lover > w/Novolog] > http://www.zerolimit.net/files/zl-mirc.exe (#diabeticnet chatroom software) > In article

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> "KSB" > says… > >Can someone tell me of a good book or other source.on the proper diet for > a > >diabetic. PLEASE-NO MIRACLE DIETS, CURES,ETC. I am just looking for a > >generally accepted set of recommendations. > My favorite book isn’t specifically for diabetics. It’s "Eat, Drink and Be > Healthy". It’s published by Harvard and written by the head of their > medical > school. They rework the USDA food pyramid using more current research, and > explain how to interpret research. I’ve found almost everything in it > agrees > with what I’ve learned here. > Janet El, Type 2 dx 11/00 Glucophage 1250, diet, exercise

Response:

> As a source of information on diet and diabetes I like

www.drmirkin.com ….  Anyway, here is a quote on diet for diabetics from this web site: > "Many people who develop diabetes after age 40 can be cured by …

He loses me right there. How can I trust what he says, after an opening like that? bj

Response:

Can someone tell me of a good book or other source.on the proper diet for a diabetic. PLEASE-NO MIRACLE DIETS, CURES,ETC. I am just looking for a generally accepted set of recommendations.

Response:

>Can someone tell me of a good book or other source.on the proper diet for a >diabetic. PLEASE-NO MIRACLE DIETS, CURES,ETC. I am just looking for a >generally accepted set of recommendations.

Many people advocate a low carbohydrate diet, and while this certainly reduces your sugar levels there is controversy about the effects on health of such a diet.   As a source of information on diet and diabetes I like www.drmirkin.com because he cites papers published in peer reviewed journals to back up his advice.  Naturally *no* single source of information should be taken as gospel.  Anyway, here is a quote on diet for diabetics from this web site: "Many people who develop diabetes after age 40 can be cured by eating a diet based on vegetables, whole grains, beans and fish and severely restricting bakery products and sugar and limiting meat, chicken and eggs and not eating fruits between meals. Most late-onset diabetics have insulin; they lack the ability to respond adequately to insulin because they are overweight or they eat too much fat and refined carbohydrates. The first order is to substitute whole grains for bakery products because they fill you up and help you to eat less, and to restrict major sources of fat. A major study from Europe shows that eating too much protein damages the kidneys in diabetics (1). So diabetics should restrict meat, chicken and eggs. Another recent study shows that diets rich in refined carbohydrates harm diabetics and that taking monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats in vegetables and omega-3 fatty acids in fish helps to reduce insulin requirements (2). So substitute whole grains for foods made from flour. High blood sugar levels after meals cause sugar to stick to cells and be converted to a poison called sorbitol that causes nerve, kidney, artery and heart damage. To keep blood sugar levels from rising too high, substitute whole grains for refined carbohydrates found in bakery products, avoid table sugar and eat fruits only with meals. 1) M Toeller, A Buyken, G Heitkamp, S Bramswig, J Mann, R Milne, FA Gries, H Keen, B Karamanos, C Tountas and 4 more authors. Protein intake and urinary albumin excretion rates in the EURODIAB IDDM complications study. Diabetologia 40: 10 (OCT 1997): 219-1226. address M Toeller, Univ Dusseldorf, Diabet Res Inst, Clin Dept, Hennekamp 65, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. 2) EM Berry. Dietary fatty acids in the management of diabetes mellitus. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 66: Suppl. 4(OCT 1997):S991-S997. Address EM Berry, Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Hadassah Med Sch, Dept Human Nutr & Metab, POB 12272, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel." Ed Seedhouse

Response:

> Can someone tell me of a good book or other source.on the proper diet for a > diabetic. PLEASE-NO MIRACLE DIETS, CURES,ETC. I am just looking for a > generally accepted set of recommendations.

You ask what on the surface appears to be a simple question… but it isn’t. There are many different food plans that diabetics use to control their glucose.  And believe me, they are different. The most important thing we all need to remember is that there is no ONE diabetic diet. Low carb will work for some. Low fat will work for others. The ADA diet will work for some. The food pyramid will work for others. The only thing that is absolutely true is that whatever diet you and your meter determine works for you, will ONLY work if you stay on it. If you choose a plan to test…and then follow it half way, half heartedly for a week or so, you won’t have a good idea if that plan works. As for the different plans… only you and your meter can decide which is best for you.  But, there are some general facts and myths. The "higher carb – low fat" plan of the ADA generally works best when the carbs consumed are of the "complex" variety.  Stay away from highly processed carbohydrates.  Aim for whole grains, brown rices, very little processed sugar.  Try toi get much of your carbs from veggies. The "lower carb – higher protein" plan generally works best when you don’t fiddle with it.  If you begin to add in too many carbs (your meter will know) you will find the cravings return, and it will be that much harder to stay the course… and your BG will rise. Myths?  Well,  it is said that eating a lower carb diet causes everything from kidney failure to hair loss… However, after exhaustive research on the net, I have found no studies that prove any of that.  In anecdotal reports, many many diabetics find it is the only way they have been able to maintain good glucose and lipid levels. The higher carb diet has been maligned for causing more and more diabetics to succumb to all those horrible complications… blindness, amputations etc.  However, it is the diet of choice of many many august organizations including the ADA. And many people find they do great on it. The only thing we can truly be sure of, is that keeping our blood glucose at non-diabetic levels, is the best way to avoid nasty complications.  So do whatever it takes to get there. Non-diabetic numbers are: Fasting:    60 – 100 1hr pp:     under 140 2 hr pp:    under 120 Before a meal:   60 – 120 With an A1c under 6 So… if your diet is doing that.  STAY ON IT.  If it isn’t… then you might want to experiment with other options. Try your diet out for two weeks: Eat according to your chosen plan – But, test yourself at the following times: Upon waking (fasting) 1 hour after each meal 2 hours after each meal At bedtime That means 8 x each day.  What you will discover by this is how long after a meal your highest reading comes… and how fast you return to "normal".  You will learn how the food you’re eating affects your BG. Look at this as a big ole science experiment… If you are not achieving the numbers you desire… you might want to try another plan… But it will be up to you to know if you are being honest with the plan.  A little change here and there, while it doesn’t make you a bad person… will skew the experiment and make the results suspect. As long as it’s working for you… You’re doing fine. Together we’ll help each other succeed. Jennifer

Response:

Tony…. what’s aubergine?  what family…. legume, tuber, night shade,…. — k t1 13 yrs – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > A great addition to this dish is aubergine; dice and in she goes. As for the > tomatoes I prefer whole canned which I mash lightly using a potato masher. > Regards > Tony

Response:

A great addition to this dish is aubergine; dice and in she goes. As for the tomatoes I prefer whole canned which I mash lightly using a potato masher. Regards Tony

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> In fact, that’s a wonderful side-dish right there — stewed tomatoes >> or stewed zuke in tomato sauce.  I’d just add a bit of garlic and some >> basil. > Ok Jude, that sounds like something I’d like to try…I’ve got garlic > bulbs, roma tomatos and I’ll pick up some fresh basil leaves and and a > zuchinni…should I get a can of tomato sauce?…can you explain to a > newbie how you go about "stewing" tomatos and zuke ? Do I just empty the > can of tom sauce in a pot/pan, heat it, slice the zuke and tom and put > them in there and let simmer until the zuke is is tender ?  the tomato > starts out soft, so what do i look for there ? > Look for the zuke to be tender, but still a bit al dente.  Remember as it > cools, the zuke will continue to cook.  Roma’s are great flavored > tomatoes.  Don’t worry about the tomatoes, make sure that you don’t cook > the zuke too long.  And if you are making a larger batch for microwaving, > remember that that will also cook the ingredients longer, so undercook > all the batches you will have later.  Depending on what you are doing with > it, the simmer may be as short as three to five minutes. > I don’t add tomato sauce.  I like it kind of soupy.  I just use the > tomatoes.  Did I mention onions?  They are pretty good in there, too. > Zuchinni will be a major component of our garden this spring.  We’ll > grow it together.  Mine will be strictly in containers as my property > is likely terribly polluted with carcinogens.  So anyone with a few > square feet of space will be able to do what I do, even those that live > in an apartment (flat).  We’ll start about March. > There is nothing like home-grown foods.  Commercial foods are grown from > species and seeds that will allow them to be shipped and stored.  That > mens that the veggies must be picked earlier than prime, and they must > be transported and/or stored.  Usually the species used have thicker > peels and a harder flesh.  And less flavor.  Fresh veggies can be eaten, > cooked or canned right away and they have a much better flavor. > Those that want a head-start, keep your eye open to the produce department > of your grocery.  Chive is one of the most flavorful herbs, and you want > to look for very healthy stems, thick, about 1/4 inch.  It’s not too > early to get a live chive clump.  Water it every day — it likes a lot > of water.  Put it on your windowsill where it will get good sun, and trim > it very often, leaving about an inch and 1/2 to 2 inches.  Trim it even > if you throw the trimmed part out.  It grows better because it is trimmed. > A chive clump will last for years. > When spring comes, it will transplant easily to your garden.  Then it will > continue to proliferate even after harsh winters. > Hugs everyone. > Jude > — >         Crouch Enterprises – Telecom, Internet & Unix Consulting >       Oak Park, IL  708-848-0134  URL: http://www.pobox.com/~jcrouch

Response:

Instead of chopping basil with a knife use a scissors and cut, that way you don’t bruise the basil. Tony <snip> – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> the basil is in the form of whole green leaves – I guess I need to > chop/cut it up ? > Yes, I would chop it a bit, but it could be added as whole leaves. > Basil is another of those herbs that we can grow on our windowsill > all year long.  The key again is to trim the plant often, even if you > don’t use the trimmings.  Basil grows fairly tall, so you want to > "tame" the plant to be shorter.  By trimming you prevent the plant > from going to seed.  Once it goes to seed, it gets bitter. > Basil+garlic=pesto.  It’s a wonderful flavor to add to many foods. > Best eating. > Jude > — >         Crouch Enterprises – Telecom, Internet & Unix Consulting >       Oak Park, IL  708-848-0134  URL: http://www.pobox.com/~jcrouch

Response:

I think aubergine is also known as eggplant. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Tony…. what’s aubergine?  what family…. legume, tuber, night shade,…. > — > k t1 13 yrs > A great addition to this dish is aubergine; dice and in she goes. As for > the > tomatoes I prefer whole canned which I mash lightly using a potato masher. > Regards > Tony

Response:

thanks Jan…. you can substitute the zuke with eggplant (unless you have instead of parmesan try ricotta — k t1 13 yrs – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I think aubergine is also known as eggplant. > Tony…. what’s aubergine?  what family…. legume, tuber, night shade,…. > > A great addition to this dish is aubergine; dice and in she goes. As for > the > > tomatoes I prefer whole canned which I mash lightly using a potato masher. > > Regards > > Tony

Response:

I am new to this group.  My husband has been a Type 1 for 15+ years.  I am curious what percentage of Carbs. Pro. & Fat others are using in their diets.  For years it was high carbs, very low fat is best, but now I am reading that lowering carbs and increasing fat may be the way to go.  He uses exchanges instead of carb counting. Thank you, Linda

Response:

Linda, It’s quite possible to combine low-fat and low-carb and use exchanges. That’s what I do.  Standard low-carb didn’t work well for me at all.  I stay with exchanges because it’s easier and makes for a balanced nutritional plan.  I just choose the lower carb items on my exchange list. — Teri T2, nutrition & exercise, 4/99 This isn’t a diet.  It’s a permanent lifestyle change. I WILL do this!

| I am new to this group.  My husband has been a Type 1 for 15+ years.  I am | curious what percentage of Carbs. Pro. & Fat others are using in their | diets.  For years it was high carbs, very low fat is best, but now I am | reading that lowering carbs and increasing fat may be the way to go.  He | uses exchanges instead of carb counting. | | Thank you, | Linda | |

Response:

Linda, I just finished the second (and last) day of Diabetes Education class.  The dietician gave me a meal plan that has me consuming 45 grams of carbs at each meal with two snacks of 15 grams of carbs each.  It is important to remember to eat proteins with the carbs at every meal to slow the rise in blood glucose. Your husband’s blood glucose levels are the best indication of whether his meal plan is working or not.  If he is in good control and his blood tests are not showing anything bad then his diet is probably just fine.  Everyone is different.  What works for one person may not work for another. ~Cheryl – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Linda wrote… > I am new to this group.  My husband has been a Type 1 for 15+ years.  I am > curious what percentage of Carbs. Pro. & Fat others are using in their > diets.  For years it was high carbs, very low fat is best, but now I am > reading that lowering carbs and increasing fat may be the way to go.  He > uses exchanges instead of carb counting. > Thank you, > Linda

Response:

Re. eating protein with every carb.  I have always read that diabetics need a low protein diet to help avoid kidney problems.  I have my husband at: 57% carb., 17% pro. & 24% fat.   I was just curious to the breakdown others were using in their diets.  His last A1C was very good. Thank you, Linda

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Linda, > I just finished the second (and last) day of Diabetes Education class. The > dietician gave me a meal plan that has me consuming 45 grams of carbs at > each meal with two snacks of 15 grams of carbs each.  It is important to > remember to eat proteins with the carbs at every meal to slow the rise in > blood glucose. > Your husband’s blood glucose levels are the best indication of whether his > meal plan is working or not.  If he is in good control and his blood tests > are not showing anything bad then his diet is probably just fine. Everyone > is different.  What works for one person may not work for another. > ~Cheryl > Linda wrote… > I am new to this group.  My husband has been a Type 1 for 15+ years.  I am > curious what percentage of Carbs. Pro. & Fat others are using in their > diets.  For years it was high carbs, very low fat is best, but now I am > reading that lowering carbs and increasing fat may be the way to go.  He > uses exchanges instead of carb counting. > Thank you, > Linda

Response:

There is no doubt that high protein diets are potentially bad for people with compromised kidneys. But, despite a serious search for information and research, I can find no information leading to the hypothesis that a high protein diet is bad for people with normal or even slightly compromised kidney function. It is my belief that this low protein advice is an old-wives tale, left over from the pre-home-glucometer days of poor glycemic control. It is the glycation of the nephrons, and the presence of Advanced Glycation Endproducts (AGE) which contribute to the nephrotoxicity leading to proteinuria. Absent that glycation, as in a well controlled diabetic, the kidneys actually can heal. That happened to me. At dx, my UA revealed that I had not micro but macro albuminaria, a +2 on the old dipstick. While searching for a solution for my flavor of diabetes, and having had the ADA high carb diet fail for me, I wanted to try the ever popular, but officially scorned, low carb WOE. But I was concerned with the high protein consumption and concommitant kidney stress that that WOE implied. I found that some considerable research, multi-year, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled research, called the DFAN study had been carried out in Germany. That is where I got the information about the AGEs, and glycation. So I gave it a try. End result: +2, +1, Trace, None, None, None,and a follow up microalbuminaria test was low normal. The important point here is not what diet works for you, HC or LC, but that glycemic control is paramount. Secondly, taking antioxidants has been proven in this study to assist our kidneys in healing. Fairly large doses of beta-carotene, vit C, E, folic acid, alpha and gamma linoleic acid, and alpha lipoic acid actually were proven to scavenge the free radical oxidants which cause, or at least are linked to, AGE and, hence, nephropathy. If your current WOE is working for you, then it only makes sense to stay with it. But it appears that the old saw about limiting proteins may be erroneous. Now I’m not a vitamin and supplements huckster, if you buy them or where you buy them is your own choice, but based upon this credible medical research, and my personal experience, I thought you might want to know. Best, Jim (last A1c – 5.4) – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Re. eating protein with every carb.  I have always read that diabetics need > a low protein diet to help avoid kidney problems.  I have my husband at: > 57% carb., 17% pro. & 24% fat.   I was just curious to the breakdown others > were using in their diets.  His last A1C was very good. > Thank you, > Linda

Response:

I greatly appreciate this information.  What does WOE stand for??? My husbands numbers are good but  he is having some problem with weight gain.  I thought decreasing the carbs might help with this.  He is also Thanks again. Linda

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> There is no doubt that high protein diets are potentially bad for people > with compromised kidneys. But, despite a serious search for information > and research, I can find no information leading to the hypothesis that a > high protein diet is bad for people with normal or even slightly > compromised kidney function. It is my belief that this low protein > advice is an old-wives tale, left over from the pre-home-glucometer days > of poor glycemic control. > It is the glycation of the nephrons, and the presence of Advanced > Glycation Endproducts (AGE) which contribute to the nephrotoxicity > leading to proteinuria. Absent that glycation, as in a well controlled > diabetic, the kidneys actually can heal. That happened to me. > At dx, my UA revealed that I had not micro but macro albuminaria, a +2 > on the old dipstick. While searching for a solution for my flavor of > diabetes, and having had the ADA high carb diet fail for me, I wanted to > try the ever popular, but officially scorned, low carb WOE. But I was > concerned with the high protein consumption and concommitant kidney > stress that that WOE implied. > I found that some considerable research, multi-year, multi-center, > double-blind, placebo-controlled research, called the DFAN study had > been carried out in Germany. That is where I got the information about > the AGEs, and glycation. So I gave it a try. > End result: +2, +1, Trace, None, None, None,and a follow up > microalbuminaria test was low normal. > The important point here is not what diet works for you, HC or LC, but > that glycemic control is paramount. Secondly, taking antioxidants has > been proven in this study to assist our kidneys in healing. Fairly large > doses of beta-carotene, vit C, E, folic acid, alpha and gamma linoleic > acid, and alpha lipoic acid actually were proven to scavenge the free > radical oxidants which cause, or at least are linked to, AGE and, hence, > nephropathy. > If your current WOE is working for you, then it only makes sense to stay > with it. But it appears that the old saw about limiting proteins may be > erroneous. Now I’m not a vitamin and supplements huckster, if you buy > them or where you buy them is your own choice, but based upon this > credible medical research, and my personal experience, I thought you > might want to know. > Best, > Jim > (last A1c – 5.4) > Re. eating protein with every carb.  I have always read that diabetics need > a low protein diet to help avoid kidney problems.  I have my husband at: > 57% carb., 17% pro. & 24% fat.   I was just curious to the breakdown others > were using in their diets.  His last A1C was very good. > Thank you, > Linda

Response:

WOE= way of eating Jan

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I greatly appreciate this information.  What does WOE stand for??? > My husbands numbers are good but  he is having some problem with weight > gain.  I thought decreasing the carbs might help with this.  He is also > Thanks again. > Linda > There is no doubt that high protein diets are

potentially bad for people > with compromised kidneys. But, despite a serious search for information > and research, I can find no information leading to the hypothesis that a > high protein diet is bad for people with normal or even slightly > compromised kidney function. It is my belief that this low protein > advice is an old-wives tale, left over from the

pre-home-glucometer days – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> of poor glycemic control. > It is the glycation of the nephrons, and the presence of Advanced > Glycation Endproducts (AGE) which contribute to the nephrotoxicity > leading to proteinuria. Absent that glycation, as in a well controlled > diabetic, the kidneys actually can heal. That happened to me. > At dx, my UA revealed that I had not micro but macro albuminaria, a +2 > on the old dipstick. While searching for a solution for my flavor of > diabetes, and having had the ADA high carb diet fail for me, I wanted to > try the ever popular, but officially scorned, low carb WOE. But I was > concerned with the high protein consumption and concommitant kidney > stress that that WOE implied. > I found that some considerable research, multi-year, multi-center, > double-blind, placebo-controlled research, called the DFAN study had > been carried out in Germany. That is where I got the information about > the AGEs, and glycation. So I gave it a try. > End result: +2, +1, Trace, None, None, None,and a follow  up > microalbuminaria test was low normal. > The important point here is not what diet works for you, HC or LC, but > that glycemic control is paramount. Secondly, taking antioxidants has > been proven in this study to assist our kidneys in

healing. Fairly large > doses of beta-carotene, vit C, E, folic acid, alpha and gamma linoleic > acid, and alpha lipoic acid actually were proven to scavenge the free > radical oxidants which cause, or at least are linked to, AGE and, hence, > nephropathy. > If your current WOE is working for you, then it only makes sense to stay > with it. But it appears that the old saw about limiting proteins may be > erroneous. Now I’m not a vitamin and supplements

huckster, if you buy – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> them or where you buy them is your own choice, but based upon this > credible medical research, and my personal experience, I thought you > might want to know. > Best, > Jim > (last A1c – 5.4) > > Re. eating protein with every carb.  I have always read that diabetics > need > > a low protein diet to help avoid kidney problems.  I have my husband at: > > 57% carb., 17% pro. & 24% fat.   I was just curious to the breakdown > others > > were using in their diets.  His last A1C was very good. > > Thank you, > > Linda

Response:

> I greatly appreciate this information.  What does WOE stand for??? > My husbands numbers are good but  he is having some problem with weight > gain.  I thought decreasing the carbs might help with this.  He is also

Linda, Change the carbs.  More brocolli, cauliflower, brussel sprouts, asparagus, green beans, cabbage.  Less corn, peas, potatoes, grains. On the "fairly safe" list is tomatoes, onions, bell peppers, zuchinni. In fact, that’s a wonderful side-dish right there — stewed tomatoes or stewed zuke in tomato sauce.  I’d just add a bit of garlic and some basil. Add poultry instead of beef to cut fats (fat is much more caloric), serve fish several times a week because it is generally low-calorie and has omega-3 fats (read: good for you).  Save the beef for a special occasion. Breads and pastas are the most difficult part.  We use bread for sandwiches and there are not a lot of good alternatives.  Sandwiches are convenient. Salads are eaten differently, but they can take the place of the bread. Within reason, almost anything that can be put on a piece of bread can be put on a salad.  (I wouldn’t use peanut butter or jelly). Don’t forget soups, too.  Most veggies cook well and a bit of chicken stock and a few raw veggies makes a soup pretty quickly.  Pay attention: it’s mostly water.  I’ll throw a few Tbls of rice or some cooked pasta from my freezer to make it more interesting.  Soup slows you down and then your natural process of satisfaction begins.  You’ll eat less during the meal. Which brings us to the matter of timing.  Most of us eat too much because we eat so fast.  It takes time for our brain to get the signal from our stomach that we have been fed.  This is difficult for Modern Man, since we always have *something else* to do besides eating.  We always seem to want to "get that out of the way".  How many here had a romantic candle-lit dinner with the TV off, classical music on the stereo, and lots of food (all good for you)?  No rush.  By the time you get to this point, it hardly matters what you serve. Before I close, I must talk about exercise.  BLAH.  Exercise is the second-best thing that a diabetic can do for themselves.  It doesn’t have to be particularly strenuous, but it is absolutely necessary.  Those who have limb mobility can start by just a walk around the block once or twice a day.  Increase the length and the pace as you go along. walk with your spouse or lover, walk with the kids, walk with the dog. The goal is 20 minutes of quick-pace walking to achieve the most benefit. But don’t let that throw you off.  Five minutes of walking is better than zero minutes of exercise. Talk to us!  Let us know if any of these suggestions help.  Let us know how we can help you. Jude —         Crouch Enterprises – Telecom, Internet & Unix Consulting       Oak Park, IL  708-848-0134  URL: http://www.pobox.com/~jcrouch

Response:

> In fact, that’s a wonderful side-dish right there — stewed tomatoes > or stewed zuke in tomato sauce.  I’d just add a bit of garlic and some > basil.

Ok Jude, that sounds like something I’d like to try…I’ve got garlic bulbs, roma tomatos and I’ll pick up some fresh basil leaves and and a zuchinni…should I get a can of tomato sauce?…can you explain to a newbie how you go about "stewing" tomatos and zuke ? Do I just empty the can of tom sauce in a pot/pan, heat it, slice the zuke and tom and put them in there and let simmer until the zuke is is tender ?  the tomato starts out soft, so what do i look for there ? -Adrian Raleigh, NC

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > In fact, that’s a wonderful side-dish right there — stewed tomatoes > > or stewed zuke in tomato sauce.  I’d just add a bit of garlic and some > > basil. > Ok Jude, that sounds like something I’d like to try…I’ve got garlic > bulbs, roma tomatos and I’ll pick up some fresh basil leaves and and a > zuchinni…should I get a can of tomato sauce?…can you explain to a > newbie how you go about "stewing" tomatos and zuke ? Do I just empty the > can of tom sauce in a pot/pan, heat it, slice the zuke and tom and put > them in there and let simmer until the zuke is is tender ?  the tomato > starts out soft, so what do i look for there ? > -Adrian > Raleigh, NC > Adrian….. from the culinary challenged department…. i chop up the > onions, smash the garlic, put them in a deep sided fry pan, cook at high > stirring constantly until the onions are translucent….throw in the > tomatoes and "chop" them with the spatula…. toss in the basil….stir…. > wait 5 to 10 min (to let the flavours mix)…. toss the zuke on top of the > mix, turn down to a simmer, cover and let the mixture steam the zuke until > translucent…… just after serving, sprinkle parmesan cheese on top > (really), but chop it into 1 inch strips and put it in when you put in the > i know this isn’t a recipe, but it’s how i cook (never the same dish twice!) > — > k t1 13 yrs

Thanks J & TL! The grocer was out of zuke, so I bought yellow squash.  Cook the same way ? "smash the garlic", I’ll have to try that.  So far I’ve always sliced it.  Somebody (probably Jude) said to use the side of the knife blade. I’ve always started by heating up some olive oil and adding the onions & garlic, but it sounds like we’re not using oil here, just putting the onions and garlic straight in a hot empty pan ? won’t they burn ? should I add water ? the basil is in the form of whole green leaves – I guess I need to chop/cut it up ? -Adrian t2, raleigh, nc

Response:

>> In fact, that’s a wonderful side-dish right there — stewed tomatoes > or stewed zuke in tomato sauce.  I’d just add a bit of garlic and some > basil. > Ok Jude, that sounds like something I’d like to try…I’ve got garlic > bulbs, roma tomatos and I’ll pick up some fresh basil leaves and and a > zuchinni…should I get a can of tomato sauce?…can you explain to a > newbie how you go about "stewing" tomatos and zuke ? Do I just empty the > can of tom sauce in a pot/pan, heat it, slice the zuke and tom and put > them in there and let simmer until the zuke is is tender ?  the tomato > starts out soft, so what do i look for there ?

Look for the zuke to be tender, but still a bit al dente.  Remember as it cools, the zuke will continue to cook.  Roma’s are great flavored tomatoes.  Don’t worry about the tomatoes, make sure that you don’t cook the zuke too long.  And if you are making a larger batch for microwaving, remember that that will also cook the ingredients longer, so undercook all the batches you will have later.  Depending on what you are doing with it, the simmer may be as short as three to five minutes. I don’t add tomato sauce.  I like it kind of soupy.  I just use the tomatoes.  Did I mention onions?  They are pretty good in there, too. Zuchinni will be a major component of our garden this spring.  We’ll grow it together.  Mine will be strictly in containers as my property is likely terribly polluted with carcinogens.  So anyone with a few square feet of space will be able to do what I do, even those that live in an apartment (flat).  We’ll start about March. There is nothing like home-grown foods.  Commercial foods are grown from species and seeds that will allow them to be shipped and stored.  That mens that the veggies must be picked earlier than prime, and they must be transported and/or stored.  Usually the species used have thicker peels and a harder flesh.  And less flavor.  Fresh veggies can be eaten, cooked or canned right away and they have a much better flavor. Those that want a head-start, keep your eye open to the produce department of your grocery.  Chive is one of the most flavorful herbs, and you want to look for very healthy stems, thick, about 1/4 inch.  It’s not too early to get a live chive clump.  Water it every day — it likes a lot of water.  Put it on your windowsill where it will get good sun, and trim it very often, leaving about an inch and 1/2 to 2 inches.  Trim it even if you throw the trimmed part out.  It grows better because it is trimmed.   A chive clump will last for years. When spring comes, it will transplant easily to your garden.  Then it will continue to proliferate even after harsh winters. Hugs everyone. Jude —         Crouch Enterprises – Telecom, Internet & Unix Consulting       Oak Park, IL  708-848-0134  URL: http://www.pobox.com/~jcrouch

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In fact, that’s a wonderful side-dish right there — stewed tomatoes > or stewed zuke in tomato sauce.  I’d just add a bit of garlic and some > basil. > Ok Jude, that sounds like something I’d like to try…I’ve got garlic > bulbs, roma tomatos and I’ll pick up some fresh basil leaves and and a > zuchinni…should I get a can of tomato sauce?…can you explain to a > newbie how you go about "stewing" tomatos and zuke ? Do I just empty the > can of tom sauce in a pot/pan, heat it, slice the zuke and tom and put > them in there and let simmer until the zuke is is tender ?  the tomato > starts out soft, so what do i look for there ? > -Adrian > Raleigh, NC

Adrian….. from the culinary challenged department…. i chop up the onions, smash the garlic, put them in a deep sided fry pan, cook at high stirring constantly until the onions are translucent….throw in the tomatoes and "chop" them with the spatula…. toss in the basil….stir…. wait 5 to 10 min (to let the flavours mix)…. toss the zuke on top of the mix, turn down to a simmer, cover and let the mixture steam the zuke until translucent…… just after serving, sprinkle parmesan cheese on top (really), but chop it into 1 inch strips and put it in when you put in the i know this isn’t a recipe, but it’s how i cook (never the same dish twice!) — k t1 13 yrs

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > In fact, that’s a wonderful side-dish right there — stewed tomatoes > > or stewed zuke in tomato sauce.  I’d just add a bit of garlic and some > > basil. > Ok Jude, that sounds like something I’d like to try…I’ve got garlic > bulbs, roma tomatos and I’ll pick up some fresh basil leaves and and a > zuchinni…should I get a can of tomato sauce?…can you explain to a > newbie how you go about "stewing" tomatos and zuke ? Do I just empty the > can of tom sauce in a pot/pan, heat it, slice the zuke and tom and put > them in there and let simmer until the zuke is is tender ?  the tomato > starts out soft, so what do i look for there ? > -Adrian > Raleigh, NC > Adrian….. from the culinary challenged department…. i chop up the > onions, smash the garlic, put them in a deep sided fry pan, cook at high > stirring constantly until the onions are translucent….throw in the > tomatoes and "chop" them with the spatula…. toss in the basil….stir…. > wait 5 to 10 min (to let the flavours mix)…. toss the zuke on top of the > mix, turn down to a simmer, cover and let the mixture steam the zuke until > translucent…… just after serving, sprinkle parmesan cheese on top > (really), but chop it into 1 inch strips and put it in when you put in the > i know this isn’t a recipe, but it’s how i cook (never the same dish twice!)

It’s a wonderful recipe, K, some of the best are a little bit of this, a pinch of that.   You explained it just right.   Parmesan goes very well with zuchinni.  I don’t think there is one recipe I can absolutely duplicate a second time.  But then I’m not a chef.  I can make something good 97% of the time.  The other 3%?  It’ll still be healthy, but I might not keep the leftovers. It is good to experiment with cooking the foods that are on your most- desirable foods.  It does not have to be a recognized recipe.  There are some awful combinations of good foods, but lucky we seldom find them. Hungarian paprika is a wonderful herb.  I use it in a lot of dishes. It is mildly hot, and it causes meats to brown wonderfully.  Depending where you get it, it can be hot and spicy.  Consider it a flour as it causes the sauce to thicken.  I don’t know the nutritional values, but it is a flour made from peppers. PS: Thanks for the warm fuzzies in your email message.  I’m just a bit fried right now.  I think I’m doing alright, but I might need your help in the next few days. Best health to all. Jude —         Crouch Enterprises – Telecom, Internet & Unix Consulting z       Oak Park, IL  708-848-0134  URL: http://www.pobox.com/~jcrouch

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > > In fact, that’s a wonderful side-dish right there — stewed tomatoes > > > or stewed zuke in tomato sauce.  I’d just add a bit of garlic and some > > > basil. > > Ok Jude, that sounds like something I’d like to try…I’ve got garlic > > bulbs, roma tomatos and I’ll pick up some fresh basil leaves and and a > > zuchinni…should I get a can of tomato sauce?…can you explain to a > > newbie how you go about "stewing" tomatos and zuke ? Do I just empty the > > can of tom sauce in a pot/pan, heat it, slice the zuke and tom and put > > them in there and let simmer until the zuke is is tender ?  the tomato > > starts out soft, so what do i look for there ? > > -Adrian > > Raleigh, NC > Adrian….. from the culinary challenged department…. i chop up the > onions, smash the garlic, put them in a deep sided fry pan, cook at high > stirring constantly until the onions are translucent….throw in the > tomatoes and "chop" them with the spatula…. toss in the basil….stir…. > wait 5 to 10 min (to let the flavours mix)…. toss the zuke on top of the > mix, turn down to a simmer, cover and let the mixture steam the zuke until > translucent…… just after serving, sprinkle parmesan cheese on top > (really), but chop it into 1 inch strips and put it in when you put in the > i know this isn’t a recipe, but it’s how i cook (never the same dish twice!) > — > k t1 13 yrs > Thanks J & TL! > The grocer was out of zuke, so I bought yellow squash.  Cook the same > way ? > "smash the garlic", I’ll have to try that.  So far I’ve always sliced > it.  Somebody (probably Jude) said to use the side of the knife blade. > I’ve always started by heating up some olive oil and adding the onions & > garlic, but it sounds like we’re not using oil here, just putting the > onions and garlic straight in a hot empty pan ? won’t they burn ? > should I add water ?

Use some spray, in the USA we have PAM.  Or use olive oil.  PAM is (I think) lecithin.  Remember that you *should* have some fats (oil). (Fats help in your digestion and keep your joints lubricated.) > the basil is in the form of whole green leaves – I guess I need to > chop/cut it up ?

Yes, I would chop it a bit, but it could be added as whole leaves. Basil is another of those herbs that we can grow on our windowsill all year long.  The key again is to trim the plant often, even if you don’t use the trimmings.  Basil grows fairly tall, so you want to "tame" the plant to be shorter.  By trimming you prevent the plant from going to seed.  Once it goes to seed, it gets bitter. Basil+garlic=pesto.  It’s a wonderful flavor to add to many foods. Best eating. Jude —         Crouch Enterprises – Telecom, Internet & Unix Consulting       Oak Park, IL  708-848-0134  URL: http://www.pobox.com/~jcrouch

Response:

> > i know this isn’t a recipe, but it’s how i cook (never the same dish twice!) > It’s a wonderful recipe, K, some of the best are a little bit of this, a > pinch of that.   You explained it just right.   Parmesan goes very well > with zuchinni.  I don’t think there is one recipe I can absolutely > duplicate a second time.  But then I’m not a chef.  I can make something > good 97% of the time.  The other 3%?  It’ll still be healthy, but I might > not keep the leftovers.

ROTFL!!! Jude…. you’re soo much better than i….97% is edible…well, maybe better than that, the other 3%…. order out fast!!! > It is good to experiment with cooking the foods that are on your most- > desirable foods.  It does not have to be a recognized recipe.  There > are some awful combinations of good foods, but lucky we seldom find them.

so far, not so bad…. and there’s always take out > Hungarian paprika is a wonderful herb.  I use it in a lot of dishes. > It is mildly hot, and it causes meats to brown wonderfully.  Depending > where you get it, it can be hot and spicy.  Consider it a flour as > it causes the sauce to thicken.  I don’t know the nutritional values, > but it is a flour made from peppers.

oohhhh….. i didn’t know that…. i do know that i can take day 1 english stew, add the hungarian paprika and have day 2 hungarian goulash (well…..)…, and if there is still left overs on day 3 add white peppers and serve over oodles of noodles……or rice or smashed taters or….. the continuing pot of food that turns into something else every day is my "area of ?specialty?"….. once i’m on to a good batch of whatever, may as well run with it, eh? also, i tend to be allergic to most of the peppers except orange and white, so perhaps being a flour i can tolerate it?? i wonder what the difference is? > PS: Thanks for the warm fuzzies in your email message.  I’m just a bit > fried right now.  I think I’m doing alright, but I might need your help in > the next few days.

harumph! <vbg>…. i did ask for some info…… and then came back here and thought "how stupid, Kate….it was under your nose the entire time"…… there is always tommorrow…. i’m picking up Momma Tibbie on Saturday and i’ll be back to bug you on Sunday…. > Best health to all. > Jude

ps…. i would have NOT posted if i had seen your reply….. cooking is NOT my thang!… EATING is my forte! — k t1 13 yrs

Response:

I have often thanked my genes…… I have never had problems with kidneys, etc but I’m not an addict, either. Generally I think both Atkins and Bernstein had some good ideas and much of the conventional wisdom is ….unwise? (A couple of days in the hospital on a "diabetic" diet convinced me of THAT.) Moderation in everything. Some in the group have the ability to stick to a regime.  Some don’t.  Some need to and some don’t.  I just think that "low carb" needn’t be a strait jacket but can be a source of good ideas and good recipes. Nan, Type 2

Response:

> hmmm, your answer poses questions for me.  With > insulin, a diabetic can consume what is considered a > ‘normal’ amount of carbs in their diet?  Then why > aren’t more people on insulin instead of trying so hard > to maintain a rigid diet extreme?

Well, for me, I worry about the negative consequences of high amounts of insulin in the system.  My understanding is that it’s bad for the heart. It’s also much easier, I think, to just eat low carb than have to mess around with calculating how much carb I’ve eaten, when it will hit my blood stream, which of various insulins I should inject when… I prefer to keep it simple.   In addition, I’m trying to lose a little weight, not gain it, and eating whatever I please and shooting insulin to cover is a great way to gain weight. Priscilla — The Episcopal Church welcomes you… and you… and you….

Response:

> I realize that the protein and fat subject borders on being a religious > subject, so I’ll just stick to my "beliefs" and not foment an argument. >Maybe maybe not.. depends on the person.  Taking insulin is not enough for >many because their problem is they are insulin resistant. > Maybe I’m wrong, but I thought all T2 was insulin resistance – at least until > the beta cells burn out.  Wrong??

I don’t think so.  You might be producing some but not enough insulin.  You might be producing plenty of insulin but have insulin resistance.  Both are considered type 2.  If you produce no insulin you are type 1. — Type 2 http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’ve noticed many people on this forum recommending a low carbo diet for > diabetics. > I’ve also seen it written that diabetics should avoid high protein due > to potential kidney damage, which can be a serious problem for > diabetics. > And we all know that excess fats, particularly animal fats, are very > dangerous to the cardio-vascular system. > So if one eats low fat, low protein and low carbo, what’s left to eat? > Gravel? > I’m personally sort of vegetarian and therefore I eat fairly high > carbo.  I can certainly see the advantages of eating less carbo and > using less insulin, but this choice seems healthier to me. > For someone who’s on pills or just using diet and exercise, I imagine > that avoiding carbo would make more sense.  But I almost wonder if it > would be healthier to just give in and take insulin. > I was fighting with using pills and using d&e till fairly recently. > Since I went on insulin – and particularly since I got some extremely > astute advice from Old Al – I’ve been running some really good numbers. > That’s only been about 2 weeks, so I don’t have any A1Cs to brag about, > but I’m hoping to in a few months. > That rambled.  Sorry. > Jon

Hi there Jon, Diet is a life style choice, and not one that most of us like to question.  You need to eat what best suits you. However, there are a few things that you need to be fully aware of. Some divide what is called vegetarian eating into two classes, Vegetarians (mostly vegetable source food with a little animal sourced food) and Vegans (absolutely no animal sourced food at all). Then there’s the ovo-vegetarians (eggs allowed), and so on, with many variations.  Some allow fish, others chicken, or dairy, and so on. So the question is, where do you lie in this sliding scale?  Because if you opt for the Vegan approach, there are certain nutrition essentials that need to be allowed and compensated for.  As Julie mentioned, insufficient iron can lead to anaemia.  Meat contains certain ESSENTIAL amino acids, and other important nutriments.  Note the emphasis on essential. One has to seek out suitable substitutes to replace the missing elements.  The religious group, Seventh Day Adventists, have been at this for some time, and can give some helpful ideas for a balanced diet. (This is not intended as any kind of religious comment or advocacy.)  Some people eat soy as a protein substitute.  There’s things to consider and learn if one wants to maintain good health. As for Type 2, yes you are corrrect, it is basically an insulin resistance problem, and the injection of insulin does help overcome the resistance by sheer quantity of free circulating insulin. The resistance however, remains.  One question that may be relevant in your case, is whether you are truly a T2, or a late developing T1. Only time and a good doctor can determine this. Your carbohydrate intake sounds reasonable to me, but do try to avoid those fast acting ones, or the excessive intake of any carbs. Even a T1 on insulin can develop insulin resistance if they have too high a level of carb intake!  Some people have called this T3.  A double whammy that is much better avoided.  Exercise is always a good idea for both T1’s and T2’s, as well. As Old Al says, muscles are like gold for a diabetic. I notice that you say; > I’ve also seen it written that diabetics should avoid high protein due > to potential kidney damage, which can be a serious problem for > diabetics. > And we all know that excess fats, particularly animal fats, are very > dangerous to the cardio-vascular system.

and then move straight to; > So if one eats low fat, low protein and low carbo, what’s left to

eat? How about a middle ground?  Like a MODERATE amount of protein, fats and carbs?    Not excessive, not "low"?  Why must it be one extreme or the other? What’s more, there are OILS that have been shown to actually improve the health of the cardio-vascular system, like the ones found in cold-water fish, or vegetable ones like olive oil or in avocados or nuts  They are still classed as "fats", but good ones.  Lean meat contains minimal amounts of saturated fats, and recent research is now not so sure that they are as bad as once believed.  Eggs were once a "baddy", now they are recommended in moderation. I like the moderation in all things approach.  An old idea, but a goodie still. Annette — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

Is there a way to determine which you are doing? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I realize that the protein and fat subject borders on being a religious > subject, so I’ll just stick to my "beliefs" and not foment an argument. > >Maybe maybe not.. depends on the person.  Taking insulin is not enough > for > >many because their problem is they are insulin resistant. > Maybe I’m wrong, but I thought all T2 was insulin resistance – at least > until > the beta cells burn out.  Wrong?? > I don’t think so.  You might be producing some but not enough insulin.  You > might be producing plenty of insulin but have insulin resistance.  Both are > considered type 2.  If you produce no insulin you are type 1. > — > Type 2 > http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

> The Veggie burgers were "Amy’s" from Trader Joe’s.

I haven’t tried those.  I do love that brand of cheese enchiladas though. Just wish they were easier to find! — Type 2 http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

Would she have been better off without insulin?  I think the operative words here are "ate anything she wanted." – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > My grandmother was one who thought she would use the miracles of modern > chemistry to control her BG.  She ate anything she wanted and constantly > tested to see how much insulin she needed.  She also went blind, had her > legs amputated, and died well before her time.  I wish she was still around. > Bob > > hmmm, your answer poses questions for me.  With > > insulin, a diabetic can consume what is considered a > > ‘normal’ amount of carbs in their diet?  Then why > > aren’t more people on insulin instead of trying so hard > > to maintain a rigid diet extreme? > Well, for me, I worry about the negative consequences of high amounts of > insulin in the system.  My understanding is that it’s bad for the heart. > It’s also much easier, I think, to just eat low carb than have to mess > around with calculating how much carb I’ve eaten, when it will hit my > blood stream, which of various insulins I should inject when… I prefer > to keep it simple. > In addition, I’m trying to lose a little weight, not gain it, and eating > whatever I please and shooting insulin to cover is a great way to gain > weight. > Priscilla > — > The Episcopal Church welcomes you… and you… and you….

Response:

Is there a particular bad side to Metformin? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->… I’m still confused about insulin resistance.  I thought all >type 2s, including myself, had insulin resistance.  I thought >the extra injected insulin just overcame the resistance. > Hey Jon, > Well many Type 2’s do have insulin resistance at first.  You reduce > the insulin resistance, and what you have left, is a person with > easier control. Many find that it’s as simple as losing as little as > 10% of their current weight, that does away with some or even all of > their insulin resistance. I found that for me, losing weight, has > helped a lot in my insulin resistance. I can eat more carbs today, > than I could a year ago. >I may be eating a lot of carbos but I’m concentrating on finding the slow >ones. I eat a lot of brown rice and beans.  My bgs are good afterward, but >nobody wants to be in the same room as me.  Tonite my veggie burgers and >other veggie junk was slow enough that my 2 hour reading was way higher that >my one hour reading! A first. > Ah  this tends to happen from time to time. And you can’t always > figure out why. Might be the liver released a little extra glucose, > might be you had a few more carbs that you thought, might be > gremlins. > Are these home made veggie burgers or the Garden/Boca burger type? I > would like to find a good home made type veggies burger that’s not > too hard to make, so I can do a few up at a time, and have something > quick and easy. And while the farmers markets are still going, now > would be a good time to stock up. Heck even a different/better > version of a store bought veggie burger would nice as well. > — > Terrell > type 2, dumped the metformin > now seeing how well I do without it.

Response:

The Veggie burgers were "Amy’s" from Trader Joe’s. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->… I’m still confused about insulin resistance.  I thought all >type 2s, including myself, had insulin resistance.  I thought >the extra injected insulin just overcame the resistance. > Hey Jon, > Well many Type 2’s do have insulin resistance at first.  You reduce > the insulin resistance, and what you have left, is a person with > easier control. Many find that it’s as simple as losing as little as > 10% of their current weight, that does away with some or even all of > their insulin resistance. I found that for me, losing weight, has > helped a lot in my insulin resistance. I can eat more carbs today, > than I could a year ago. >I may be eating a lot of carbos but I’m concentrating on finding the slow >ones. I eat a lot of brown rice and beans.  My bgs are good afterward, but >nobody wants to be in the same room as me.  Tonite my veggie burgers and >other veggie junk was slow enough that my 2 hour reading was way higher that >my one hour reading! A first. > Ah  this tends to happen from time to time. And you can’t always > figure out why. Might be the liver released a little extra glucose, > might be you had a few more carbs that you thought, might be > gremlins. > Are these home made veggie burgers or the Garden/Boca burger type? I > would like to find a good home made type veggies burger that’s not > too hard to make, so I can do a few up at a time, and have something > quick and easy. And while the farmers markets are still going, now > would be a good time to stock up. Heck even a different/better > version of a store bought veggie burger would nice as well. > — > Terrell > type 2, dumped the metformin > now seeing how well I do without it.

Response:

>I have often thanked my genes…… >I have never had problems with kidneys, etc but I’m not an addict, either. >Generally I think both Atkins and Bernstein had some good ideas and much of the >conventional wisdom is ….unwise? (A couple of days in the hospital on a >"diabetic" diet convinced me of THAT.) >Moderation in everything. >Some in the group have the ability to stick to a regime.  Some don’t.  Some >need to and some don’t.  I just think that "low carb" needn’t be a strait >jacket but can be a source of good ideas and good recipes. >Nan, Type 2

and also your: " I DO NOT, NEVER, EVER, WANT TO BE ON SHOTS.  So – I try to be reasonable. The best advice I ever had was to think: SUGAR=CARBS=TROUBLE. I can’t eat beans or potatos or white bread but whole wheat occasionally, lots of vegetables, and meat, cheese, eggs – even cream on the occasional treat of blueberries or blackberries.  No problems at all with kidneys or liver.  I don’t think all the "experts" are as expert as they think." Hi Nan. You and I think so alike on this it’s scary – how do you see inside my head? Although, with T2 and CLL I don’t really thank my genes:-) Cheers – Alan

Response:

My grandmother was one who thought she would use the miracles of modern chemistry to control her BG.  She ate anything she wanted and constantly tested to see how much insulin she needed.  She also went blind, had her legs amputated, and died well before her time.  I wish she was still around. Bob

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> hmmm, your answer poses questions for me.  With > insulin, a diabetic can consume what is considered a > ‘normal’ amount of carbs in their diet?  Then why > aren’t more people on insulin instead of trying so hard > to maintain a rigid diet extreme? > Well, for me, I worry about the negative consequences of high amounts of > insulin in the system.  My understanding is that it’s bad for the heart. > It’s also much easier, I think, to just eat low carb than have to mess > around with calculating how much carb I’ve eaten, when it will hit my > blood stream, which of various insulins I should inject when… I prefer > to keep it simple. > In addition, I’m trying to lose a little weight, not gain it, and eating > whatever I please and shooting insulin to cover is a great way to gain > weight. > Priscilla > — > The Episcopal Church welcomes you… and you… and you….

Response:

>I was diagnosed in my 60s…Type 2, fairly typical.  Sugar testing usually runs >between 90 and 110 (altho I can run it up to 160 by pigging out!).   >I DO NOT, NEVER, EVER, WANT TO BE ON SHOTS.  So – I try to be reasonable. >The best advice I ever had was to think: SUGAR=CARBS=TROUBLE. >I can’t eat beans or potatos or white bread but whole wheat occasionally, lots >of vegetables, and meat, cheese, eggs – even cream on the occasional treat of >blueberries or blackberries.  No problems at all with kidneys or liver.   >I don’t think all the "experts" are as expert as they think. >Nan, Type 2 since 1990 or so.

I have both problems.  My understanding is if you have a problem these touted diets can be a problem.  Many diabetics do have these problems that are undiagnosed. I dread the thought of gong on the machine.  If anyone has read my posts I am not a fan of Atkins and Bernie. I have no doubt that low carb will provide immediate results and is easy.  I am worried about other aspects that become an issue later. Just an unimportant opinion.                                                   Guy

Response:

I was diagnosed in my 60s…Type 2, fairly typical.  Sugar testing usually runs between 90 and 110 (altho I can run it up to 160 by pigging out!).   I DO NOT, NEVER, EVER, WANT TO BE ON SHOTS.  So – I try to be reasonable. The best advice I ever had was to think: SUGAR=CARBS=TROUBLE. I can’t eat beans or potatos or white bread but whole wheat occasionally, lots of vegetables, and meat, cheese, eggs – even cream on the occasional treat of blueberries or blackberries.  No problems at all with kidneys or liver.   I don’t think all the "experts" are as expert as they think. Nan, Type 2 since 1990 or so.

Response:

> I realize that the protein and fat subject borders on being a religious subject, so I’ll just stick to my "beliefs" and not foment an argument. >Maybe maybe not.. depends on the person.  Taking insulin is not enough for many because their problem is they are insulin resistant. > Maybe I’m wrong, but I thought all T2 was insulin resistance – at least until > the beta cells burn out.  Wrong??

Many type 2 had or have hyperinsulinemia due to insulin resistance – part of syndrome X or metabolic syndrome. Consequently, some type 2 produce more insulin than normies. Since I lost about 40 lbs., I believe my insulin resistance has been greatly reduced. I would venture to say that the type 2s that control with diet and exercise would generally have reduced their insulin resistance substantially. Nevertheless, there is a genetic predisposition toward insulin in the offspring of type 2s whether they are slim or fat. Frank

Response:

I realize that the protein and fat subject borders on being a religious subject, so I’ll just stick to my "beliefs" and not foment an argument. >Maybe maybe not.. depends on the person.  Taking insulin is not enough for >many because their problem is they are insulin resistant.

Maybe I’m wrong, but I thought all T2 was insulin resistance – at least until the beta cells burn out.  Wrong?? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’ve noticed many people on this forum recommending a low carbo diet for > diabetics. > I’ve also seen it written that diabetics should avoid high protein due > to potential kidney damage, which can be a serious problem for > diabetics. > High protein can be bad for "damaged kidneys" it does not damage healthy > kidneys > And we all know that excess fats, particularly animal fats, are very > dangerous to the cardio-vascular system. > We do? Recent research seems to question that. > So if one eats low fat, low protein and low carbo, what’s left to eat? > Gravel? > Don’t eat "low" fat or protein then > I’m personally sort of vegetarian and therefore I eat fairly high carbo. >  I can certainly see the advantages of eating less carbo and using less > insulin, but this choice seems healthier to me. > If you are sucessful why would you change? The point is don’t get it in > your mind that your diet is more healthy than someone else’s. > For someone who’s on pills or just using diet and exercise, I imagine > that avoiding carbo would make more sense.  But I almost wonder if it > would be healthier to just give in and take insulin. > Maybe maybe not.. depends on the person.  Taking insulin is not enough for > many because their problem is they are insulin resistant. > I was fighting with using pills and using d&e till fairly recently. > Since I went on insulin – and particularly since I got some extremely > astute advice from Old Al – I’ve been running some really good numbers. > That’s only been about 2 weeks, so I don’t have any A1Cs to brag about, > but I’m hoping to in a few months. > That rambled.  Sorry. > No problem..

Response:

hmmm, your answer poses questions for me.  With insulin, a diabetic can consume what is considered a ‘normal’ amount of carbs in their diet?  Then why aren’t more people on insulin instead of trying so hard to maintain a rigid diet extreme? Bonita

> This is one of those threads that could easily get

heated — it’s close to a > religious conversation. > Regarding protein:  I’m not aware of any research

that shows that diabetics > in control are at a higher risk of kidney disease than the general > population. > Regarding fat:  There is research that shows that a

low-carb, moderate fat > diet improves cardiovascular factors:

http://www.medicinedirect.com/journal/journal/article?acronym=AJM&for… > (you’ll probably have to cut and paste the link

carefully to get the whole > article) > Regarding carbohydrate:  Diabetics know what damage too many carbs can > cause. > You should do what works for you — I try to eat as

many carbs as I can and > stay within my target of <110 before meals and <120 2 hours after meals. > That gives me a diet that’s roughly 30% carbs and the remainder coming > usually equally from fats & proteins (somewhat

weighted towards fats). > If you want to keep to 60% carbs, I think insulin is

a good idea and hope it > works well for you. > — > T2 – HbA1c: 4.7% > http://www.bollar.org/diabetes.htm > I’ve noticed many people on this forum recommending

a low carbo diet for > diabetics. > I’ve also seen it written that diabetics should

avoid high protein due > to potential kidney damage, which can be a serious problem for > diabetics. > And we all know that excess fats, particularly

animal fats, are very > dangerous to the cardio-vascular system. > So if one eats low fat, low protein and low carbo, what’s left to eat? > Gravel? > I’m personally sort of vegetarian and therefore I eat fairly high > carbo.  I can certainly see the advantages of

eating less carbo and > using less insulin, but this choice seems healthier to me. > For someone who’s on pills or just using diet and exercise, I imagine > that avoiding carbo would make more sense.  But I almost wonder if it > would be healthier to just give in and take insulin. > I was fighting with using pills and using d&e till fairly recently. > Since I went on insulin – and particularly since I got some extremely > astute advice from Old Al – I’ve been running some

really good numbers. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> That’s only been about 2 weeks, so I don’t have any A1Cs to brag about, > but I’m hoping to in a few months.

Response:

> Maybe I’m wrong, but I thought all T2 was insulin resistance – at least until > the beta cells burn out.  Wrong??

I think the problem is the degree of resistance.

Response:

> I’ve found baked potatoes, slobbered with salsa and hot > sauce, to be a pretty decent, not too fast carbo.  I can also get away with > french toast with really seedy whole wheat bread.  And I found real maple syrup > to be noticably slower than the fake stuff – but I’m not recommending this.

baked potato is like sugar for the most part, real fast.. butter would slow it a bit.. salsa would not.. French Toast? Not even gonna comment..

Response:

>> I’ve found baked potatoes, slobbered with salsa and hot > sauce, to be a pretty decent, not too fast carbo.  I can also get away with > french toast with really seedy whole wheat bread.  And I found real maple syrup > to be noticably slower than the fake stuff – but I’m not recommending this. >baked potato is like sugar for the most part, real fast.. butter would >slow it a bit.. salsa would not.. >French Toast? >Not even gonna comment..

I get an odd one with mashed spuds. Like many here, straight mashed potato to me is like eating raw sugar as far as my meter goes; if I had a half-cup for breakfast (even with oil as hash browns) I go over 10 (180), same as a slice of toast with butter/marg. However, if I make up salmon patties for breakfast (cup of mash potato, 100g salmon, 30g cheese, chopped onion/peppers/herbs/ and dry fry as burgers, makes four, eat two) I hardly ever go over 6.5 (115). I realise the fat in the cheese and the oil in the salmon have some effect – but it’s a pretty dramatic difference. Any experts able to tell me why? Cheers – Alan

Response:

Thank you.  I clearly need to bone up on triglycerides.  I’m still confused about insulin resistance.  I thought all type 2s, including myself, had insulin resistance.  I thought the extra injected insulin just overcame the resistance. I may be eating a lot of carbos but I’m concentrating on finding the slow ones. I eat a lot of brown rice and beans.  My bgs are good afterward, but nobody wants to be in the same room as me.  Tonite my veggie burgers and other veggie junk was slow enough that my 2 hour reading was way higher that my one hour reading! A first. Someone, I think you, mentioned that some supposedly fast carbos aren’t that fast – like potatoes.  I’ve found baked potatoes, slobbered with salsa and hot sauce, to be a pretty decent, not too fast carbo.  I can also get away with french toast with really seedy whole wheat bread.  And I found real maple syrup to be noticably slower than the fake stuff – but I’m not recommending this. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’ve noticed many people on this forum recommending a low carbo diet for > diabetics. > I’ve also seen it written that diabetics should avoid high protein due > to potential kidney damage, which can be a serious problem for > diabetics. > And we all know that excess fats, particularly animal fats, are very > dangerous to the cardio-vascular system. > So if one eats low fat, low protein and low carbo, what’s left to eat? > Gravel? > That’s why there’s no one diet that works for all of us. > I’m personally sort of vegetarian and therefore I eat fairly high > carbo.  I can certainly see the advantages of eating less carbo and > using less insulin, but this choice seems healthier to me. > I used to be a vegetarian, but found it difficult to eat that way as a > diabetic.  I don’t use insulin.  I also had terrible trouble with anemia > since being diagnosed with diabetes, so finally began attempting to eat meat > twice a week.  I still eat mainly vegetarian meals though. > For someone who’s on pills or just using diet and exercise, I imagine > that avoiding carbo would make more sense.  But I almost wonder if it > would be healthier to just give in and take insulin. > I don’t avoid carbs.  In fact, I eat more carbs than many here.  But less > carbs than I used to.  The problem is if you have type 2 like I do, you > can’t *just* take insulin.  Many of us type 2s have insulin resistance.  Our > bodies produce enough insulin, but we can’t use it effectively.  So adding > insulin isn’t always the answer.  There are just too many variables to this > darned thing!  Also, many of us type 2s have a problem with high > triglycerides, and this is exacerbated by eating too many carbs, > particularly of the refined variety. > I was fighting with using pills and using d&e till fairly recently. > Since I went on insulin – and particularly since I got some extremely > astute advice from Old Al – I’ve been running some really good numbers. > That’s only been about 2 weeks, so I don’t have any A1Cs to brag about, > but I’m hoping to in a few months. > That’s great!  I’m glad you found something that worked for you. > — > Type 2 > http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

The issue of diets is confusing.  It seem to be more opinions than scientific facts.   It is made more complex by the variety of commercial operations publishing diets to make a buck. I have no idea what the perfect diet would be,  So I pick a "variety food consumption" that seems to be reasonable.   BUT as a diabetic I limit quantities to what is indicated for me. I have given up "entertainment eating".   It usually leads to excesses.  That is for the people that be diabetics in the future. There is no one diet or system that fits everyone. We need to talk about the merits of each food without a gross bias.  From the information we make our,choices and live with what happens.  Like most of life.                                      Guy

Response:

> I’ve noticed many people on this forum recommending a low carbo diet for > diabetics. > I’ve also seen it written that diabetics should avoid high protein due > to potential kidney damage, which can be a serious problem for > diabetics. > And we all know that excess fats, particularly animal fats, are very > dangerous to the cardio-vascular system. > So if one eats low fat, low protein and low carbo, what’s left to eat? > Gravel?

That’s why there’s no one diet that works for all of us. > I’m personally sort of vegetarian and therefore I eat fairly high > carbo.  I can certainly see the advantages of eating less carbo and > using less insulin, but this choice seems healthier to me.

I used to be a vegetarian, but found it difficult to eat that way as a diabetic.  I don’t use insulin.  I also had terrible trouble with anemia since being diagnosed with diabetes, so finally began attempting to eat meat twice a week.  I still eat mainly vegetarian meals though. > For someone who’s on pills or just using diet and exercise, I imagine > that avoiding carbo would make more sense.  But I almost wonder if it > would be healthier to just give in and take insulin.

I don’t avoid carbs.  In fact, I eat more carbs than many here.  But less carbs than I used to.  The problem is if you have type 2 like I do, you can’t *just* take insulin.  Many of us type 2s have insulin resistance.  Our bodies produce enough insulin, but we can’t use it effectively.  So adding insulin isn’t always the answer.  There are just too many variables to this darned thing!  Also, many of us type 2s have a problem with high triglycerides, and this is exacerbated by eating too many carbs, particularly of the refined variety. > I was fighting with using pills and using d&e till fairly recently. > Since I went on insulin – and particularly since I got some extremely > astute advice from Old Al – I’ve been running some really good numbers. > That’s only been about 2 weeks, so I don’t have any A1Cs to brag about, > but I’m hoping to in a few months.

That’s great!  I’m glad you found something that worked for you. — Type 2 http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

> I’ve noticed many people on this forum recommending a low carbo diet for > diabetics. > I’ve also seen it written that diabetics should avoid high protein due > to potential kidney damage, which can be a serious problem for > diabetics.

High protein can be bad for "damaged kidneys" it does not damage healthy kidneys > And we all know that excess fats, particularly animal fats, are very > dangerous to the cardio-vascular system.

We do? Recent research seems to question that. > So if one eats low fat, low protein and low carbo, what’s left to eat? > Gravel?

Don’t eat "low" fat or protein then > I’m personally sort of vegetarian and therefore I eat fairly high carbo. >  I can certainly see the advantages of eating less carbo and using less > insulin, but this choice seems healthier to me.

If you are sucessful why would you change? The point is don’t get it in your mind that your diet is more healthy than someone else’s. > For someone who’s on pills or just using diet and exercise, I imagine > that avoiding carbo would make more sense.  But I almost wonder if it > would be healthier to just give in and take insulin.

Maybe maybe not.. depends on the person.  Taking insulin is not enough for many because their problem is they are insulin resistant. > I was fighting with using pills and using d&e till fairly recently. > Since I went on insulin – and particularly since I got some extremely > astute advice from Old Al – I’ve been running some really good numbers. > That’s only been about 2 weeks, so I don’t have any A1Cs to brag about, > but I’m hoping to in a few months. > That rambled.  Sorry.

No problem..

Response:

I’ve noticed many people on this forum recommending a low carbo diet for diabetics. I’ve also seen it written that diabetics should avoid high protein due to potential kidney damage, which can be a serious problem for diabetics. And we all know that excess fats, particularly animal fats, are very dangerous to the cardio-vascular system. So if one eats low fat, low protein and low carbo, what’s left to eat? Gravel? I’m personally sort of vegetarian and therefore I eat fairly high carbo.  I can certainly see the advantages of eating less carbo and using less insulin, but this choice seems healthier to me. For someone who’s on pills or just using diet and exercise, I imagine that avoiding carbo would make more sense.  But I almost wonder if it would be healthier to just give in and take insulin. I was fighting with using pills and using d&e till fairly recently. Since I went on insulin – and particularly since I got some extremely astute advice from Old Al – I’ve been running some really good numbers. That’s only been about 2 weeks, so I don’t have any A1Cs to brag about, but I’m hoping to in a few months. That rambled.  Sorry. Jon

Response:

This is one of those threads that could easily get heated — it’s close to a religious conversation. Regarding protein:  I’m not aware of any research that shows that diabetics in control are at a higher risk of kidney disease than the general population. Regarding fat:  There is research that shows that a low-carb, moderate fat diet improves cardiovascular factors: http://www.medicinedirect.com/journal/journal/article?acronym=AJM&for… (you’ll probably have to cut and paste the link carefully to get the whole article) Regarding carbohydrate:  Diabetics know what damage too many carbs can cause. You should do what works for you — I try to eat as many carbs as I can and stay within my target of <110 before meals and <120 2 hours after meals. That gives me a diet that’s roughly 30% carbs and the remainder coming usually equally from fats & proteins (somewhat weighted towards fats). If you want to keep to 60% carbs, I think insulin is a good idea and hope it works well for you. — T2 – HbA1c: 4.7% http://www.bollar.org/diabetes.htm

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’ve noticed many people on this forum recommending a low carbo diet for > diabetics. > I’ve also seen it written that diabetics should avoid high protein due > to potential kidney damage, which can be a serious problem for > diabetics. > And we all know that excess fats, particularly animal fats, are very > dangerous to the cardio-vascular system. > So if one eats low fat, low protein and low carbo, what’s left to eat? > Gravel? > I’m personally sort of vegetarian and therefore I eat fairly high > carbo.  I can certainly see the advantages of eating less carbo and > using less insulin, but this choice seems healthier to me. > For someone who’s on pills or just using diet and exercise, I imagine > that avoiding carbo would make more sense.  But I almost wonder if it > would be healthier to just give in and take insulin. > I was fighting with using pills and using d&e till fairly recently. > Since I went on insulin – and particularly since I got some extremely > astute advice from Old Al – I’ve been running some really good numbers. > That’s only been about 2 weeks, so I don’t have any A1Cs to brag about, > but I’m hoping to in a few months.

Response:

I am a type 2 diabetic. Diagnosed a year or so ago. Does it matter how you get your carbs if your testing is within tolerance? I am not talking about fat, other than fat. For example, is it ok to have a piece of cake if your bs reading is still ok? Can this be a long term problem if repeated often even if your weight stays ok? I am on the diet and exercise control and doing ok.

Response:

when you ad cake to your diet you are taking away other more nutritional foods.  so do it with caution. the best advice I can give you is to ask a dietitian to fit snacks into your diet plan.  good luck to you. http://www.diabetes.org/main/application/commercewf — Sushi-Boy DIABETES for some its a curse for me its a cure – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I am a type 2 diabetic. Diagnosed a year or so ago. > Does it matter how you get your carbs if your testing is within tolerance? I > am not talking about fat, other than fat. > For example, is it ok to have a piece of cake if your bs reading is still > ok? Can this be a long term problem if repeated often even if your weight > stays ok? I am on the diet and exercise control and doing ok.

Response:

>I am a type 2 diabetic. Diagnosed a year or so ago. >Does it matter how you get your carbs if your testing is within tolerance? I >am not talking about fat, other than fat.

Nothing wrong with fat.  It can moderate a spike nicely, just like fiber can. >For example, is it ok to have a piece of cake if your bs reading is still >ok?

Why wouldn’t it be?  If it doesn’t spike you, why not?  (You can really have a piece of cake and not spike, and you’re doing just diet and exercise?  I’m jealous!) > Can this be a long term problem if repeated often even if your weight >stays ok? I am on the diet and exercise control and doing ok.

What does your meter say?  How’s your A1c? That’s the bottom line.  Are you keeping tight control at 1 and 2 hours PP?  How are your fasting numbers?   You’re the one with the most information about your body and how it reacts to various foods. Priscilla — "I would listen to Priscilla. Her advice is excellent!"            – Frankenmel (Sharon) on alt.support.menopause

Response:

> I am a type 2 diabetic. Diagnosed a year or so ago. > Does it matter how you get your carbs if your testing is within tolerance? I > am not talking about fat, other than fat. > For example, is it ok to have a piece of cake if your bs reading is still > ok? Can this be a long term problem if repeated often even if your weight > stays ok? I am on the diet and exercise control and doing ok.

The main concern of any diet should be proper nutrition.  Nobody is giong to tell you that cake is good for you.  But if you can fit it into your diet occasionally and your BG is still fine, then more power to you.  I eat a small piece of chocolate several times a week.  Works for me! — Type 2 http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/ – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –

Response:

> when you ad cake to your diet you are taking away > other more nutritional foods.  so do it with caution. > the best advice I can give you is to ask a dietitian to fit > snacks into your diet plan.  good luck to you.

Again…  Why would he need to ask a dietician about this?  He obviously knows how to fit it in and his BG is fine. — Type 2 http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

> I am a type 2 diabetic. Diagnosed a year or so ago. > Does it matter how you get your carbs if your testing is within tolerance? I > am not talking about fat, other than fat. > For example, is it ok to have a piece of cake if your bs reading is still > ok? Can this be a long term problem if repeated often even if your weight > stays ok? I am on the diet and exercise control and doing ok.

LOL If you do, just don’t brag about it here. That is unless you love being made to feel guilty. — Chuck Prejudice can be divided into pre-judgments (easier than thinking) and bigotry (easier to feel good about oneself when one can push down another group). All outgoing messages checked by Norton AntiVirus.

Response:

Julie, Me too.  I have a half of a Fifty/50 chocolate bar as a "reward" when I do well all week.  (15 g carbs)  Not every week, more like every other week.  I have had no problems with it. It helps me, I don’t feel so "deprived". Linda

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I am a type 2 diabetic. Diagnosed a year or so ago. > Does it matter how you get your carbs if your testing is within tolerance? > I > am not talking about fat, other than fat. > For example, is it ok to have a piece of cake if your bs reading is still > ok? Can this be a long term problem if repeated often even if your weight > stays ok? I am on the diet and exercise control and doing ok. > The main concern of any diet should be proper nutrition.  Nobody is giong to > tell you that cake is good for you.  But if you can fit it into your diet > occasionally and your BG is still fine, then more power to you.  I eat a > small piece of chocolate several times a week.  Works for me! > — > Type 2 > http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

I eat a square of Lindt 70% chocolate every night. It comes in at 2 gms of carbs, tastes wonderful, and doesn’t give me the cravings that sugar alcohols do. It doesn’t do anything to my blood sugar. A single square of Valrhona or Lake Champlain dark chocolate works too. These are such rich yummy chocolates (and so expensive!) that a little bit goes a long way. — Jenny 168.5/145/145  Achieved Second Goal! 9/1998 – 8/2001 and 11/10/02 – Now http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/jennypics.htm  Before and After Photos http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean How to calculate your need for protein * How much people really lose each month *  Water Weight Gain & Loss * The "Two Gram Cure" for Hunger Cravings * Characteristics of Successful Dieters * Indispensible Low Carb Treats * Should You Count that Low Impact Carb? * Curing Ketobreath

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Julie, > Me too.  I have a half of a Fifty/50 chocolate bar as a "reward" when I do > well all week.  (15 g carbs)  Not every week, more like every other week. I > have had no problems with it. > It helps me, I don’t feel so "deprived". > Linda > > I am a type 2 diabetic. Diagnosed a year or so ago. > > Does it matter how you get your carbs if your testing is within > tolerance? > I > > am not talking about fat, other than fat. > > For example, is it ok to have a piece of cake if your bs reading is > still > > ok? Can this be a long term problem if repeated often even if your > weight > > stays ok? I am on the diet and exercise control and doing ok. > The main concern of any diet should be proper nutrition.  Nobody is giong > to > tell you that cake is good for you.  But if you can fit it into your diet > occasionally and your BG is still fine, then more power to you.  I eat a > small piece of chocolate several times a week.  Works for me! > — > Type 2 > http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

> What does your meter say?  How’s your A1c? That’s the bottom line.  Are > you keeping tight control at 1 and 2 hours PP?  How are your fasting numbers?

What is PP?

Response:

I dont believe in deprivation,  If I am then I personally are doomed to fail, Therefore, I portion control,  I will go out for dinner and always have dessert.  I will limit the carbs in the meal and then have about a third of a slice of say cheesecake,  I am almost always within the right range,  Being diabetic doesnt mean giving up living and enjoying as long as you ,modify to fit those carbs into your diet,  I wouldnt eat a whole baked potato and then have a piece of cake, but a third of a potato and a third of a piece of reguar cheesecake is fine,  I find cheesecake is one of the easiest things because there are no crusts,  I am also able to get deicious sugar free cheesecake which does nothing to my numbers. Portion control is what works for me,  Now you have to figure out what works for you. Loretta — In tribute to the United States of America and the State of Israel, two bastions of strength in a world filled with strife and terrorism.

Response:

:> What does your meter say?  How’s your A1c? That’s the bottom line.  Are :> you keeping tight control at 1 and 2 hours PP?  How are your fasting : numbers? :> : What is PP? Post prandial, or after your meal. Wendy Baker

Response:

Post prandial.  After eating.  :-)

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> What is PP?

Response:

PP is post prandial and that means after eating,  We use the number two hours after eating a meal and that shoud be 120 and under to be in a non diabetic state if you are a type II. Loretta — In tribute to the United States of America and the State of Israel, two bastions of strength in a world filled with strife and terrorism.

Response:

Thank you all. I have found a wonderful new resource, this newsgroup,  to help me manage my diabetes. Regards, Jim

Response:

What is the best diet for a normal dog with no medical problems?

Response:

Natural food diet.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> What is the best diet for a normal dog with no medical problems?

Response:

Natural food diet? Is there a website that I can go to for more info Thanks

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Natural food diet. > What is the best diet for a normal dog with no medical problems?

Response:

> Natural food diet? Is there a website that I can go to for > more info

Here’s a good starting point for information on a BARF (Bones and Raw Food) diet:   http://www.barfers.com/ — –Matt.  Rocky’s a Dog.

Response:

I used to give my cats science diet as recommended by my vet.  6 months later my oldest one, about 15 years old died from kidney failure. This was about 5 years ago.  When the senior diet came along I changed my other two cats to this.  A couple of weeks ago I lost another to kidney failure.  She was only 12.  Does anyone have any similar experiences?  It may be coincidental, but a friend also lost her cat after changing to Science diet, and I have now introduced traditional tinned food for one meal for my remaining (and lonely) cat.  My vet denies there is a link between the science diet and kidney failure.  Thanks Lindsay

Response:

I personally doubt that there is a link between feeding the Science brand and your cats’ kidney problems.  However, if you search this newsgroup, you will find there has been some discussion about dry food vs. wet.  Were you feeding only dry food?  There is a growing body of evidence that feeding dry food exclusively increases the probability of a cat developing a urinary tract infection (UTI). However, that increased probability isn’t due to a single type of dry food, although there are some that are better than others. Science is a reasonably good quality food, I believe. So, the next question is what type of kidney failure was involved. Did your cats have chronic renal failure (CRF), or did they develop the problem from a too-far-gone UTI? Left untreated, UTIs will result in a more acute onset renal failure and death. If the UTI scenario was involved, then a dry food diet may have contributed, but not necessarily a particular brand. I hope this info helps – others in this group may have better info to provide. You can learn more about kidney problems at several different web sites. Try: http://maxshouse.com, or http://www.vetinfo.com, or http://members.xoom.com/PKellyDVM/FelineHandouts.htm  All of these sites have lots of good info on a variety of things. I’m sorry to hear about the loss of your cats… Laura Got questions?  Get answers over the phone at Keen.com. Up to 100 minutes free! http://www.keen.com

Response:

Mine have been on Science Diet for ten years, and test fine. There truly is no link to kidney disease or failure and Science Diet. To lose a cat to kidney failure in that time frame, there had to be undiagnosed problems going on for some time. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I used to give my cats science diet as recommended by my vet.  6 months > later my oldest one, about 15 years old died from kidney failure. > This was about 5 years ago.  When the senior diet came along I changed my > other two cats to this.  A couple of weeks ago I lost another to kidney > failure.  She was only 12.  Does anyone have any similar experiences?  It > may be coincidental, but a friend also lost her cat after changing to > Science diet, and I have now introduced traditional tinned food for one meal > for my remaining (and lonely) cat.  My vet denies there is a link between > the science diet and kidney failure.  Thanks Lindsay

Response:

>his was about 5 years ago.  When the senior diet came along I changed my >other two cats to this.  A couple of weeks ago I lost another to kidney >failure.  She was only 12.  Does anyone have any similar experiences?  It >may be coincidental, but a friend also lost her cat after changing to >Science diet, and I have now introduced traditional tinned food for one meal >for my remaining (and lonely) cat.  My vet denies there is a link between >the science diet and kidney failure.  Thanks Lindsay

There is some suspected link between feeding a diet of dry food only, and kidney failure. You are smart to start feeding tinned food as well; this is a better choice to prevent kidney problems. I read about a group of breeders who suspected Science Diet to be responsible for early cancer deaths in many of their cats, because it contains the preservative ethoxyquin, but that’s not actually been proven. yngver (delete "nojunk" to e-mail)

Response:

Can someone suggest what to feed a 12 year old poodle with early kidney disease?.On the Vets suggeston we have allready stopped red meat and are now using special diets.Can we use white meat or fish? without any harm? Thank you. D.S.

Response:

    No you can’t. Any meat added of any kind will increase levels of phosphorous in the diet. Follow the vets advice EXACTLY. The difference is extreme. Renal failure dogs in a recent study fed Prescription Diet k/d lived an average of 594 days post diagnosis. Those fed a normal food lived an average of 188 days. The k/d dogs also had half as many uremic crises over their life spans. This is not the time to disregard the vets advice and play around. Stick to the prescribed diet strictly and without deviation.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Can someone suggest what to feed a 12 year old poodle with early kidney > disease?.On the Vets suggeston we have allready stopped red meat and are now > using special diets.Can we use white meat or fish? without any harm? > Thank you. > D.S.

Response:

> Hi All: > I’ve had a lot of luck by altering my diet over the past few months. I went > from 80% coverage to almost nothing in two months. I came up with this > regime by way of the net and trying to observe my trigger foods. I still > don’t know all my triggers so I decided to keep a daily log of my food > intake, vitamins and "other treatments". I just started but if there’s any > interest I’ll occasionally post the log for review. Let me know if this > sounds interesting to anybody.

Good for you! I get excellent results from diet, myself, and am always interested in anyone else’s observations. Keep them coming. Best wishes, Terry — To e-mail me replace "spamsucks" with "azstarnet.com"

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi All: > I’ve had a lot of luck by altering my diet over the past few months. I went > from 80% coverage to almost nothing in two months. I came up with this > regime by way of the net and trying to observe my trigger foods. I still > don’t know all my triggers so I decided to keep a daily log of my food > intake, vitamins and "other treatments". I just started but if there’s any > interest I’ll occasionally post the log for review. Let me know if this > sounds interesting to anybody. > Brian S > Brian,

Please keep us informed.  I would love to know the results.  It seems that something triggers it off. Regards Rossy Share what you know. Learn what you don’t.

Response:

> I’ve had a lot of luck by altering my diet over the past few months. I went > from 80% coverage to almost nothing in two months. I came up with this > regime by way of the net and trying to observe my trigger foods. I still > don’t know all my triggers so I decided to keep a daily log of my food > intake, vitamins and "other treatments". I just started but if there’s any > interest I’ll occasionally post the log for review. Let me know if this > sounds interesting to anybody.

The details of your diet would be very helpful and greatly appreciated. Andy Kanter http://www.clearskin.com

Response:

I can go 1 day with a diet routine and after that my desires win out… Mmmm , Those yummy Mc.Donalds french fries, and Big Mac…..(I feel like homer simpson.) ANd then those Klondike ice cream bars… THeir

Response:

Well there you have it in a nutshell.  Wheat in the buns, red meat (is it real), a dairy product with caffeine in the chocolate coating……and we musn’t forget a little grease on the fries to make it go down smooth.  Will that be coke or root beer? Seriously though…..I’m the same……every now and then I just have to dive into the junk.  Hey, you have to let go once in a while. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I can go 1 day with a diet routine and after that my desires win out… > Mmmm , Those yummy Mc.Donalds french fries, and Big Mac…..(I feel like > homer simpson.) ANd then those Klondike ice cream bars… THeir

Response:

Hi All: I’ve had a lot of luck by altering my diet over the past few months. I went from 80% coverage to almost nothing in two months. I came up with this regime by way of the net and trying to observe my trigger foods. I still don’t know all my triggers so I decided to keep a daily log of my food intake, vitamins and "other treatments". I just started but if there’s any interest I’ll occasionally post the log for review. Let me know if this sounds interesting to anybody. Brian S

Response:

Brian-      I’d love to hear what you’ve been eating.  I’ve been on the Pagano diet for about 8 weeks and can see results, but am wondering how much I can play around with it and still continue to clear. Thanks-Ellen Share what you know. Learn what you don’t.

Response:

It certainly does.  The more input we get on trigger foods the better. Thomas the German – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hi All: > I’ve had a lot of luck by altering my diet over the past few months. I went > from 80% coverage to almost nothing in two months. I came up with this > regime by way of the net and trying to observe my trigger foods. I still > don’t know all my triggers so I decided to keep a daily log of my food > intake, vitamins and "other treatments". I just started but if there’s any > interest I’ll occasionally post the log for review. Let me know if this > sounds interesting to anybody. > Brian S

Response:

Hi, Dan! >     The quote has been taken out of context. The letter of > help was to a person experiencing extreme itching problems. >     You are correct…acid neutralizing agents were recommended > for itching…not psoriasis.

I don’t know if sodium carbonate (note carbonate, not bicarbonate) would relieve itching. It is simply used to dissolve scales, nothing else. It’s an easy way of doing it. But, of course getting rid of the scaling might relieve the itching when you smoothen the skin with moisturizers afterwards… >     I see much evidence here of people trying deperately to > cope with an aggravating and sometimes debilitating problem… > psoriasis. However, the evidence does not qualify as scientific.

Right, it’s anecdotal experiences more than "evidence"… >    "Seeing is believing."…even scientific evidence can be > inaccurate.

Of course!!! :) >     I hope you are doing well and learn much from some of your > posts.

Ditto! > I plan to try the "sodium bicarbonate" the next time > I itch severely.

I wouldn’t expect too much itch relief from it, since that isn’t what it is used for… But, it works well as a scale dissolver. We call it washing soda here, and we get it in the supermarket. It has nothing to do with baking soda (sodium bicarbonate). It is a cheap remedy. Add 2-3 tablespoons into the bath tub. It also works as a water softener, so it is very comfy to bathe in. Heck, that alone is worth using it :) If you want to try something new for itching, why don’t you go to my homepage, recipe page. There you’ll find the recipe for wheat bran (note: wheat, not oat!) baths. That is certainly worth a try, and is really comfy when the itching is bad. I have enjoyed many of them, and they’re easy to prepare. If your skin is very dry, add some bath oil too. Take care!!! Hope you’re doing well!!!! — Best regards,                 Visit my homepage: Med vennlig hilsen,          <URL:http://home.newmedia.no/flaker/> _Aase Marit_ :) ))))))

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Terry, >      I have seen considerable evidence here that "acid" is a > part of the psoriasis "equation", in many cases. Much testimony > from this group hints at acidosis.(AM’s "sodium bicarbonate baths", > etc.) > Hi, Dan! > My sodium bicarbonate baths don’t help on the P. It simply dissolves the > scales!!! I have never claimed otherwise. > Also, what you see here is not evidence, it really isn’t… It’s only > people’s experience or whatever to call it. Not that experience isn’t > important, it really is, but it sure isn’t evidence!!!! :) > Hope you’re doing well! :) > — > Best regards,                 Visit my homepage: > Med vennlig hilsen,          <URL:http://home.newmedia.no/flaker/> > _Aase Marit_ :) ))))))

11-12-97 Hi AM,     The quote has been taken out of context. The letter of help was to a person experiencing extreme itching problems.     You are correct…acid neutralizing agents were recommended for itching…not psoriasis.     I see much evidence here of people trying deperately to cope with an aggravating and sometimes debilitating problem… psoriasis. However, the evidence does not qualify as scientific.    "Seeing is believing."…even scientific evidence can be inaccurate.     I hope you are doing well and learn much from some of your posts. I plan to try the "sodium bicarbonate" the next time I itch severely.                                         Dan

Response:

>     I hope you are doing well and learn much from some of your > posts. I plan to try the "sodium bicarbonate" the next time > I itch severely.

Dan, next time, take a look at what you’ve been eating and how it may have changed. Years ago, I was told by a derm at U. of Oregon that the itching is an allergic reaction. Best wishes, Terry — Legitimate e-mailers (not spammers) should remove the "spamsucks" and replace it with "azstarnet" in my address.

Response:

> Terry, >      I have seen considerable evidence here that "acid" is a > part of the psoriasis "equation", in many cases. Much testimony > from this group hints at acidosis.(AM’s "sodium bicarbonate baths", > etc.)

Hi, Dan! My sodium bicarbonate baths don’t help on the P. It simply dissolves the scales!!! I have never claimed otherwise. Also, what you see here is not evidence, it really isn’t… It’s only people’s experience or whatever to call it. Not that experience isn’t important, it really is, but it sure isn’t evidence!!!! :) Hope you’re doing well! :) — Best regards,                 Visit my homepage: Med vennlig hilsen,          <URL:http://home.newmedia.no/flaker/> _Aase Marit_ :) ))))))

Response:

>Terry Fenris has a page with a macrobiotic approach that >works well for him. I will find it if you like.

You would find it on my web site, at    http://members.aol.com/psorsite/docs/terry.html but AOL claims to be having "local server problems" at the moment, and my entire site is down.  This really bites. – Dave W. http://members.aol.com/psorsite/

Response:

Hi, Josh Diet’s the only thing that’s ever worked well for me. Here’s a summary of my experience. http://members.aol.com/psorsite/docs/terry.html Best wishes, Terry — To send friendly e-mail, replace "nospam" with "ttowne1" and "emptymind" with "mindspring.

Response:

Chicken-pox? so did I at 10 years of age. Is there a link with this disease possibly? New evidence has recently come up about chickenpox and older people. (see this BBC article on 1st May 2002). http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/newsid_1961000/1961565.stm "Vaccinating children against chickenpox – an idea gaining favour in many countries – could lead to the millions of cases of shingles in older people, say UK researchers" Maybe we get psoriasis instead? Re diet:  I found that non-dairy acidophilus from a health food shop had a great effect on my psoriasis. Maddie

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I have been to a derm, but that was a while ago. I plan on going soon since > my P is more visible now. > I was only sick once in my life: Had chicken pox when I was around a year > old and thats it (and a fever about 3 years ago for 2 days).  I have never > had antibiotics in my life, or any other sort of drug intented to aid > healing (other than aspirin/tylenol for a headache ;-P  ) > Thank you I will check that site out :D > shohei > > >Im a 19 year old… have ‘P’ behind ears and about 4 spots on my scalp. > My > > >mom has been trying to do some research for me on diets. > Hi Shohei, > First a question or two. Did you have strep and take any > antibiotics prior to P onset? Has your P been diagnosed > by a derm? If yes then a diet that aims to restore colon > function is helpful. > Here is the site where i got mine functioning better > which indirectly helps the autoimmunity factors, IMO. > www.thewholewhey.com  ( i would buy the book first > and try to understand it first before making a decision > to go this way.) > > Sorry to hear about anyone your age having even a few spots to worry > > about. > > Regarding diet, the Official Medical Establishment Position is that > > diet has nothing to do with psoriasis. > Right. As most of em don’t do much at all. > Terry Fenris has a page with a macrobiotic approach that > works well for him. I will find it if you like. > > However, the Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Medical Establishment > > has other theories. > Also true and since the alts haven’t any idea how to truly > re-establish good bacteria in the colon via an acidifying > protocol such as www.thewholewhey.com ,they are mostly > worthless. Not that some alt diets followed to ad nauseam > won’t up regulate some healthly changes over a long > period of time. (hence these folks become zealots) > Notice my zealotry for instance with whey as it works, >  and in a much shorter framework. More bang for your > buck in a shorter time frame holds the interest and > with any results keeps you on track. Yet, only the > most serious will be open to this route as few P’s > have found it. > > Here’s the thing.  The Official Medical Establishment doesn’t know > > just what psoriasis is, except that it involves your skin producing > > way too many cells and not differentiating correctly, and that there’s > > inflammation involved from your immune system attacking something, or > > maybe attacking nothing.  Now, just *why* any of this gets going, is > > the $64,000 question. > So, say the secret word and Groucho and his Duck > get the question ready. Why a duck? > > The Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Establishment, on the other > > hand, will tell you exactly what is going on.  Except, they have a > > dozen different stories, and they can’t all be true, and, to put it > > mildly, none have any significant proof behind them. > > So, back to diet. > > It sure seems that many/most people with at least widespread psoriasis > > see some kinds of effects, mostly aggravation, from eating certain > > foods.  That does not mean that those foods *cause* psoriasis, but it > > may be reason enough to avoid them.  A *few* people manage to change > > their diet and find that it helps clear psoriasis significantly.  Our > > local poet laureate Randall claims something of the sort.  Me, I find > > lots of dietary ways to make psoriasis worse, but none to make it > > better. > Darn and i wanted to be pun-ny instead. Pride of Prankenstein. > > The kicker is, even those who do claim that diet helps, or clear, > > psoriasis, tend to disagree on just exactly what foods hurt or help. > > You can google up tons of rantings on this group about it, and other > > stuff all over the web.  Macrobiotic diet might be worth a try.  Maybe > > thirty days isn’t enough.  Or, maybe diet has little or nothing to > > offer. > Yes, well said. It took me for ever to find the razor to > even attempt to walk on it. > > Here’s my advice, worth no more than you’ve paid for it:  eating a > > well-balanced, healthy diet is likely to be a good thing for you, > > psoriasis or not.  Avoiding high-fat, high-sugar, high-carb, > > (high-alcohol) diets would be advisable.  Balance!  Avoiding > > nightshade veggies (tomato, pepper, eggplant (!), potato) is another > > popular one.  Eating less carbs is another theory, but that’s hard if > > you go the macrobiotic direction.  Less red meat and more fish gets > > you a better balance of EFAs.  Go as far down these roads as you like. > Yes, well said. Excess sugar and stress are problems for me first > and dietary omega 6’s and arachidonic Acid (AA) seems to > be a close second. > > More important, make sure you see a real dermatologist now and again, > > except … watch out for those steroid ointments they usually > > recommend first, go easy on those, google up some discussions of > > those.  Get some sun (unless you find it makes it worse — there’s the > > variability of psoriasis again!), that often helps keep things down, > > especially when you just have a few spots. > > Hope some of this helps, good luck to you, if you try any of this and > > you find it helps, it’d be great if you’d post it back here. > Yes, for sure. > And one more site for sugar and AGE’s to chew on. > First a short review: > The accumulating evidence encourages us to consider glucose as not > only the body’s short-term fuel but also a long-term fuel of > atherogenesis. In this view, the sugar becomes harmful through its > transformation into advanced glycation endproducts that not only make > blood vessels inelastic and stenotic but also activate signal pathways > through which long-term inflammation contributes to the pathology. > For intervening, the important points are that the chemical process is > lifelong and spontaneous and that it remains reversible only in its > early stages, becoming progressively less so if it is allowed to > proceed. Our rapidly evolving understanding leads us to the radical > thought that ingestion of preformed glycation end products may be the > worst trigger of vascular diseases. This in turn may imply that among > the known environmental risk factors for atherogenesis, methods of > food preparation must be added to food quantity and composition. As > usual, what is dangerous is excess. At this time in human history, > Western societies overeat. In addition, they have learned to > overprocess their foods beforehand. Alteration of habits, though > difficult, can have the best long-term influence as a preventive > measure, while new drug interventions begin to come into sight. > (For evestm to feast on with the acrylamides as this is > the diet thread.) > randall… less *expensive* free radicals = longer happier life > > J.

— Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

I have been to a derm, but that was a while ago. I plan on going soon since my P is more visible now. I was only sick once in my life: Had chicken pox when I was around a year old and thats it (and a fever about 3 years ago for 2 days).  I have never had antibiotics in my life, or any other sort of drug intented to aid healing (other than aspirin/tylenol for a headache ;-P  ) Thank you I will check that site out :D shohei

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> >Im a 19 year old… have ‘P’ behind ears and about 4 spots on my scalp. My > >mom has been trying to do some research for me on diets. > Hi Shohei, > First a question or two. Did you have strep and take any > antibiotics prior to P onset? Has your P been diagnosed > by a derm? If yes then a diet that aims to restore colon > function is helpful. > Here is the site where i got mine functioning better > which indirectly helps the autoimmunity factors, IMO. > www.thewholewhey.com  ( i would buy the book first > and try to understand it first before making a decision > to go this way.) > Sorry to hear about anyone your age having even a few spots to worry > about. > Regarding diet, the Official Medical Establishment Position is that > diet has nothing to do with psoriasis. > Right. As most of em don’t do much at all. > Terry Fenris has a page with a macrobiotic approach that > works well for him. I will find it if you like. > However, the Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Medical Establishment > has other theories. > Also true and since the alts haven’t any idea how to truly > re-establish good bacteria in the colon via an acidifying > protocol such as www.thewholewhey.com ,they are mostly > worthless. Not that some alt diets followed to ad nauseam > won’t up regulate some healthly changes over a long > period of time. (hence these folks become zealots) > Notice my zealotry for instance with whey as it works, >  and in a much shorter framework. More bang for your > buck in a shorter time frame holds the interest and > with any results keeps you on track. Yet, only the > most serious will be open to this route as few P’s > have found it. > Here’s the thing.  The Official Medical Establishment doesn’t know > just what psoriasis is, except that it involves your skin producing > way too many cells and not differentiating correctly, and that there’s > inflammation involved from your immune system attacking something, or > maybe attacking nothing.  Now, just *why* any of this gets going, is > the $64,000 question. > So, say the secret word and Groucho and his Duck > get the question ready. Why a duck? > The Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Establishment, on the other > hand, will tell you exactly what is going on.  Except, they have a > dozen different stories, and they can’t all be true, and, to put it > mildly, none have any significant proof behind them. > So, back to diet. > It sure seems that many/most people with at least widespread psoriasis > see some kinds of effects, mostly aggravation, from eating certain > foods.  That does not mean that those foods *cause* psoriasis, but it > may be reason enough to avoid them.  A *few* people manage to change > their diet and find that it helps clear psoriasis significantly.  Our > local poet laureate Randall claims something of the sort.  Me, I find > lots of dietary ways to make psoriasis worse, but none to make it > better. > Darn and i wanted to be pun-ny instead. Pride of Prankenstein. > The kicker is, even those who do claim that diet helps, or clear, > psoriasis, tend to disagree on just exactly what foods hurt or help. > You can google up tons of rantings on this group about it, and other > stuff all over the web.  Macrobiotic diet might be worth a try.  Maybe > thirty days isn’t enough.  Or, maybe diet has little or nothing to > offer. > Yes, well said. It took me for ever to find the razor to > even attempt to walk on it. > Here’s my advice, worth no more than you’ve paid for it:  eating a > well-balanced, healthy diet is likely to be a good thing for you, > psoriasis or not.  Avoiding high-fat, high-sugar, high-carb, > (high-alcohol) diets would be advisable.  Balance!  Avoiding > nightshade veggies (tomato, pepper, eggplant (!), potato) is another > popular one.  Eating less carbs is another theory, but that’s hard if > you go the macrobiotic direction.  Less red meat and more fish gets > you a better balance of EFAs.  Go as far down these roads as you like. > Yes, well said. Excess sugar and stress are problems for me first > and dietary omega 6’s and arachidonic Acid (AA) seems to > be a close second. > More important, make sure you see a real dermatologist now and again, > except … watch out for those steroid ointments they usually > recommend first, go easy on those, google up some discussions of > those.  Get some sun (unless you find it makes it worse — there’s the > variability of psoriasis again!), that often helps keep things down, > especially when you just have a few spots. > Hope some of this helps, good luck to you, if you try any of this and > you find it helps, it’d be great if you’d post it back here. > Yes, for sure. > And one more site for sugar and AGE’s to chew on. > First a short review: > The accumulating evidence encourages us to consider glucose as not > only the body’s short-term fuel but also a long-term fuel of > atherogenesis. In this view, the sugar becomes harmful through its > transformation into advanced glycation endproducts that not only make > blood vessels inelastic and stenotic but also activate signal pathways > through which long-term inflammation contributes to the pathology. > For intervening, the important points are that the chemical process is > lifelong and spontaneous and that it remains reversible only in its > early stages, becoming progressively less so if it is allowed to > proceed. Our rapidly evolving understanding leads us to the radical > thought that ingestion of preformed glycation end products may be the > worst trigger of vascular diseases. This in turn may imply that among > the known environmental risk factors for atherogenesis, methods of > food preparation must be added to food quantity and composition. As > usual, what is dangerous is excess. At this time in human history, > Western societies overeat. In addition, they have learned to > overprocess their foods beforehand. Alteration of habits, though > difficult, can have the best long-term influence as a preventive > measure, while new drug interventions begin to come into sight. > (For evestm to feast on with the acrylamides as this is > the diet thread.) > randall… less *expensive* free radicals = longer happier life > J.

Response:

Hi josh(:        I am also a 19 year old…(female) I have just got rid of my 3rd outbreak of guttate psoriasis…it started out like your p …little spots on my scalp…then i was coverd in it the next couple of weeks!!!…I have been into hospital for a month…its not nice): but what can you do……I find that your diet has a lot to do with psoriasis certain foods flare it up.at the moment i am on a strict diet…which seems to help me a hell of a lot i only have about 8 p spots on my body now…….so yes i would say diet helps..cutting things out.Also stress!!!!(: that is a big cause of p…..

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi everyone. > Im a 19 year old… have ‘P’ behind ears and about 4 spots on my scalp. My > mom has been trying to do some research for me on diets. I don’t know what > you people think about diets and its relationship to P. I know I have posted > a message here before and mentioned something about my diet but a person > responded saying it has nothing to do with P. Anyways… getting to the > point: Has anyone tried sticking with  macrobiotic foods? My mother said she > used to eat like that until she got busy, and blah blah blah. She thinks my > "bad" eating habits cause my P to get worse, but I don’t. I have tried not > eating junk food etc for a month with no major results before. > comments/advice greatly appreciated :) > josh

Response:

> >Im a 19 year old… have ‘P’ behind ears and about 4 spots on my scalp. My >mom has been trying to do some research for me on diets.

Hi Shohei, First a question or two. Did you have strep and take any antibiotics prior to P onset? Has your P been diagnosed by a derm? If yes then a diet that aims to restore colon function is helpful. Here is the site where i got mine functioning better which indirectly helps the autoimmunity factors, IMO. www.thewholewhey.com  ( i would buy the book first and try to understand it first before making a decision to go this way.) > Sorry to hear about anyone your age having even a few spots to worry > about.   > Regarding diet, the Official Medical Establishment Position is that > diet has nothing to do with psoriasis.

Right. As most of em don’t do much at all. Terry Fenris has a page with a macrobiotic approach that works well for him. I will find it if you like. > However, the Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Medical Establishment > has other theories.

Also true and since the alts haven’t any idea how to truly re-establish good bacteria in the colon via an acidifying protocol such as www.thewholewhey.com ,they are mostly worthless. Not that some alt diets followed to ad nauseam won’t up regulate some healthly changes over a long period of time. (hence these folks become zealots) Notice my zealotry for instance with whey as it works,  and in a much shorter framework. More bang for your buck in a shorter time frame holds the interest and with any results keeps you on track. Yet, only the most serious will be open to this route as few P’s have found it. > Here’s the thing.  The Official Medical Establishment doesn’t know > just what psoriasis is, except that it involves your skin producing > way too many cells and not differentiating correctly, and that there’s > inflammation involved from your immune system attacking something, or > maybe attacking nothing.  Now, just *why* any of this gets going, is > the $64,000 question.

So, say the secret word and Groucho and his Duck get the question ready. Why a duck?   – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> The Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Establishment, on the other > hand, will tell you exactly what is going on.  Except, they have a > dozen different stories, and they can’t all be true, and, to put it > mildly, none have any significant proof behind them. > So, back to diet. > It sure seems that many/most people with at least widespread psoriasis > see some kinds of effects, mostly aggravation, from eating certain > foods.  That does not mean that those foods *cause* psoriasis, but it > may be reason enough to avoid them.  A *few* people manage to change > their diet and find that it helps clear psoriasis significantly.  Our > local poet laureate Randall claims something of the sort.  Me, I find > lots of dietary ways to make psoriasis worse, but none to make it > better.

Darn and i wanted to be pun-ny instead. Pride of Prankenstein. > The kicker is, even those who do claim that diet helps, or clear, > psoriasis, tend to disagree on just exactly what foods hurt or help. > You can google up tons of rantings on this group about it, and other > stuff all over the web.  Macrobiotic diet might be worth a try.  Maybe > thirty days isn’t enough.  Or, maybe diet has little or nothing to > offer.

Yes, well said. It took me for ever to find the razor to even attempt to walk on it. > Here’s my advice, worth no more than you’ve paid for it:  eating a > well-balanced, healthy diet is likely to be a good thing for you, > psoriasis or not.  Avoiding high-fat, high-sugar, high-carb, > (high-alcohol) diets would be advisable.  Balance!  Avoiding > nightshade veggies (tomato, pepper, eggplant (!), potato) is another > popular one.  Eating less carbs is another theory, but that’s hard if > you go the macrobiotic direction.  Less red meat and more fish gets > you a better balance of EFAs.  Go as far down these roads as you like.

Yes, well said. Excess sugar and stress are problems for me first and dietary omega 6’s and arachidonic Acid (AA) seems to be a close second. > More important, make sure you see a real dermatologist now and again, > except … watch out for those steroid ointments they usually > recommend first, go easy on those, google up some discussions of > those.  Get some sun (unless you find it makes it worse — there’s the > variability of psoriasis again!), that often helps keep things down, > especially when you just have a few spots. > Hope some of this helps, good luck to you, if you try any of this and > you find it helps, it’d be great if you’d post it back here.

Yes, for sure. And one more site for sugar and AGE’s to chew on. First a short review: The accumulating evidence encourages us to consider glucose as not only the body’s short-term fuel but also a long-term fuel of atherogenesis. In this view, the sugar becomes harmful through its transformation into advanced glycation endproducts that not only make blood vessels inelastic and stenotic but also activate signal pathways through which long-term inflammation contributes to the pathology. For intervening, the important points are that the chemical process is lifelong and spontaneous and that it remains reversible only in its early stages, becoming progressively less so if it is allowed to proceed. Our rapidly evolving understanding leads us to the radical thought that ingestion of preformed glycation end products may be the worst trigger of vascular diseases. This in turn may imply that among the known environmental risk factors for atherogenesis, methods of food preparation must be added to food quantity and composition. As usual, what is dangerous is excess. At this time in human history, Western societies overeat. In addition, they have learned to overprocess their foods beforehand. Alteration of habits, though difficult, can have the best long-term influence as a preventive measure, while new drug interventions begin to come into sight. (For evestm to feast on with the acrylamides as this is the diet thread.) randall… less *expensive* free radicals = longer happier life – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> J.

Response:

Hi everyone. Im a 19 year old… have ‘P’ behind ears and about 4 spots on my scalp. My mom has been trying to do some research for me on diets. I don’t know what you people think about diets and its relationship to P. I know I have posted a message here before and mentioned something about my diet but a person responded saying it has nothing to do with P. Anyways… getting to the point: Has anyone tried sticking with  macrobiotic foods? My mother said she used to eat like that until she got busy, and blah blah blah. She thinks my "bad" eating habits cause my P to get worse, but I don’t. I have tried not eating junk food etc for a month with no major results before. comments/advice greatly appreciated :) josh

Response:

>Im a 19 year old… have ‘P’ behind ears and about 4 spots on my scalp. My >mom has been trying to do some research for me on diets.

Sorry to hear about anyone your age having even a few spots to worry about.   Regarding diet, the Official Medical Establishment Position is that diet has nothing to do with psoriasis. However, the Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Medical Establishment has other theories. Here’s the thing.  The Official Medical Establishment doesn’t know just what psoriasis is, except that it involves your skin producing way too many cells and not differentiating correctly, and that there’s inflammation involved from your immune system attacking something, or maybe attacking nothing.  Now, just *why* any of this gets going, is the $64,000 question.   The Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Establishment, on the other hand, will tell you exactly what is going on.  Except, they have a dozen different stories, and they can’t all be true, and, to put it mildly, none have any significant proof behind them. So, back to diet. It sure seems that many/most people with at least widespread psoriasis see some kinds of effects, mostly aggravation, from eating certain foods.  That does not mean that those foods *cause* psoriasis, but it may be reason enough to avoid them.  A *few* people manage to change their diet and find that it helps clear psoriasis significantly.  Our local poet laureate Randall claims something of the sort.  Me, I find lots of dietary ways to make psoriasis worse, but none to make it better. The kicker is, even those who do claim that diet helps, or clear, psoriasis, tend to disagree on just exactly what foods hurt or help. You can google up tons of rantings on this group about it, and other stuff all over the web.  Macrobiotic diet might be worth a try.  Maybe thirty days isn’t enough.  Or, maybe diet has little or nothing to offer. Here’s my advice, worth no more than you’ve paid for it:  eating a well-balanced, healthy diet is likely to be a good thing for you, psoriasis or not.  Avoiding high-fat, high-sugar, high-carb, (high-alcohol) diets would be advisable.  Balance!  Avoiding nightshade veggies (tomato, pepper, eggplant (!), potato) is another popular one.  Eating less carbs is another theory, but that’s hard if you go the macrobiotic direction.  Less red meat and more fish gets you a better balance of EFAs.  Go as far down these roads as you like. More important, make sure you see a real dermatologist now and again, except … watch out for those steroid ointments they usually recommend first, go easy on those, google up some discussions of those.  Get some sun (unless you find it makes it worse — there’s the variability of psoriasis again!), that often helps keep things down, especially when you just have a few spots. Hope some of this helps, good luck to you, if you try any of this and you find it helps, it’d be great if you’d post it back here. J.

Response:

I’d like to suggest two dog foods that have done remarkably well in my grooming/pet retail store.  Solid Gold Hund ‘n Flocken and California Natural. They have none of the junk ingredients that typically cause poor health and poor digestion.  Dogs with chronic skin problems: itching, flaking, red, oozing hot spots, etc. have turned completely around and grown new healthy coats after changing to Hund ‘n Flocken in approx. 6 weeks time. Its also important to supplement with vitamins, minerals, and food enzymes: such as Sea Meal by Solid Gold

Response:

>I’d like to suggest two dog foods that have done remarkably well in my >grooming/pet retail store.  Solid Gold Hund ‘n Flocken and California >Natural. >They have none of the junk ingredients that typically cause poor health >and poor digestion.  Dogs with chronic skin problems: itching, flaking, >red, oozing hot spots, etc. have turned completely around and grown new >healthy coats after changing to Hund ‘n Flocken in approx. 6 weeks time. >Its also important to supplement with vitamins, minerals, and food >enzymes: such as Sea Meal by Solid Gold

You forget to say what ingredients they have in them from most to least please? And if those dogs are so good then there should be no need for any supplements at all they should be a complete and balanced diet?

Response:

>I’d like to suggest two dog foods that have done remarkably well in my >grooming/pet retail store.  Solid Gold Hund ‘n Flocken and California >Natural. >They have none of the junk ingredients that typically cause poor health >and poor digestion.

How do you know this? Are you a nutritionist?  How many classes in canine nutrition have you had?   Have you ever heard of "ingredient splitting"? .. this is a commonly used marketing "trick" where the manufacturer splits corn into corn gluten, corn meal, or wheat into wheat bran, flour, etc.  to make Chicken or Beef or whatever appear like the largest ingredient and get listed first on the label.  It is all marketing. Anyone can make pet food, slap a label on the bag, and sell it.  No feeding trials are required.  This means some products on the shelves have never even been fed to an animal before, and the company wants you to believe it is the "best" for your pet. Look for an AAFCO statement on the pet food label.  Look for the word "feeding" somewhere in that statement.  This does not guarantee a well balanced absorbable, digestable diet, but it at least means the company has invested time, effort, and money into feeding the food to a group of animals for a short period of time, and the animals have not shown any nutritional deficits following the feeding trial.  I am amazed at how many "pet foods" on the store shelves don’t have such a statement.  Look at "treats" too.  You may be suprised.

Response:

>I’d like to suggest two dog foods that have done remarkably well in my >grooming/pet retail store.  Solid Gold Hund ‘n Flocken and California >Natural. >They have none of the junk ingredients that typically cause poor health >and poor digestion.  Dogs with chronic skin problems: itching, flaking, >red, oozing hot spots, etc. have turned completely around and grown new >healthy coats after changing to Hund ‘n Flocken in approx. 6 weeks time. >Its also important to supplement with vitamins, minerals, and food >enzymes: such as Sea Meal by Solid Gold

There is a strong movement in the pet community to become educated regarding the traditonal dog and cat foods which are of little value nutritionally and in many cases harmful as I have experienced with one of my dogs. The natural dog foods you have mentioned are an improvement and vitamin and mineral suppliment as well as the sea meal and flax oil will only increase their chances for good health. This is only the tip of the iceberg in regards to our pets health so stand strong with your beliefs. My dog would not be alive today were it not for a natural diet and suppliments prescribed by an incredible D.V.M. who practices alternative medicine (for the past 26 years! ). Gayle  

Response:

>Does anyone have the diet for cleansing the body.  I am interested in it. >If so please post. >Thanks

There are many ways to go when cleansing the body. There’s water fasting, juice fasting, raw foods, brown rice and veggies, etc. I suggest you do some research at any local store that carries books on this. Poke through them and decide which would be the best route for you. And then go for it.  Beware of what’s called the "cleansing crisis."  Often, ailments are allieviated through cleansing, but the body will get worse before getting better.  It’s no fun. Good luck. Erin

Response:

Does anyone have the diet for cleansing the body.  I am interested in it. If so please post. Thanks

Response:

> Does anyone have the diet for cleansing the body.  I am interested in it. > If so please post. > Thanks

I use a wash cloth and soap, plenty of water, and an ol’ Merle Haggart tune sung poorly and loudly in equal measures! Seriously, if you can’t get a "cleansing" diet from the American Dietetic Association, or Health Canada, that should tell you something. Kevin

Response:

What is the best diet for a normal dog with no medical problems?

Response:

Natural food diet.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> What is the best diet for a normal dog with no medical problems?

Response:

Natural food diet? Is there a website that I can go to for more info Thanks

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Natural food diet. > What is the best diet for a normal dog with no medical problems?

Response:

> Natural food diet? Is there a website that I can go to for > more info

Here’s a good starting point for information on a BARF (Bones and Raw Food) diet:   http://www.barfers.com/ — –Matt.  Rocky’s a Dog.

Response:

I used to give my cats science diet as recommended by my vet.  6 months later my oldest one, about 15 years old died from kidney failure. This was about 5 years ago.  When the senior diet came along I changed my other two cats to this.  A couple of weeks ago I lost another to kidney failure.  She was only 12.  Does anyone have any similar experiences?  It may be coincidental, but a friend also lost her cat after changing to Science diet, and I have now introduced traditional tinned food for one meal for my remaining (and lonely) cat.  My vet denies there is a link between the science diet and kidney failure.  Thanks Lindsay

Response:

I personally doubt that there is a link between feeding the Science brand and your cats’ kidney problems.  However, if you search this newsgroup, you will find there has been some discussion about dry food vs. wet.  Were you feeding only dry food?  There is a growing body of evidence that feeding dry food exclusively increases the probability of a cat developing a urinary tract infection (UTI). However, that increased probability isn’t due to a single type of dry food, although there are some that are better than others. Science is a reasonably good quality food, I believe. So, the next question is what type of kidney failure was involved. Did your cats have chronic renal failure (CRF), or did they develop the problem from a too-far-gone UTI? Left untreated, UTIs will result in a more acute onset renal failure and death. If the UTI scenario was involved, then a dry food diet may have contributed, but not necessarily a particular brand. I hope this info helps – others in this group may have better info to provide. You can learn more about kidney problems at several different web sites. Try: http://maxshouse.com, or http://www.vetinfo.com, or http://members.xoom.com/PKellyDVM/FelineHandouts.htm  All of these sites have lots of good info on a variety of things. I’m sorry to hear about the loss of your cats… Laura Got questions?  Get answers over the phone at Keen.com. Up to 100 minutes free! http://www.keen.com

Response:

Mine have been on Science Diet for ten years, and test fine. There truly is no link to kidney disease or failure and Science Diet. To lose a cat to kidney failure in that time frame, there had to be undiagnosed problems going on for some time. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I used to give my cats science diet as recommended by my vet.  6 months > later my oldest one, about 15 years old died from kidney failure. > This was about 5 years ago.  When the senior diet came along I changed my > other two cats to this.  A couple of weeks ago I lost another to kidney > failure.  She was only 12.  Does anyone have any similar experiences?  It > may be coincidental, but a friend also lost her cat after changing to > Science diet, and I have now introduced traditional tinned food for one meal > for my remaining (and lonely) cat.  My vet denies there is a link between > the science diet and kidney failure.  Thanks Lindsay

Response:

>his was about 5 years ago.  When the senior diet came along I changed my >other two cats to this.  A couple of weeks ago I lost another to kidney >failure.  She was only 12.  Does anyone have any similar experiences?  It >may be coincidental, but a friend also lost her cat after changing to >Science diet, and I have now introduced traditional tinned food for one meal >for my remaining (and lonely) cat.  My vet denies there is a link between >the science diet and kidney failure.  Thanks Lindsay

There is some suspected link between feeding a diet of dry food only, and kidney failure. You are smart to start feeding tinned food as well; this is a better choice to prevent kidney problems. I read about a group of breeders who suspected Science Diet to be responsible for early cancer deaths in many of their cats, because it contains the preservative ethoxyquin, but that’s not actually been proven. yngver (delete "nojunk" to e-mail)

Response:

Can someone suggest what to feed a 12 year old poodle with early kidney disease?.On the Vets suggeston we have allready stopped red meat and are now using special diets.Can we use white meat or fish? without any harm? Thank you. D.S.

Response:

    No you can’t. Any meat added of any kind will increase levels of phosphorous in the diet. Follow the vets advice EXACTLY. The difference is extreme. Renal failure dogs in a recent study fed Prescription Diet k/d lived an average of 594 days post diagnosis. Those fed a normal food lived an average of 188 days. The k/d dogs also had half as many uremic crises over their life spans. This is not the time to disregard the vets advice and play around. Stick to the prescribed diet strictly and without deviation.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Can someone suggest what to feed a 12 year old poodle with early kidney > disease?.On the Vets suggeston we have allready stopped red meat and are now > using special diets.Can we use white meat or fish? without any harm? > Thank you. > D.S.

Response:

> Hi All: > I’ve had a lot of luck by altering my diet over the past few months. I went > from 80% coverage to almost nothing in two months. I came up with this > regime by way of the net and trying to observe my trigger foods. I still > don’t know all my triggers so I decided to keep a daily log of my food > intake, vitamins and "other treatments". I just started but if there’s any > interest I’ll occasionally post the log for review. Let me know if this > sounds interesting to anybody.

Good for you! I get excellent results from diet, myself, and am always interested in anyone else’s observations. Keep them coming. Best wishes, Terry — To e-mail me replace "spamsucks" with "azstarnet.com"

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi All: > I’ve had a lot of luck by altering my diet over the past few months. I went > from 80% coverage to almost nothing in two months. I came up with this > regime by way of the net and trying to observe my trigger foods. I still > don’t know all my triggers so I decided to keep a daily log of my food > intake, vitamins and "other treatments". I just started but if there’s any > interest I’ll occasionally post the log for review. Let me know if this > sounds interesting to anybody. > Brian S > Brian,

Please keep us informed.  I would love to know the results.  It seems that something triggers it off. Regards Rossy Share what you know. Learn what you don’t.

Response:

> I’ve had a lot of luck by altering my diet over the past few months. I went > from 80% coverage to almost nothing in two months. I came up with this > regime by way of the net and trying to observe my trigger foods. I still > don’t know all my triggers so I decided to keep a daily log of my food > intake, vitamins and "other treatments". I just started but if there’s any > interest I’ll occasionally post the log for review. Let me know if this > sounds interesting to anybody.

The details of your diet would be very helpful and greatly appreciated. Andy Kanter http://www.clearskin.com

Response:

I can go 1 day with a diet routine and after that my desires win out… Mmmm , Those yummy Mc.Donalds french fries, and Big Mac…..(I feel like homer simpson.) ANd then those Klondike ice cream bars… THeir

Response:

Well there you have it in a nutshell.  Wheat in the buns, red meat (is it real), a dairy product with caffeine in the chocolate coating……and we musn’t forget a little grease on the fries to make it go down smooth.  Will that be coke or root beer? Seriously though…..I’m the same……every now and then I just have to dive into the junk.  Hey, you have to let go once in a while. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I can go 1 day with a diet routine and after that my desires win out… > Mmmm , Those yummy Mc.Donalds french fries, and Big Mac…..(I feel like > homer simpson.) ANd then those Klondike ice cream bars… THeir

Response:

Hi All: I’ve had a lot of luck by altering my diet over the past few months. I went from 80% coverage to almost nothing in two months. I came up with this regime by way of the net and trying to observe my trigger foods. I still don’t know all my triggers so I decided to keep a daily log of my food intake, vitamins and "other treatments". I just started but if there’s any interest I’ll occasionally post the log for review. Let me know if this sounds interesting to anybody. Brian S

Response:

Brian-      I’d love to hear what you’ve been eating.  I’ve been on the Pagano diet for about 8 weeks and can see results, but am wondering how much I can play around with it and still continue to clear. Thanks-Ellen Share what you know. Learn what you don’t.

Response:

It certainly does.  The more input we get on trigger foods the better. Thomas the German – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hi All: > I’ve had a lot of luck by altering my diet over the past few months. I went > from 80% coverage to almost nothing in two months. I came up with this > regime by way of the net and trying to observe my trigger foods. I still > don’t know all my triggers so I decided to keep a daily log of my food > intake, vitamins and "other treatments". I just started but if there’s any > interest I’ll occasionally post the log for review. Let me know if this > sounds interesting to anybody. > Brian S

Response:

Hi, Dan! >     The quote has been taken out of context. The letter of > help was to a person experiencing extreme itching problems. >     You are correct…acid neutralizing agents were recommended > for itching…not psoriasis.

I don’t know if sodium carbonate (note carbonate, not bicarbonate) would relieve itching. It is simply used to dissolve scales, nothing else. It’s an easy way of doing it. But, of course getting rid of the scaling might relieve the itching when you smoothen the skin with moisturizers afterwards… >     I see much evidence here of people trying deperately to > cope with an aggravating and sometimes debilitating problem… > psoriasis. However, the evidence does not qualify as scientific.

Right, it’s anecdotal experiences more than "evidence"… >    "Seeing is believing."…even scientific evidence can be > inaccurate.

Of course!!! :) >     I hope you are doing well and learn much from some of your > posts.

Ditto! > I plan to try the "sodium bicarbonate" the next time > I itch severely.

I wouldn’t expect too much itch relief from it, since that isn’t what it is used for… But, it works well as a scale dissolver. We call it washing soda here, and we get it in the supermarket. It has nothing to do with baking soda (sodium bicarbonate). It is a cheap remedy. Add 2-3 tablespoons into the bath tub. It also works as a water softener, so it is very comfy to bathe in. Heck, that alone is worth using it :) If you want to try something new for itching, why don’t you go to my homepage, recipe page. There you’ll find the recipe for wheat bran (note: wheat, not oat!) baths. That is certainly worth a try, and is really comfy when the itching is bad. I have enjoyed many of them, and they’re easy to prepare. If your skin is very dry, add some bath oil too. Take care!!! Hope you’re doing well!!!! — Best regards,                 Visit my homepage: Med vennlig hilsen,          <URL:http://home.newmedia.no/flaker/> _Aase Marit_ :) ))))))

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Terry, >      I have seen considerable evidence here that "acid" is a > part of the psoriasis "equation", in many cases. Much testimony > from this group hints at acidosis.(AM’s "sodium bicarbonate baths", > etc.) > Hi, Dan! > My sodium bicarbonate baths don’t help on the P. It simply dissolves the > scales!!! I have never claimed otherwise. > Also, what you see here is not evidence, it really isn’t… It’s only > people’s experience or whatever to call it. Not that experience isn’t > important, it really is, but it sure isn’t evidence!!!! :) > Hope you’re doing well! :) > — > Best regards,                 Visit my homepage: > Med vennlig hilsen,          <URL:http://home.newmedia.no/flaker/> > _Aase Marit_ :) ))))))

11-12-97 Hi AM,     The quote has been taken out of context. The letter of help was to a person experiencing extreme itching problems.     You are correct…acid neutralizing agents were recommended for itching…not psoriasis.     I see much evidence here of people trying deperately to cope with an aggravating and sometimes debilitating problem… psoriasis. However, the evidence does not qualify as scientific.    "Seeing is believing."…even scientific evidence can be inaccurate.     I hope you are doing well and learn much from some of your posts. I plan to try the "sodium bicarbonate" the next time I itch severely.                                         Dan

Response:

>     I hope you are doing well and learn much from some of your > posts. I plan to try the "sodium bicarbonate" the next time > I itch severely.

Dan, next time, take a look at what you’ve been eating and how it may have changed. Years ago, I was told by a derm at U. of Oregon that the itching is an allergic reaction. Best wishes, Terry — Legitimate e-mailers (not spammers) should remove the "spamsucks" and replace it with "azstarnet" in my address.

Response:

> Terry, >      I have seen considerable evidence here that "acid" is a > part of the psoriasis "equation", in many cases. Much testimony > from this group hints at acidosis.(AM’s "sodium bicarbonate baths", > etc.)

Hi, Dan! My sodium bicarbonate baths don’t help on the P. It simply dissolves the scales!!! I have never claimed otherwise. Also, what you see here is not evidence, it really isn’t… It’s only people’s experience or whatever to call it. Not that experience isn’t important, it really is, but it sure isn’t evidence!!!! :) Hope you’re doing well! :) — Best regards,                 Visit my homepage: Med vennlig hilsen,          <URL:http://home.newmedia.no/flaker/> _Aase Marit_ :) ))))))

Response:

>Terry Fenris has a page with a macrobiotic approach that >works well for him. I will find it if you like.

You would find it on my web site, at    http://members.aol.com/psorsite/docs/terry.html but AOL claims to be having "local server problems" at the moment, and my entire site is down.  This really bites. – Dave W. http://members.aol.com/psorsite/

Response:

Hi, Josh Diet’s the only thing that’s ever worked well for me. Here’s a summary of my experience. http://members.aol.com/psorsite/docs/terry.html Best wishes, Terry — To send friendly e-mail, replace "nospam" with "ttowne1" and "emptymind" with "mindspring.

Response:

Chicken-pox? so did I at 10 years of age. Is there a link with this disease possibly? New evidence has recently come up about chickenpox and older people. (see this BBC article on 1st May 2002). http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/newsid_1961000/1961565.stm "Vaccinating children against chickenpox – an idea gaining favour in many countries – could lead to the millions of cases of shingles in older people, say UK researchers" Maybe we get psoriasis instead? Re diet:  I found that non-dairy acidophilus from a health food shop had a great effect on my psoriasis. Maddie

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I have been to a derm, but that was a while ago. I plan on going soon since > my P is more visible now. > I was only sick once in my life: Had chicken pox when I was around a year > old and thats it (and a fever about 3 years ago for 2 days).  I have never > had antibiotics in my life, or any other sort of drug intented to aid > healing (other than aspirin/tylenol for a headache ;-P  ) > Thank you I will check that site out :D > shohei > > >Im a 19 year old… have ‘P’ behind ears and about 4 spots on my scalp. > My > > >mom has been trying to do some research for me on diets. > Hi Shohei, > First a question or two. Did you have strep and take any > antibiotics prior to P onset? Has your P been diagnosed > by a derm? If yes then a diet that aims to restore colon > function is helpful. > Here is the site where i got mine functioning better > which indirectly helps the autoimmunity factors, IMO. > www.thewholewhey.com  ( i would buy the book first > and try to understand it first before making a decision > to go this way.) > > Sorry to hear about anyone your age having even a few spots to worry > > about. > > Regarding diet, the Official Medical Establishment Position is that > > diet has nothing to do with psoriasis. > Right. As most of em don’t do much at all. > Terry Fenris has a page with a macrobiotic approach that > works well for him. I will find it if you like. > > However, the Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Medical Establishment > > has other theories. > Also true and since the alts haven’t any idea how to truly > re-establish good bacteria in the colon via an acidifying > protocol such as www.thewholewhey.com ,they are mostly > worthless. Not that some alt diets followed to ad nauseam > won’t up regulate some healthly changes over a long > period of time. (hence these folks become zealots) > Notice my zealotry for instance with whey as it works, >  and in a much shorter framework. More bang for your > buck in a shorter time frame holds the interest and > with any results keeps you on track. Yet, only the > most serious will be open to this route as few P’s > have found it. > > Here’s the thing.  The Official Medical Establishment doesn’t know > > just what psoriasis is, except that it involves your skin producing > > way too many cells and not differentiating correctly, and that there’s > > inflammation involved from your immune system attacking something, or > > maybe attacking nothing.  Now, just *why* any of this gets going, is > > the $64,000 question. > So, say the secret word and Groucho and his Duck > get the question ready. Why a duck? > > The Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Establishment, on the other > > hand, will tell you exactly what is going on.  Except, they have a > > dozen different stories, and they can’t all be true, and, to put it > > mildly, none have any significant proof behind them. > > So, back to diet. > > It sure seems that many/most people with at least widespread psoriasis > > see some kinds of effects, mostly aggravation, from eating certain > > foods.  That does not mean that those foods *cause* psoriasis, but it > > may be reason enough to avoid them.  A *few* people manage to change > > their diet and find that it helps clear psoriasis significantly.  Our > > local poet laureate Randall claims something of the sort.  Me, I find > > lots of dietary ways to make psoriasis worse, but none to make it > > better. > Darn and i wanted to be pun-ny instead. Pride of Prankenstein. > > The kicker is, even those who do claim that diet helps, or clear, > > psoriasis, tend to disagree on just exactly what foods hurt or help. > > You can google up tons of rantings on this group about it, and other > > stuff all over the web.  Macrobiotic diet might be worth a try.  Maybe > > thirty days isn’t enough.  Or, maybe diet has little or nothing to > > offer. > Yes, well said. It took me for ever to find the razor to > even attempt to walk on it. > > Here’s my advice, worth no more than you’ve paid for it:  eating a > > well-balanced, healthy diet is likely to be a good thing for you, > > psoriasis or not.  Avoiding high-fat, high-sugar, high-carb, > > (high-alcohol) diets would be advisable.  Balance!  Avoiding > > nightshade veggies (tomato, pepper, eggplant (!), potato) is another > > popular one.  Eating less carbs is another theory, but that’s hard if > > you go the macrobiotic direction.  Less red meat and more fish gets > > you a better balance of EFAs.  Go as far down these roads as you like. > Yes, well said. Excess sugar and stress are problems for me first > and dietary omega 6’s and arachidonic Acid (AA) seems to > be a close second. > > More important, make sure you see a real dermatologist now and again, > > except … watch out for those steroid ointments they usually > > recommend first, go easy on those, google up some discussions of > > those.  Get some sun (unless you find it makes it worse — there’s the > > variability of psoriasis again!), that often helps keep things down, > > especially when you just have a few spots. > > Hope some of this helps, good luck to you, if you try any of this and > > you find it helps, it’d be great if you’d post it back here. > Yes, for sure. > And one more site for sugar and AGE’s to chew on. > First a short review: > The accumulating evidence encourages us to consider glucose as not > only the body’s short-term fuel but also a long-term fuel of > atherogenesis. In this view, the sugar becomes harmful through its > transformation into advanced glycation endproducts that not only make > blood vessels inelastic and stenotic but also activate signal pathways > through which long-term inflammation contributes to the pathology. > For intervening, the important points are that the chemical process is > lifelong and spontaneous and that it remains reversible only in its > early stages, becoming progressively less so if it is allowed to > proceed. Our rapidly evolving understanding leads us to the radical > thought that ingestion of preformed glycation end products may be the > worst trigger of vascular diseases. This in turn may imply that among > the known environmental risk factors for atherogenesis, methods of > food preparation must be added to food quantity and composition. As > usual, what is dangerous is excess. At this time in human history, > Western societies overeat. In addition, they have learned to > overprocess their foods beforehand. Alteration of habits, though > difficult, can have the best long-term influence as a preventive > measure, while new drug interventions begin to come into sight. > (For evestm to feast on with the acrylamides as this is > the diet thread.) > randall… less *expensive* free radicals = longer happier life > > J.

— Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

I have been to a derm, but that was a while ago. I plan on going soon since my P is more visible now. I was only sick once in my life: Had chicken pox when I was around a year old and thats it (and a fever about 3 years ago for 2 days).  I have never had antibiotics in my life, or any other sort of drug intented to aid healing (other than aspirin/tylenol for a headache ;-P  ) Thank you I will check that site out :D shohei

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> >Im a 19 year old… have ‘P’ behind ears and about 4 spots on my scalp. My > >mom has been trying to do some research for me on diets. > Hi Shohei, > First a question or two. Did you have strep and take any > antibiotics prior to P onset? Has your P been diagnosed > by a derm? If yes then a diet that aims to restore colon > function is helpful. > Here is the site where i got mine functioning better > which indirectly helps the autoimmunity factors, IMO. > www.thewholewhey.com  ( i would buy the book first > and try to understand it first before making a decision > to go this way.) > Sorry to hear about anyone your age having even a few spots to worry > about. > Regarding diet, the Official Medical Establishment Position is that > diet has nothing to do with psoriasis. > Right. As most of em don’t do much at all. > Terry Fenris has a page with a macrobiotic approach that > works well for him. I will find it if you like. > However, the Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Medical Establishment > has other theories. > Also true and since the alts haven’t any idea how to truly > re-establish good bacteria in the colon via an acidifying > protocol such as www.thewholewhey.com ,they are mostly > worthless. Not that some alt diets followed to ad nauseam > won’t up regulate some healthly changes over a long > period of time. (hence these folks become zealots) > Notice my zealotry for instance with whey as it works, >  and in a much shorter framework. More bang for your > buck in a shorter time frame holds the interest and > with any results keeps you on track. Yet, only the > most serious will be open to this route as few P’s > have found it. > Here’s the thing.  The Official Medical Establishment doesn’t know > just what psoriasis is, except that it involves your skin producing > way too many cells and not differentiating correctly, and that there’s > inflammation involved from your immune system attacking something, or > maybe attacking nothing.  Now, just *why* any of this gets going, is > the $64,000 question. > So, say the secret word and Groucho and his Duck > get the question ready. Why a duck? > The Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Establishment, on the other > hand, will tell you exactly what is going on.  Except, they have a > dozen different stories, and they can’t all be true, and, to put it > mildly, none have any significant proof behind them. > So, back to diet. > It sure seems that many/most people with at least widespread psoriasis > see some kinds of effects, mostly aggravation, from eating certain > foods.  That does not mean that those foods *cause* psoriasis, but it > may be reason enough to avoid them.  A *few* people manage to change > their diet and find that it helps clear psoriasis significantly.  Our > local poet laureate Randall claims something of the sort.  Me, I find > lots of dietary ways to make psoriasis worse, but none to make it > better. > Darn and i wanted to be pun-ny instead. Pride of Prankenstein. > The kicker is, even those who do claim that diet helps, or clear, > psoriasis, tend to disagree on just exactly what foods hurt or help. > You can google up tons of rantings on this group about it, and other > stuff all over the web.  Macrobiotic diet might be worth a try.  Maybe > thirty days isn’t enough.  Or, maybe diet has little or nothing to > offer. > Yes, well said. It took me for ever to find the razor to > even attempt to walk on it. > Here’s my advice, worth no more than you’ve paid for it:  eating a > well-balanced, healthy diet is likely to be a good thing for you, > psoriasis or not.  Avoiding high-fat, high-sugar, high-carb, > (high-alcohol) diets would be advisable.  Balance!  Avoiding > nightshade veggies (tomato, pepper, eggplant (!), potato) is another > popular one.  Eating less carbs is another theory, but that’s hard if > you go the macrobiotic direction.  Less red meat and more fish gets > you a better balance of EFAs.  Go as far down these roads as you like. > Yes, well said. Excess sugar and stress are problems for me first > and dietary omega 6’s and arachidonic Acid (AA) seems to > be a close second. > More important, make sure you see a real dermatologist now and again, > except … watch out for those steroid ointments they usually > recommend first, go easy on those, google up some discussions of > those.  Get some sun (unless you find it makes it worse — there’s the > variability of psoriasis again!), that often helps keep things down, > especially when you just have a few spots. > Hope some of this helps, good luck to you, if you try any of this and > you find it helps, it’d be great if you’d post it back here. > Yes, for sure. > And one more site for sugar and AGE’s to chew on. > First a short review: > The accumulating evidence encourages us to consider glucose as not > only the body’s short-term fuel but also a long-term fuel of > atherogenesis. In this view, the sugar becomes harmful through its > transformation into advanced glycation endproducts that not only make > blood vessels inelastic and stenotic but also activate signal pathways > through which long-term inflammation contributes to the pathology. > For intervening, the important points are that the chemical process is > lifelong and spontaneous and that it remains reversible only in its > early stages, becoming progressively less so if it is allowed to > proceed. Our rapidly evolving understanding leads us to the radical > thought that ingestion of preformed glycation end products may be the > worst trigger of vascular diseases. This in turn may imply that among > the known environmental risk factors for atherogenesis, methods of > food preparation must be added to food quantity and composition. As > usual, what is dangerous is excess. At this time in human history, > Western societies overeat. In addition, they have learned to > overprocess their foods beforehand. Alteration of habits, though > difficult, can have the best long-term influence as a preventive > measure, while new drug interventions begin to come into sight. > (For evestm to feast on with the acrylamides as this is > the diet thread.) > randall… less *expensive* free radicals = longer happier life > J.

Response:

Hi josh(:        I am also a 19 year old…(female) I have just got rid of my 3rd outbreak of guttate psoriasis…it started out like your p …little spots on my scalp…then i was coverd in it the next couple of weeks!!!…I have been into hospital for a month…its not nice): but what can you do……I find that your diet has a lot to do with psoriasis certain foods flare it up.at the moment i am on a strict diet…which seems to help me a hell of a lot i only have about 8 p spots on my body now…….so yes i would say diet helps..cutting things out.Also stress!!!!(: that is a big cause of p…..

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi everyone. > Im a 19 year old… have ‘P’ behind ears and about 4 spots on my scalp. My > mom has been trying to do some research for me on diets. I don’t know what > you people think about diets and its relationship to P. I know I have posted > a message here before and mentioned something about my diet but a person > responded saying it has nothing to do with P. Anyways… getting to the > point: Has anyone tried sticking with  macrobiotic foods? My mother said she > used to eat like that until she got busy, and blah blah blah. She thinks my > "bad" eating habits cause my P to get worse, but I don’t. I have tried not > eating junk food etc for a month with no major results before. > comments/advice greatly appreciated :) > josh

Response:

> >Im a 19 year old… have ‘P’ behind ears and about 4 spots on my scalp. My >mom has been trying to do some research for me on diets.

Hi Shohei, First a question or two. Did you have strep and take any antibiotics prior to P onset? Has your P been diagnosed by a derm? If yes then a diet that aims to restore colon function is helpful. Here is the site where i got mine functioning better which indirectly helps the autoimmunity factors, IMO. www.thewholewhey.com  ( i would buy the book first and try to understand it first before making a decision to go this way.) > Sorry to hear about anyone your age having even a few spots to worry > about.   > Regarding diet, the Official Medical Establishment Position is that > diet has nothing to do with psoriasis.

Right. As most of em don’t do much at all. Terry Fenris has a page with a macrobiotic approach that works well for him. I will find it if you like. > However, the Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Medical Establishment > has other theories.

Also true and since the alts haven’t any idea how to truly re-establish good bacteria in the colon via an acidifying protocol such as www.thewholewhey.com ,they are mostly worthless. Not that some alt diets followed to ad nauseam won’t up regulate some healthly changes over a long period of time. (hence these folks become zealots) Notice my zealotry for instance with whey as it works,  and in a much shorter framework. More bang for your buck in a shorter time frame holds the interest and with any results keeps you on track. Yet, only the most serious will be open to this route as few P’s have found it. > Here’s the thing.  The Official Medical Establishment doesn’t know > just what psoriasis is, except that it involves your skin producing > way too many cells and not differentiating correctly, and that there’s > inflammation involved from your immune system attacking something, or > maybe attacking nothing.  Now, just *why* any of this gets going, is > the $64,000 question.

So, say the secret word and Groucho and his Duck get the question ready. Why a duck?   – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> The Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Establishment, on the other > hand, will tell you exactly what is going on.  Except, they have a > dozen different stories, and they can’t all be true, and, to put it > mildly, none have any significant proof behind them. > So, back to diet. > It sure seems that many/most people with at least widespread psoriasis > see some kinds of effects, mostly aggravation, from eating certain > foods.  That does not mean that those foods *cause* psoriasis, but it > may be reason enough to avoid them.  A *few* people manage to change > their diet and find that it helps clear psoriasis significantly.  Our > local poet laureate Randall claims something of the sort.  Me, I find > lots of dietary ways to make psoriasis worse, but none to make it > better.

Darn and i wanted to be pun-ny instead. Pride of Prankenstein. > The kicker is, even those who do claim that diet helps, or clear, > psoriasis, tend to disagree on just exactly what foods hurt or help. > You can google up tons of rantings on this group about it, and other > stuff all over the web.  Macrobiotic diet might be worth a try.  Maybe > thirty days isn’t enough.  Or, maybe diet has little or nothing to > offer.

Yes, well said. It took me for ever to find the razor to even attempt to walk on it. > Here’s my advice, worth no more than you’ve paid for it:  eating a > well-balanced, healthy diet is likely to be a good thing for you, > psoriasis or not.  Avoiding high-fat, high-sugar, high-carb, > (high-alcohol) diets would be advisable.  Balance!  Avoiding > nightshade veggies (tomato, pepper, eggplant (!), potato) is another > popular one.  Eating less carbs is another theory, but that’s hard if > you go the macrobiotic direction.  Less red meat and more fish gets > you a better balance of EFAs.  Go as far down these roads as you like.

Yes, well said. Excess sugar and stress are problems for me first and dietary omega 6’s and arachidonic Acid (AA) seems to be a close second. > More important, make sure you see a real dermatologist now and again, > except … watch out for those steroid ointments they usually > recommend first, go easy on those, google up some discussions of > those.  Get some sun (unless you find it makes it worse — there’s the > variability of psoriasis again!), that often helps keep things down, > especially when you just have a few spots. > Hope some of this helps, good luck to you, if you try any of this and > you find it helps, it’d be great if you’d post it back here.

Yes, for sure. And one more site for sugar and AGE’s to chew on. First a short review: The accumulating evidence encourages us to consider glucose as not only the body’s short-term fuel but also a long-term fuel of atherogenesis. In this view, the sugar becomes harmful through its transformation into advanced glycation endproducts that not only make blood vessels inelastic and stenotic but also activate signal pathways through which long-term inflammation contributes to the pathology. For intervening, the important points are that the chemical process is lifelong and spontaneous and that it remains reversible only in its early stages, becoming progressively less so if it is allowed to proceed. Our rapidly evolving understanding leads us to the radical thought that ingestion of preformed glycation end products may be the worst trigger of vascular diseases. This in turn may imply that among the known environmental risk factors for atherogenesis, methods of food preparation must be added to food quantity and composition. As usual, what is dangerous is excess. At this time in human history, Western societies overeat. In addition, they have learned to overprocess their foods beforehand. Alteration of habits, though difficult, can have the best long-term influence as a preventive measure, while new drug interventions begin to come into sight. (For evestm to feast on with the acrylamides as this is the diet thread.) randall… less *expensive* free radicals = longer happier life – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> J.

Response:

Hi everyone. Im a 19 year old… have ‘P’ behind ears and about 4 spots on my scalp. My mom has been trying to do some research for me on diets. I don’t know what you people think about diets and its relationship to P. I know I have posted a message here before and mentioned something about my diet but a person responded saying it has nothing to do with P. Anyways… getting to the point: Has anyone tried sticking with  macrobiotic foods? My mother said she used to eat like that until she got busy, and blah blah blah. She thinks my "bad" eating habits cause my P to get worse, but I don’t. I have tried not eating junk food etc for a month with no major results before. comments/advice greatly appreciated :) josh

Response:

>Im a 19 year old… have ‘P’ behind ears and about 4 spots on my scalp. My >mom has been trying to do some research for me on diets.

Sorry to hear about anyone your age having even a few spots to worry about.   Regarding diet, the Official Medical Establishment Position is that diet has nothing to do with psoriasis. However, the Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Medical Establishment has other theories. Here’s the thing.  The Official Medical Establishment doesn’t know just what psoriasis is, except that it involves your skin producing way too many cells and not differentiating correctly, and that there’s inflammation involved from your immune system attacking something, or maybe attacking nothing.  Now, just *why* any of this gets going, is the $64,000 question.   The Unofficial Alternative and Fringe Establishment, on the other hand, will tell you exactly what is going on.  Except, they have a dozen different stories, and they can’t all be true, and, to put it mildly, none have any significant proof behind them. So, back to diet. It sure seems that many/most people with at least widespread psoriasis see some kinds of effects, mostly aggravation, from eating certain foods.  That does not mean that those foods *cause* psoriasis, but it may be reason enough to avoid them.  A *few* people manage to change their diet and find that it helps clear psoriasis significantly.  Our local poet laureate Randall claims something of the sort.  Me, I find lots of dietary ways to make psoriasis worse, but none to make it better. The kicker is, even those who do claim that diet helps, or clear, psoriasis, tend to disagree on just exactly what foods hurt or help. You can google up tons of rantings on this group about it, and other stuff all over the web.  Macrobiotic diet might be worth a try.  Maybe thirty days isn’t enough.  Or, maybe diet has little or nothing to offer. Here’s my advice, worth no more than you’ve paid for it:  eating a well-balanced, healthy diet is likely to be a good thing for you, psoriasis or not.  Avoiding high-fat, high-sugar, high-carb, (high-alcohol) diets would be advisable.  Balance!  Avoiding nightshade veggies (tomato, pepper, eggplant (!), potato) is another popular one.  Eating less carbs is another theory, but that’s hard if you go the macrobiotic direction.  Less red meat and more fish gets you a better balance of EFAs.  Go as far down these roads as you like. More important, make sure you see a real dermatologist now and again, except … watch out for those steroid ointments they usually recommend first, go easy on those, google up some discussions of those.  Get some sun (unless you find it makes it worse — there’s the variability of psoriasis again!), that often helps keep things down, especially when you just have a few spots. Hope some of this helps, good luck to you, if you try any of this and you find it helps, it’d be great if you’d post it back here. J.

Response:

I’d like to suggest two dog foods that have done remarkably well in my grooming/pet retail store.  Solid Gold Hund ‘n Flocken and California Natural. They have none of the junk ingredients that typically cause poor health and poor digestion.  Dogs with chronic skin problems: itching, flaking, red, oozing hot spots, etc. have turned completely around and grown new healthy coats after changing to Hund ‘n Flocken in approx. 6 weeks time. Its also important to supplement with vitamins, minerals, and food enzymes: such as Sea Meal by Solid Gold

Response:

>I’d like to suggest two dog foods that have done remarkably well in my >grooming/pet retail store.  Solid Gold Hund ‘n Flocken and California >Natural. >They have none of the junk ingredients that typically cause poor health >and poor digestion.  Dogs with chronic skin problems: itching, flaking, >red, oozing hot spots, etc. have turned completely around and grown new >healthy coats after changing to Hund ‘n Flocken in approx. 6 weeks time. >Its also important to supplement with vitamins, minerals, and food >enzymes: such as Sea Meal by Solid Gold

You forget to say what ingredients they have in them from most to least please? And if those dogs are so good then there should be no need for any supplements at all they should be a complete and balanced diet?

Response:

>I’d like to suggest two dog foods that have done remarkably well in my >grooming/pet retail store.  Solid Gold Hund ‘n Flocken and California >Natural. >They have none of the junk ingredients that typically cause poor health >and poor digestion.

How do you know this? Are you a nutritionist?  How many classes in canine nutrition have you had?   Have you ever heard of "ingredient splitting"? .. this is a commonly used marketing "trick" where the manufacturer splits corn into corn gluten, corn meal, or wheat into wheat bran, flour, etc.  to make Chicken or Beef or whatever appear like the largest ingredient and get listed first on the label.  It is all marketing. Anyone can make pet food, slap a label on the bag, and sell it.  No feeding trials are required.  This means some products on the shelves have never even been fed to an animal before, and the company wants you to believe it is the "best" for your pet. Look for an AAFCO statement on the pet food label.  Look for the word "feeding" somewhere in that statement.  This does not guarantee a well balanced absorbable, digestable diet, but it at least means the company has invested time, effort, and money into feeding the food to a group of animals for a short period of time, and the animals have not shown any nutritional deficits following the feeding trial.  I am amazed at how many "pet foods" on the store shelves don’t have such a statement.  Look at "treats" too.  You may be suprised.

Response:

>I’d like to suggest two dog foods that have done remarkably well in my >grooming/pet retail store.  Solid Gold Hund ‘n Flocken and California >Natural. >They have none of the junk ingredients that typically cause poor health >and poor digestion.  Dogs with chronic skin problems: itching, flaking, >red, oozing hot spots, etc. have turned completely around and grown new >healthy coats after changing to Hund ‘n Flocken in approx. 6 weeks time. >Its also important to supplement with vitamins, minerals, and food >enzymes: such as Sea Meal by Solid Gold

There is a strong movement in the pet community to become educated regarding the traditonal dog and cat foods which are of little value nutritionally and in many cases harmful as I have experienced with one of my dogs. The natural dog foods you have mentioned are an improvement and vitamin and mineral suppliment as well as the sea meal and flax oil will only increase their chances for good health. This is only the tip of the iceberg in regards to our pets health so stand strong with your beliefs. My dog would not be alive today were it not for a natural diet and suppliments prescribed by an incredible D.V.M. who practices alternative medicine (for the past 26 years! ). Gayle  

Response:

>Does anyone have the diet for cleansing the body.  I am interested in it. >If so please post. >Thanks

There are many ways to go when cleansing the body. There’s water fasting, juice fasting, raw foods, brown rice and veggies, etc. I suggest you do some research at any local store that carries books on this. Poke through them and decide which would be the best route for you. And then go for it.  Beware of what’s called the "cleansing crisis."  Often, ailments are allieviated through cleansing, but the body will get worse before getting better.  It’s no fun. Good luck. Erin

Response:

Does anyone have the diet for cleansing the body.  I am interested in it. If so please post. Thanks

Response:

> Does anyone have the diet for cleansing the body.  I am interested in it. > If so please post. > Thanks

I use a wash cloth and soap, plenty of water, and an ol’ Merle Haggart tune sung poorly and loudly in equal measures! Seriously, if you can’t get a "cleansing" diet from the American Dietetic Association, or Health Canada, that should tell you something. Kevin

Response:

–WebTV-Mail-597897945-3570 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I suffered like the rest of you, But not any more. Iv found what works fo me, And now my face is baby soft. It was easy I stared cleaning my self out from the in side, I stared a diet of natural juices & foods, Now  Im acne free for over 5 years plus i well give you info for free :) –WebTV-Mail-597897945-3570 Content-Description: signature Content-Type: TEXT/HTML; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT <html> <font color=black><font effect=shadow><H1><b><marquee>From the healthiest man alive, I welcome you to my world, as strange as it may seem, click on the Alien to visit my world…..-Juiceman</marquee> <center> <a href="http://members.tripod.com/~ethanesq/index.html"transition="zoominout"> <img SRC="http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/7406/alien.gif"> <bgsound SRC="http://www.stoutman.com/wavs/oneliners/halsorry.wav" autostart=true> </html></a></font></body> –WebTV-Mail-597897945-3570–

Response:

I’m only 135 lbs, but I can out eat my 250lbs friends.  Sometimes we’ll go to  pizza and I’ll have a whole large, or I’ll go to Burger King and eat 5  whoppers…Is this leading to me to have worse acne than the already horrible  acne I have? Does a low fat diet help, or a diary free diet help?  Or is diet just a  lie…and it doesn’t matter what you eat? Also, are processed foods with stuff like whey, and all those chemicals bad for  the skin?  Do they block the pores causing more breakouts? Thanks : )

Response:

My doctors assure me that diet has NOTHING!! to do with the cause of acne. However, they say that certain foods can cause acne.?? BUT different foods affect different people. For me, when eating a lemon or a curry, it makes my face sweat and more oil is also produced. The pores that are already blocked become moreso with the new addition. Who knows? Acne is a very difficult subject to talk about. It just affects different people in different ways so it hard to give the right drug to the right patient. I am assured by my doc though that fresh air and even sunlight can help clear up spots. Basically it does the same as accutane, (very slightly)- makes your skin dry up. I have another question to ask you all though. What does accutane do exactly? Does it just lower the amount of oil produces by the glands?

Response:

>My doctors assure me that diet has NOTHING!! to do with the cause of acne.

The cause of acne is not known.  Genetics and hormones are factors. >However, they say that certain foods can cause acne.??

Certain foods can aggravate acne in sensitive individuals.  Typically these include iodine, sugar, caffeine, peanut butter, and others. >BUT different foods affect different people. For me, when eating a lemon or >a curry, it makes my face sweat and more oil is also produced. The pores >that are already blocked become moreso with the new addition.

Everyone is different.  If your body reacts negatively to certain foods, then by all means avoid them. >I have another question to ask you all though. >What does accutane do exactly? Does it just lower the amount of oil produces >by the glands?

This is interesting.  My understanding is accutane affects the sebaceous glands, somehow shrinking their size so that less oil is produced.  I have heard though from my derm that it is not known exactly how accutane achieves this result, ie. the mechanism by which accutane accomplishes this is not understood.   Dee

Response:

Definetly nothing with sugar in….but thats about as much as I know. Jack

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> what are the things I shouldn’t be eating? > Jim > — > i’m not living, > i’m just killing time

Response:

>I seem to have a bad reaction when i drink more than a cup of milk a >day or even coffee.  I don’t think anything with sugar in it is bad, >maybe the processed stuff like pop.. some fruits have tons of sugar >like canteloupe and no one i know has had bad reactions to it.

Natural sugars from fruit (fructose) are metabolized more slowly by the body than refined white sugar (sucrose).  Fruit also has fiber which buffers the digestion of the fructose, so that fructose does not cause an insulin spike, unlike white sugar.  White sugars (including sucrose, corn syrup, sorbitol, maltitol, etc) are the ones that are most likely to exacerbate acne in people who have dietary triggers. Dee

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > i saw this list on foods to eat / not to eat for acne prevention > on a link from www.about.com  However i haven’t been able to > find the actual link, but i’ve copied it down. > i would also add iodine to the list of foods to avoid.  for many > people it inflames their acne. > try to get a lot of carrots and green bell peppers into your > diet. > FOODS TO EAT > Green Vegetables > Carrots > Celery > Onions > Garlic > Cucumber > Watercress > Kelp > Seaweeds

Kelp and seawwd are notoriously high in Iodine, I would say avoid them at all cost. that means no more sushi :( Lady ——

Response:

If you’re worried about your diet’s effect on acne you can just go the hardcore route.  Go on a water fast.  Of course do some research before you do it.  But fasting has been used many times in the past to clear up acne.  I went on a 1 day water fast two weeks ago.  Went on a three day juice fast this past weekend. And I’ve cleared up 50%.  Also my skin just feels so much better and so does my health.  I feel that my skin is a lot less oily and i feel that my body can fight the acne infection quickly if the pores were infected by acne.  When you get off the fast slowly add foods in and see if your skin has any reaction to it. I went off the erythomycin that my doctor prescribed.  I started juicing organic carrots, green bell peppers, parsley, and potatoes.  That gives me the beta carotene, zinc, and other vitamins I need to make my immune system strong.  I also use benzamycin every night. Good luck. * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet’s Discussion Network * The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet – Free!

Response:

Avoid all dairy based foods including cheese and yogurt. Remember: milk is for babies. Mark – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > what are the things I shouldn’t be eating? > Jim > — > i’m not living, > i’m just killing time

Response:

–WebTV-Mail-597897945-3570 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I suffered like the rest of you, But not any more. Iv found what works fo me, And now my face is baby soft. It was easy I stared cleaning my self out from the in side, I stared a diet of natural juices & foods, Now  Im acne free for over 5 years plus i well give you info for free :) –WebTV-Mail-597897945-3570 Content-Description: signature Content-Type: TEXT/HTML; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT <html> <font color=black><font effect=shadow><H1><b><marquee>From the healthiest man alive, I welcome you to my world, as strange as it may seem, click on the Alien to visit my world…..-Juiceman</marquee> <center> <a href="http://members.tripod.com/~ethanesq/index.html"transition="zoominout"> <img SRC="http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/7406/alien.gif"> <bgsound SRC="http://www.stoutman.com/wavs/oneliners/halsorry.wav" autostart=true> </html></a></font></body> –WebTV-Mail-597897945-3570–

Response:

I’m only 135 lbs, but I can out eat my 250lbs friends.  Sometimes we’ll go to  pizza and I’ll have a whole large, or I’ll go to Burger King and eat 5  whoppers…Is this leading to me to have worse acne than the already horrible  acne I have? Does a low fat diet help, or a diary free diet help?  Or is diet just a  lie…and it doesn’t matter what you eat? Also, are processed foods with stuff like whey, and all those chemicals bad for  the skin?  Do they block the pores causing more breakouts? Thanks : )

Response:

My doctors assure me that diet has NOTHING!! to do with the cause of acne. However, they say that certain foods can cause acne.?? BUT different foods affect different people. For me, when eating a lemon or a curry, it makes my face sweat and more oil is also produced. The pores that are already blocked become moreso with the new addition. Who knows? Acne is a very difficult subject to talk about. It just affects different people in different ways so it hard to give the right drug to the right patient. I am assured by my doc though that fresh air and even sunlight can help clear up spots. Basically it does the same as accutane, (very slightly)- makes your skin dry up. I have another question to ask you all though. What does accutane do exactly? Does it just lower the amount of oil produces by the glands?

Response:

>My doctors assure me that diet has NOTHING!! to do with the cause of acne.

The cause of acne is not known.  Genetics and hormones are factors. >However, they say that certain foods can cause acne.??

Certain foods can aggravate acne in sensitive individuals.  Typically these include iodine, sugar, caffeine, peanut butter, and others. >BUT different foods affect different people. For me, when eating a lemon or >a curry, it makes my face sweat and more oil is also produced. The pores >that are already blocked become moreso with the new addition.

Everyone is different.  If your body reacts negatively to certain foods, then by all means avoid them. >I have another question to ask you all though. >What does accutane do exactly? Does it just lower the amount of oil produces >by the glands?

This is interesting.  My understanding is accutane affects the sebaceous glands, somehow shrinking their size so that less oil is produced.  I have heard though from my derm that it is not known exactly how accutane achieves this result, ie. the mechanism by which accutane accomplishes this is not understood.   Dee

Response:

Definetly nothing with sugar in….but thats about as much as I know. Jack

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> what are the things I shouldn’t be eating? > Jim > — > i’m not living, > i’m just killing time

Response:

>I seem to have a bad reaction when i drink more than a cup of milk a >day or even coffee.  I don’t think anything with sugar in it is bad, >maybe the processed stuff like pop.. some fruits have tons of sugar >like canteloupe and no one i know has had bad reactions to it.

Natural sugars from fruit (fructose) are metabolized more slowly by the body than refined white sugar (sucrose).  Fruit also has fiber which buffers the digestion of the fructose, so that fructose does not cause an insulin spike, unlike white sugar.  White sugars (including sucrose, corn syrup, sorbitol, maltitol, etc) are the ones that are most likely to exacerbate acne in people who have dietary triggers. Dee

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > i saw this list on foods to eat / not to eat for acne prevention > on a link from www.about.com  However i haven’t been able to > find the actual link, but i’ve copied it down. > i would also add iodine to the list of foods to avoid.  for many > people it inflames their acne. > try to get a lot of carrots and green bell peppers into your > diet. > FOODS TO EAT > Green Vegetables > Carrots > Celery > Onions > Garlic > Cucumber > Watercress > Kelp > Seaweeds

Kelp and seawwd are notoriously high in Iodine, I would say avoid them at all cost. that means no more sushi :( Lady ——

Response:

If you’re worried about your diet’s effect on acne you can just go the hardcore route.  Go on a water fast.  Of course do some research before you do it.  But fasting has been used many times in the past to clear up acne.  I went on a 1 day water fast two weeks ago.  Went on a three day juice fast this past weekend. And I’ve cleared up 50%.  Also my skin just feels so much better and so does my health.  I feel that my skin is a lot less oily and i feel that my body can fight the acne infection quickly if the pores were infected by acne.  When you get off the fast slowly add foods in and see if your skin has any reaction to it. I went off the erythomycin that my doctor prescribed.  I started juicing organic carrots, green bell peppers, parsley, and potatoes.  That gives me the beta carotene, zinc, and other vitamins I need to make my immune system strong.  I also use benzamycin every night. Good luck. * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet’s Discussion Network * The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet – Free!

Response:

Avoid all dairy based foods including cheese and yogurt. Remember: milk is for babies. Mark – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > what are the things I shouldn’t be eating? > Jim > — > i’m not living, > i’m just killing time

Response:

Categories: Exercise Asthma

Question:

This post not CC’d by email >I don’t currently take any BP readings unless for some reason I think it >might be out of whack.  I’ve had slightly high BP since my mid 20’s.  It >seems to be very well controlled with medication and my current Dr. sees no >reason for me to monitor it at home on a regular basis.  This was not always >so.  When I was going to the military facility in Cape Cod, the Dr. I saw >wanted me to keep a log of my BP readings.  He suggested twice daily random >readings, but I often did more readings just for the heck of it.  Had a lot >of time on my hands and there’s not much to do in Cape Cod, especially in >the winter!  *L*

G’day G’day Julie,   The seasons of our lives, eh? >What I learned is that I could take reading after reading repeatedly, and >get entirely different numbers.  I also learned that I almost always got >lower readings at home.  Usually low enough to be well below normal.  But I >also studied up on taking the readings and when I did them at home, I did >everything the way it is supposed to be done.  For one thing, I made sure to >get a cuff that was large enough to fit well around my upper arm.  If the >cuff is too small (or too large) you’ll get a false reading.  I can’t tell >you how many times I’ve been to a new Dr. and they’ve used the standard cuff >on me.  They will then get a funny look on their face, then go get the >larger cuff.  They always get a better reading then.  My arms are not fat, >but they are very muscular and for that reason, I need the larger cuff. >Other things that can affect your reading are talking, eating, drinking, and >activity.  It’s best not to have anything to eat or drink immediately before >taking a reading and to sit still for 5 minutes before taking a reading.

The pamphlet suggests it is a bad idea to take a reading when one needs to go for a pee.  Very understandable. >Take good deep breaths while doing the reading.  I’ve found that shallow >breaths or holding your breath can give you a higher reading.  This is one >reason why my readings are always higher at the Drs. office.  I hate having >that cuff squeezing my arm.  I’m fine to do it to myself, but I dislike >having anyone else do it to me.  I get sort of panicky.  I think this is >because I once had a nurse pump the cuff up on my arm, then leave the room >to talk on the phone to her boyfriend.  She left me like that for about 5 >minutes.  I was much younger then and didn’t know what to do.  I thought if >I took the cuff off I might break it or something, so I sat there suffering >and seething.  Needless to say, my reading was quite high then!

It sure makes a difference getting the right nurse or getting one on a good day. >And at one point, my eye Dr. feared I had glaucoma.  They had gotten a new >machine at their office that puffs air into the center of your eye to check >the pressure.  The person doing it wasn’t doing it right.  If done right, it >doesn’t hurt.  But she kept missing the center of my eye and that not only >hurt, but dried my eyes out.  I was so tense from that they couldn’t get a >decent reading.  The Dr. then did an experiment.  He tested my BP using an >arm cuff.  It was normal.  He then seated me at the machine and tested it >again.  It went WAY high!  He also did the old fashioned glaucoma test where >the eye is numbed with cocaine and a needle is inserted to check the >pressure.  No glaucoma.

Good thing the doctor had the smarts to figure out what might have been happening, the embedded strategy to test out his hypothesis and achieve the desired result by an alternative route. >Also, when I was going to the Dr. in Cape Cod, they guy who often did the BP >tests was really chatty.  He was a really nice guy and had just come from >the area where I grew up.  So he would strike up a conversation with me >about the Seattle area.  This was nice, but I would get excited in talking >to him, and my BP would go up.  I kept telling him that it’s best not to >talk during a reading and that I feared that our conversations were giving >me higher readings.  So he agreed that the next time I came in, he would let >someone else do my BP.  Sure enough, I got a decent reading.

Conversation with the dogs is a bit limited.  <grin> >So while I know all these things, it does pose some questions in my mind. >Most of us do not spend our days sitting around breathing deeply and doing >nothing.  We have conversations.  We get excited.  We get tense and stressed >out.  We eat, exercise, etc.  In fact, we probably spend most of our day >doing those things instead of sitting around attempting to relax.  So it >almost seems better to me to go for a random reading without all the prep >stuff.

My thoughts go along similar lines.  The situation seems roughly analogous to fasting blood glucose and post prandial testing.  At one time doctors were only interested in fasting blood glucose.  Then someone pursued the idea that peak values after meals (1 hour) and recovery after meals (2 hour) might be important.  Of course a lot of literature was generated along the way.   Another analogous situation might be homocysteine testing.   There are two forms fasting and methionine challenge testing. The challenge testing is twice as like to predict future problems. >Another thing I’ve been told is that some people have a problem with BP that >relates to sitting, standing or lying down.  Their BP might be fine for most >of the day, but might go too high or too low when changing positions.  For >that reason, it’s a good idea to take occasional tests in different >positions and immediately after changing positions. >– >Type 2 >http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Thanks Julie,    For interest sake I may look at post exercise states to see if biofeedback is applicable. — Quentin Grady       ^  ^  / New Zealand,       >#,#< [                     / /     "… and the blind dog was leading." http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Response:

This post not CC’d by email >I’m not going to read all the responses but maybe others have said >what I’ll say. >I would think the best way would be to take 3 measurements and use the >median value.  (not the average)  That helps with blips in >experimental error

Thanks Marco.    The median is certainly simple to discover. — Quentin Grady       ^  ^  / New Zealand,       >#,#< [                     / /     "… and the blind dog was leading." http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Response:

This post not CC’d by email >Hi Quentin, >Considerable swings in BP during the day and night are normal. A pain >attack, fear, scare, intercourse can spike BP to over 160 mmHG. When relaxed >and sleeping it can go down to 60. Diastolic can go to 30 during sleep. >I measure BP first thing every morning, together with BG and weight and keep >records, of course. Every month I average the BP( 120/65). >I measure once, sitting down, left arm supported at heart level, both feet >flat on the ground and as relaxed as possible. >That’s what the doc told me to do.

G’day G’day Fred,   That sounds reasonable. >When I go for a check up, at the sight of a white coat, systolic BP goes to >140-150, but diastolic remains around 60-70.

I am going to run courses on curing white coat phobia one day.   Looks like a money spinner.   <grin. >In May and June I had a very stressful time. Then my BP was 140-150-160 in >the morning. >Contrary to what I’ve read, I can tell most of the time when my BP is >elevated. By concentrating and relaxing I can lower my BP. It takes about >two minutes. I could not do it when I was stressed out in May and June. >When I’m at the doctors they measure so quickly that I don’t have chance to >get in a comfortable position and relax. Consequently, the nurse tells me I >have elevated BP. To the doctor I show my tables and all gets settled.

Way to go.  For me the most important thing may be to have a routine for inducing the relaxation response throughout the day.  The body isn’t going to be affected by what happens with testing at the doctors, the time period is too short to be significant.   >Good luck >Fred Henzi

– Quentin Grady       ^  ^  / New Zealand,       >#,#< [                     / /     "… and the blind dog was leading." http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Response:

This post not CC’d by email >I take my blood pressure at the free machines sited in many U.S. >department stores.  I stop for a bit while shopping and test. > AFAIK,  the criteria for a meaningful b.p. test is a "relaxed", >"resting" test with the sensor at heart level.   I think I once read >that the patient should sit quietly for 10 minutes before taking the >test. > I find that running around the store does not relax or rest me.   My >first reading will be high, usually 140-145, then successive readings >will decay to some constant value.   (My low-dose ARB seems to be >holding me between 110 and 120.)

LOL G’day G’day Al,  You can take the engineer out of the engineering but you can’t the engineering out of the engineer.  I had this mental picture of you drawing a decay curve and calculating the various decay constants. >Thus, I sit at the machine repeating the test until it seems to have   >decayed to some stable value.  Sometimes that calls for 3 tests, >sometimes 5 or more. > I also find that low blood sugar elevates b.p.  

Now that is interesting. Sort of makes sense.  Not enough blood glucose getting to the brain … rev up the blood pressure.   >I try to schedule a >b.p. test for normal to high bG.   This relationship is sometimes >humorous in that an anomalous b.p. is sometimes my first warning of a >dropping bG.

Ah so there IS feedback.  <grin>   > I have heard that the lie-down then sit-up/stand-up b.p. ratio is an >indicator of vascular/arterial health.  Unfortunately,  I don’t trust >the sites I have found so far and I haven’t looked too hard for a >reputable site.  If I ever break down and buy a home testing machine, >I probably will get serious about such tests.

Hope you never break down or up for that matter.   >Regards >  Old Al (Insulin injector who often experiences bG lower than >comfortable)

Best wishes and thanks.  I always look forward to your replies. — Quentin Grady       ^  ^  / New Zealand,       >#,#< [                     / /     "… and the blind dog was leading." http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Response:

: Hi : I am a participant in the Anglo Scandinavian Coronary Outcomes Trial : (ASCOT).  When I go to the centre for my 6 monthly checks they take my BP 3 : times and average the results. : Douglas Three times, one right after the other or at three different times during the examination?  I ask, because I have been told not to test twice on the same arm right after each other as I will give a lower reading on the second est because of something that hapens to the arteries.  Sorry, I don’t remember what the something is Wendy  

Response:

Hi I am a participant in the Anglo Scandinavian Coronary Outcomes Trial (ASCOT).  When I go to the centre for my 6 monthly checks they take my BP 3 times and average the results. Douglas

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> G’day G’day Folks, >   Some days it is like being born again.  One discovers little > challenges like gravity … unless one laughs at oneself and figures > one already knows the answer in another context or other people have > solved the problem before one even knew the current one existed. > OK, so looking at a similar context in which there is already a > solution. > When measuring peak flow rates for asthma one measures the best of > three ie the highest reading.  That seems reasonable. It measures what > one’s lungs CAN do. The assumption is the other lower readings arose > from something like mistiming the puff. > Is the blood pressure situation truly analogous? > Are we looking for the best reading in the blood pressure case? > OK, so eliciting what others already know about the situation. > For those of you who regularly take blood pressure readings, > 1.  How many readings do you take at one session? > 2.  Which one, if any, do you record? > 3.  What’s the rationale behind your strategy? > Thanks, > — > Quentin Grady       ^  ^  / > New Zealand,       >#,#< [ >                     / / > "… and the blind dog was leading." > http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Response:

I’m not going to read all the responses but maybe others have said what I’ll say. I would think the best way would be to take 3 measurements and use the median value.  (not the average)  That helps with blips in experimental error – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >G’day G’day Folks, >  Some days it is like being born again.  One discovers little >challenges like gravity … unless one laughs at oneself and figures >one already knows the answer in another context or other people have >solved the problem before one even knew the current one existed.   >OK, so looking at a similar context in which there is already a >solution. >When measuring peak flow rates for asthma one measures the best of >three ie the highest reading.  That seems reasonable. It measures what >one’s lungs CAN do. The assumption is the other lower readings arose >from something like mistiming the puff.   >Is the blood pressure situation truly analogous? >Are we looking for the best reading in the blood pressure case? >OK, so eliciting what others already know about the situation. >For those of you who regularly take blood pressure readings, >1.  How many readings do you take at one session? >2.  Which one, if any, do you record? >3.  What’s the rationale behind your strategy?   >Thanks,

Response:

Hello Quentin, I test to make sure that it is staying where it should be under certain conditions.  Like I mentioned, I don’t do this all of the time.  I just want to make sure it is not going really high if I am under more stress than normal.  I usually just go by what the doctors readings are.  I see him every 6 months.  If my bp is within normal range when I go in for my appts., then I am fairly certain that I am ok as that is a stressful situation. The 120/70 is with meds.  I have been taking a bp med for quite a few years now. Blood pressure varies so much, that I am not concerned with it unless it goes up under stressful situations and stays up.   Best, Dot Type 2  Diag 8/2001 – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -><When I check at home, I usually only check it in the mornings and the >evenings (once each time).  I do not check it all of the time, but at >least once or twice a month I have a period of time where I keep tabs on it to make sure the bp med is still working (maybe 5 days in a row).  I do record the readings and other specifics (under stress, sick, etc.). >I am probably not what you would consider a "regular" checker as I do >not check it everyday.> >G’day G’day Dot, > I reckon that is about the best strategy one can have.  You do it >when you use the results to learn something from.  Raw data by itself >is pretty pointless.  Its changing behaviour in the right direction >that matter. ><My bp ususally runs around 120/70.> >Which leads me to wonder why you test.  Is the 120/70 with meds? >Best wishes, >Best, >Dot >Type 2  Diag 8/2001

Response:

This post not CC’d by email >He came in about 10 mins later,  and tested me in sitting >position. >5. Told to lie down, tested again. >6. Told to stand on the floor, tested again.

G’day G’day Annette,  Thanks for all the information.   There has been research done that advocated comparing lying down and standing up value.  The conclusion the researchers reached was that they could detect FUTURE high blood pressure risk.  They were able to recognise people who would soon show up with high blood pressure with a reasonable degree of accuracy.  Where I’d find the paper now I don’t know. Best wishes, — Quentin Grady       ^  ^  / New Zealand,       >#,#< [                     / /     "… and the blind dog was leading." http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Response:

Hi Quentin, Considerable swings in BP during the day and night are normal. A pain attack, fear, scare, intercourse can spike BP to over 160 mmHG. When relaxed and sleeping it can go down to 60. Diastolic can go to 30 during sleep. I measure BP first thing every morning, together with BG and weight and keep records, of course. Every month I average the BP( 120/65). I measure once, sitting down, left arm supported at heart level, both feet flat on the ground and as relaxed as possible. That’s what the doc told me to do. When I go for a check up, at the sight of a white coat, systolic BP goes to 140-150, but diastolic remains around 60-70. In May and June I had a very stressful time. Then my BP was 140-150-160 in the morning. Contrary to what I’ve read, I can tell most of the time when my BP is elevated. By concentrating and relaxing I can lower my BP. It takes about two minutes. I could not do it when I was stressed out in May and June. When I’m at the doctors they measure so quickly that I don’t have chance to get in a comfortable position and relax. Consequently, the nurse tells me I have elevated BP. To the doctor I show my tables and all gets settled. Good luck Fred Henzi . – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Is the blood pressure situation truly analogous? > Are we looking for the best reading in the blood pressure case? > OK, so eliciting what others already know about the situation. > For those of you who regularly take blood pressure readings, > 1.  How many readings do you take at one session? > 2.  Which one, if any, do you record? > 3.  What’s the rationale behind your strategy? > Thanks, > — > Quentin Grady       ^  ^  / > New Zealand,       >#,#< [ >                     / / > "… and the blind dog was leading." > http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > G’day G’day Folks, >   Some days it is like being born again.  One discovers little > challenges like gravity … unless one laughs at oneself and figures > one already knows the answer in another context or other people have > solved the problem before one even knew the current one existed.   > OK, so looking at a similar context in which there is already a > solution. > When measuring peak flow rates for asthma one measures the best of > three ie the highest reading.  That seems reasonable. It measures what > one’s lungs CAN do. The assumption is the other lower readings arose > from something like mistiming the puff.   > Is the blood pressure situation truly analogous? > Are we looking for the best reading in the blood pressure case? > OK, so eliciting what others already know about the situation. > For those of you who regularly take blood pressure readings, > 1.  How many readings do you take at one session? > 2.  Which one, if any, do you record? > 3.  What’s the rationale behind your strategy?   > Thanks,

 I take my blood pressure at the free machines sited in many U.S. department stores.  I stop for a bit while shopping and test.  AFAIK,  the criteria for a meaningful b.p. test is a "relaxed", "resting" test with the sensor at heart level.   I think I once read that the patient should sit quietly for 10 minutes before taking the test.  I find that running around the store does not relax or rest me.   My first reading will be high, usually 140-145, then successive readings will decay to some constant value.   (My low-dose ARB seems to be holding me between 110 and 120.) Thus, I sit at the machine repeating the test until it seems to have   decayed to some stable value.  Sometimes that calls for 3 tests, sometimes 5 or more.  I also find that low blood sugar elevates b.p.  I try to schedule a b.p. test for normal to high bG.   This relationship is sometimes humorous in that an anomalous b.p. is sometimes my first warning of a dropping bG.  I have heard that the lie-down then sit-up/stand-up b.p. ratio is an indicator of vascular/arterial health.  Unfortunately,  I don’t trust the sites I have found so far and I haven’t looked too hard for a reputable site.  If I ever break down and buy a home testing machine, I probably will get serious about such tests. Regards   Old Al (Insulin injector who often experiences bG lower than comfortable)

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> G’day G’day Folks, >   Some days it is like being born again.  One discovers little > challenges like gravity … unless one laughs at oneself and figures > one already knows the answer in another context or other people have > solved the problem before one even knew the current one existed. > OK, so looking at a similar context in which there is already a > solution. > When measuring peak flow rates for asthma one measures the best of > three ie the highest reading.  That seems reasonable. It measures what > one’s lungs CAN do. The assumption is the other lower readings arose > from something like mistiming the puff. > Is the blood pressure situation truly analogous? > Are we looking for the best reading in the blood pressure case?

Hi there Quentin, I don’t believe it is analogous.  Or at least, other than that an extremely low or high reading would be considered significant. Because then either there is something wrong with the equipment/method of use, or there is something seriously wrong with the patient!  I know this sounds obvious, but most doctors are pretty confidant about their equipment and it’s correct usage, because they are doing these test all the time, whereas with home testing one can’t be so sure. OTOH, for some conditions, the time of day, or other conditions at the time the test is done may be relevant.  Most doctor’s tests are done during normal office hours through the day.  One may be physically or emotionally stressed, just eaten, or relaxed and at ease.  Certainly one is advised not to test with a full bladder! Tests at night or out-of-hours are not common unless one is hospitalised or seriously ill anyway.  So home testing can reveal some interesting and significant readings that may not be detected otherwise. > OK, so eliciting what others already know about the situation. > For those of you who regularly take blood pressure readings, > 1.  How many readings do you take at one session?

Usually only one, but sometimes twice, I do one and my husband does one.  If the readings are pretty close, (and they usually are), then I have reasonable confidence in the accuracy. > 2.  Which one, if any, do you record?

All readings, noting time of day and other factors.  If there is a marked difference, I wait an hour and do another set.  > 3.  What’s the rationale behind your strategy? A check on the accuracy, especially in respect of the sensitivity of the machine, and my correct usage. Actually, after a while, as I became more experienced, I usually only did it once per session. Other earlier posts talked about things that can affect readings, like White Coat Syndrome, for example. FWIW, one medical site made a comment about that particular situation, and noted that if the reading is unacceptably high, it is still considered relevant, because it shows that BP can rise to dangerous levels if the person is stressed – NOT GOOD! I found it interesting that when I saw a cardio specialist, he tested my BP at 6 times during the course of the visit to his office. 1. Immediately on arrival (he instructed the nurse to do it).  Then I waited some time  before being called in. 2. Once I was seated in the office. 3. After chatting about my medical history, looking at test results etc (about 1/2 hr later). 4. Told to go into next room, remove top clothing etc, and sit on the examining table – he would be a little time, he said, so just relax.  He came in about 10 mins later,  and tested me in sitting position. 5. Told to lie down, tested again. 6. Told to stand on the floor, tested again. All readings were noted down without comment.  I have no idea what conclusions or method of analysis were used.  I now kind of wish I’d asked, but he seemed pretty pre-occupied, and I didn’t like to interrupt.  He studied them for some time in silence, with no comment, before indicating what further tests he wanted me to undergo. At home, I used to test about 4 times a day, on first rising, mid-afternoon, early evening and late (around midnight).  There was a consistant record of dangerously high readings from around 11.0 pm to 3 am.  The rest of the time, readings were only "slightly" elevated,  and although this wasn’t too good, and I WAS prescibed medicaion, there was no cause for alarm.  Since I was also getting chest pain late at night, when I reported my results of the tests to my GP, he considered this serious enough to warrant immediate investigation, and referred me accordingly.  Earlier complalnts re the chest pain alone had been ignored. I think that home testing is a bit like  testing bg, trends and patterns over a period of time can reveal some interesting information.  Either re-assurance that there is nothing seriously wrong, or there is something that should be investigated further. I hope this is some help by adding more anecdotal data to your file! Annette — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

This post not CC’d by email – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hello Quentin, >At the doctors office it is taken once by the nurse and most doctors >will take it again when you are in the room with him/her.  The doctor >takes it again to see if it has gone "up" any.  If it has, then that >means when you are stressed (most are when seeing the doctor) and that >your bp med may not be working that well.  It means you have white coat >hypertension, which means that anytime you are stressed, your bp is >going up even when on meds.  If it goes too high, they will usually end >up changing the particular med that you on.  Most will give it at least >one more visit before they do that, though.  At least this is what I >have found out. >When I check at home, I usually only check it in the mornings and the >evenings (once each time).  I do not check it all of the time, but at >least once or twice a month I have a period of time where I keep tabs on >it to make sure the bp med is still working (maybe 5 days in a row).  I >do record the readings and other specifics (under stress, sick, etc.). >I am probably not what you would consider a "regular" checker as I do >not check it everyday.

G’day G’day Dot,  I reckon that is about the best strategy one can have.  You do it when you use the results to learn something from.  Raw data by itself is pretty pointless.  Its changing behaviour in the right direction that matter. >My bp ususally runs around 120/70.

Which leads me to wonder why you test.  Is the 120/70 with meds? Best wishes, >Best, >Dot >Type 2  Diag 8/2001

– Quentin Grady       ^  ^  / New Zealand,       >#,#< [                     / /     "… and the blind dog was leading." http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Response:

> IF you test both arms seriatum and there is a sicnificant difference betwen them, soemthing is wrong, possibly a blockage somewhere.

This is a good point. My brother-in-law was the first person I heard mention this. He always gets a higher reading on his right arm than his left. Let say you go to the doctor’s office and take your meter with you to try and test their comparability – yours on one arm and the doctors on the other. You really might not prove anything. Lada da da! :) Frank

Response:

This post not CC’d by email > IF you test both arms seriatum and there is a sicnificant difference betwen them, soemthing is wrong, possibly a blockage somewhere. >This is a good point. My brother-in-law was the first person I heard >mention this. He always gets a higher reading on his right arm than his >left. >Let say you go to the doctor’s office and take your meter with you to >try and test their comparability – yours on one arm and the doctors on >the other. You really might not prove anything. Lada da da! :) >Frank

Oh Frank, you’re wicked. — Quentin Grady       ^  ^  / New Zealand,       >#,#< [                     / /     "… and the blind dog was leading." http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Response:

This post not CC’d by email >Hi Quentin, >answer to your questions >1.  I take one reading >2.  not applicable >3.  I like what I see and quit while I am ahead. >:-) >Loretta

ROTFL   Great attitude. — Quentin Grady       ^  ^  / New Zealand,       >#,#< [                     / /     "… and the blind dog was leading." http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Response:

Julie , W.Baker , Yeah , thats one thing that really can not be done on those free drug-store automatic BP test machines , they are only set-up for the Left arm , I believe tim – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > <snip> > IF you test both arms seriatum and there is a sicnificant difference > betwen them, soemthing is wrong, possibly a blockage somewhere. > Interesting.  When I was pregnant, they used to get signifigantly different > readings from one side to the other.  Can’t remember now which side was > which.  Guess I should check that now and see if it’s still the same. > <snip>

Response:

NO WAY would an eye-doctor get even the slightest chance to test me for glacoma the " old-fashioned " way !!! I would be RUNNING out the door for another DR. , IMMEDIATELY !!! tim – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> G’day G’day Folks, >   Some days it is like being born again.  One discovers little > challenges like gravity … unless one laughs at oneself and figures > one already knows the answer in another context or other people have > solved the problem before one even knew the current one existed. > OK, so looking at a similar context in which there is already a > solution. > When measuring peak flow rates for asthma one measures the best of > three ie the highest reading.  That seems reasonable. It measures what > one’s lungs CAN do. The assumption is the other lower readings arose > from something like mistiming the puff. > Is the blood pressure situation truly analogous? > Are we looking for the best reading in the blood pressure case? > OK, so eliciting what others already know about the situation. > For those of you who regularly take blood pressure readings, > 1.  How many readings do you take at one session? > 2.  Which one, if any, do you record? > 3.  What’s the rationale behind your strategy? > I don’t currently take any BP readings unless for some reason I think it > might be out of whack.  I’ve had slightly high BP since my mid 20’s.  It > seems to be very well controlled with medication and my current Dr. sees no > reason for me to monitor it at home on a regular basis.  This was not always > so.  When I was going to the military facility in Cape Cod, the Dr. I saw > wanted me to keep a log of my BP readings.  He suggested twice daily random > readings, but I often did more readings just for the heck of it.  Had a lot > of time on my hands and there’s not much to do in Cape Cod, especially in > the winter!  *L* > What I learned is that I could take reading after reading repeatedly, and > get entirely different numbers.  I also learned that I almost always got > lower readings at home.  Usually low enough to be well below normal.  But I > also studied up on taking the readings and when I did them at home, I did > everything the way it is supposed to be done.  For one thing, I made sure to > get a cuff that was large enough to fit well around my upper arm.  If the > cuff is too small (or too large) you’ll get a false reading.  I can’t tell > you how many times I’ve been to a new Dr. and they’ve used the standard cuff > on me.  They will then get a funny look on their face, then go get the > larger cuff.  They always get a better reading then.  My arms are not fat, > but they are very muscular and for that reason, I need the larger cuff. > Other things that can affect your reading are talking, eating, drinking, and > activity.  It’s best not to have anything to eat or drink immediately before > taking a reading and to sit still for 5 minutes before taking a reading. > Take good deep breaths while doing the reading.  I’ve found that shallow > breaths or holding your breath can give you a higher reading.  This is one > reason why my readings are always higher at the Drs. office.  I hate having > that cuff squeezing my arm.  I’m fine to do it to myself, but I dislike > having anyone else do it to me.  I get sort of panicky.  I think this is > because I once had a nurse pump the cuff up on my arm, then leave the room > to talk on the phone to her boyfriend.  She left me like that for about 5 > minutes.  I was much younger then and didn’t know what to do.  I thought if > I took the cuff off I might break it or something, so I sat there suffering > and seething.  Needless to say, my reading was quite high then! > And at one point, my eye Dr. feared I had glaucoma.  They had gotten a new > machine at their office that puffs air into the center of your eye to check > the pressure.  The person doing it wasn’t doing it right.  If done right, it > doesn’t hurt.  But she kept missing the center of my eye and that not only > hurt, but dried my eyes out.  I was so tense from that they couldn’t get a > decent reading.  The Dr. then did an experiment.  He tested my BP using an > arm cuff.  It was normal.  He then seated me at the machine and tested it > again.  It went WAY high!  He also did the old fashioned glaucoma test where > the eye is numbed with cocaine and a needle is inserted to check the > pressure.  No glaucoma. > Also, when I was going to the Dr. in Cape Cod, they guy who often did the BP > tests was really chatty.  He was a really nice guy and had just come from > the area where I grew up.  So he would strike up a conversation with me > about the Seattle area.  This was nice, but I would get excited in talking > to him, and my BP would go up.  I kept telling him that it’s best not to > talk during a reading and that I feared that our conversations were giving > me higher readings.  So he agreed that the next time I came in, he would let > someone else do my BP.  Sure enough, I got a decent reading. > So while I know all these things, it does pose some questions in my mind. > Most of us do not spend our days sitting around breathing deeply and doing > nothing.  We have conversations.  We get excited.  We get tense and stressed > out.  We eat, exercise, etc.  In fact, we probably spend most of our day > doing those things instead of sitting around attempting to relax.  So it > almost seems better to me to go for a random reading without all the prep > stuff. > Another thing I’ve been told is that some people have a problem with BP that > relates to sitting, standing or lying down.  Their BP might be fine for most > of the day, but might go too high or too low when changing positions.  For > that reason, it’s a good idea to take occasional tests in different > positions and immediately after changing positions.

Response:

<snip> > IF you test both arms seriatum and there is a sicnificant difference > betwen them, soemthing is wrong, possibly a blockage somewhere.

Interesting.  When I was pregnant, they used to get signifigantly different readings from one side to the other.  Can’t remember now which side was which.  Guess I should check that now and see if it’s still the same. <snip> — Type 2 http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

Hi Quentin, answer to your questions 1.  I take one reading 2.  not applicable 3.  I like what I see and quit while I am ahead. :-) Loretta — In tribute to the United States of America and the State of Israel, two bastions of strength in a world filled with strife and terrorism.

Response:

This post not CC’d by email – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >I don’t take my bp as faithfully as I might, but have a fewsomewhat >non-systematic comments.  My bp machine booklet and Endo said don’t take >one test on the sme are right after another.  You will get a lower , and >false reading because something happens to the arteries. *(They told me >what the something was, but I am havein ga senior moment.) >IF you test both arms seriatum and there is a sicnificant difference >betwen them, soemthing is wrong, possibly a blockage somewhere. >IF you rest after even mild exercise (like walkin garound the rom, or from >one room to another and then test 15 mins or so later after yu have been >sitting and there is a drop in your bp, you are in bad shape and need to >do more aerobic exercise.   >Don’t know if any of this helps you in your quest or not, but it is the >little that I know.

G’day G’day Wendy,     I’m sure it will help.  In my experience even when someone mentions something and can’t remember all the details … it reminds someone else of an important point … the collective mind at work. Talking about knowing whether one is in good shape or not, how significant in pulse rate.   I tested three times in a row and got 51 beats per minute +/- 1. Best wishes, >Wendy

– Quentin Grady       ^  ^  / New Zealand,       >#,#< [                     / /     "… and the blind dog was leading." http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> G’day G’day Folks, >   Some days it is like being born again.  One discovers little > challenges like gravity … unless one laughs at oneself and figures > one already knows the answer in another context or other people have > solved the problem before one even knew the current one existed. > OK, so looking at a similar context in which there is already a > solution. > When measuring peak flow rates for asthma one measures the best of > three ie the highest reading.  That seems reasonable. It measures what > one’s lungs CAN do. The assumption is the other lower readings arose > from something like mistiming the puff. > Is the blood pressure situation truly analogous? > Are we looking for the best reading in the blood pressure case? > OK, so eliciting what others already know about the situation. > For those of you who regularly take blood pressure readings, > 1.  How many readings do you take at one session? > 2.  Which one, if any, do you record? > 3.  What’s the rationale behind your strategy?

I don’t currently take any BP readings unless for some reason I think it might be out of whack.  I’ve had slightly high BP since my mid 20’s.  It seems to be very well controlled with medication and my current Dr. sees no reason for me to monitor it at home on a regular basis.  This was not always so.  When I was going to the military facility in Cape Cod, the Dr. I saw wanted me to keep a log of my BP readings.  He suggested twice daily random readings, but I often did more readings just for the heck of it.  Had a lot of time on my hands and there’s not much to do in Cape Cod, especially in the winter!  *L* What I learned is that I could take reading after reading repeatedly, and get entirely different numbers.  I also learned that I almost always got lower readings at home.  Usually low enough to be well below normal.  But I also studied up on taking the readings and when I did them at home, I did everything the way it is supposed to be done.  For one thing, I made sure to get a cuff that was large enough to fit well around my upper arm.  If the cuff is too small (or too large) you’ll get a false reading.  I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been to a new Dr. and they’ve used the standard cuff on me.  They will then get a funny look on their face, then go get the larger cuff.  They always get a better reading then.  My arms are not fat, but they are very muscular and for that reason, I need the larger cuff. Other things that can affect your reading are talking, eating, drinking, and activity.  It’s best not to have anything to eat or drink immediately before taking a reading and to sit still for 5 minutes before taking a reading. Take good deep breaths while doing the reading.  I’ve found that shallow breaths or holding your breath can give you a higher reading.  This is one reason why my readings are always higher at the Drs. office.  I hate having that cuff squeezing my arm.  I’m fine to do it to myself, but I dislike having anyone else do it to me.  I get sort of panicky.  I think this is because I once had a nurse pump the cuff up on my arm, then leave the room to talk on the phone to her boyfriend.  She left me like that for about 5 minutes.  I was much younger then and didn’t know what to do.  I thought if I took the cuff off I might break it or something, so I sat there suffering and seething.  Needless to say, my reading was quite high then! And at one point, my eye Dr. feared I had glaucoma.  They had gotten a new machine at their office that puffs air into the center of your eye to check the pressure.  The person doing it wasn’t doing it right.  If done right, it doesn’t hurt.  But she kept missing the center of my eye and that not only hurt, but dried my eyes out.  I was so tense from that they couldn’t get a decent reading.  The Dr. then did an experiment.  He tested my BP using an arm cuff.  It was normal.  He then seated me at the machine and tested it again.  It went WAY high!  He also did the old fashioned glaucoma test where the eye is numbed with cocaine and a needle is inserted to check the pressure.  No glaucoma. Also, when I was going to the Dr. in Cape Cod, they guy who often did the BP tests was really chatty.  He was a really nice guy and had just come from the area where I grew up.  So he would strike up a conversation with me about the Seattle area.  This was nice, but I would get excited in talking to him, and my BP would go up.  I kept telling him that it’s best not to talk during a reading and that I feared that our conversations were giving me higher readings.  So he agreed that the next time I came in, he would let someone else do my BP.  Sure enough, I got a decent reading. So while I know all these things, it does pose some questions in my mind. Most of us do not spend our days sitting around breathing deeply and doing nothing.  We have conversations.  We get excited.  We get tense and stressed out.  We eat, exercise, etc.  In fact, we probably spend most of our day doing those things instead of sitting around attempting to relax.  So it almost seems better to me to go for a random reading without all the prep stuff. Another thing I’ve been told is that some people have a problem with BP that relates to sitting, standing or lying down.  Their BP might be fine for most of the day, but might go too high or too low when changing positions.  For that reason, it’s a good idea to take occasional tests in different positions and immediately after changing positions. — Type 2 http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

Hello Quentin, At the doctors office it is taken once by the nurse and most doctors will take it again when you are in the room with him/her.  The doctor takes it again to see if it has gone "up" any.  If it has, then that means when you are stressed (most are when seeing the doctor) and that your bp med may not be working that well.  It means you have white coat hypertension, which means that anytime you are stressed, your bp is going up even when on meds.  If it goes too high, they will usually end up changing the particular med that you on.  Most will give it at least one more visit before they do that, though.  At least this is what I have found out. When I check at home, I usually only check it in the mornings and the evenings (once each time).  I do not check it all of the time, but at least once or twice a month I have a period of time where I keep tabs on it to make sure the bp med is still working (maybe 5 days in a row).  I do record the readings and other specifics (under stress, sick, etc.). I am probably not what you would consider a "regular" checker as I do not check it everyday. My bp ususally runs around 120/70. Best, Dot Type 2  Diag 8/2001 – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >G’day G’day Folks, >  Some days it is like being born again.  One discovers little >challenges like gravity … unless one laughs at oneself and figures >one already knows the answer in another context or other people have >solved the problem before one even knew the current one existed.   >OK, so looking at a similar context in which there is already a >solution. >When measuring peak flow rates for asthma one measures the best of >three ie the highest reading.  That seems reasonable. It measures what >one’s lungs CAN do. The assumption is the other lower readings arose >from something like mistiming the puff.   >Is the blood pressure situation truly analogous? >Are we looking for the best reading in the blood pressure case? >OK, so eliciting what others already know about the situation. >For those of you who regularly take blood pressure readings, >1.  How many readings do you take at one session? >2.  Which one, if any, do you record? >3.  What’s the rationale behind your strategy?   >Thanks,

Response:

: G’day G’day Folks, :   Some days it is like being born again.  One discovers little : challenges like gravity … unless one laughs at oneself and figures : one already knows the answer in another context or other people have : solved the problem before one even knew the current one existed.   : OK, so looking at a similar context in which there is already a : solution. : When measuring peak flow rates for asthma one measures the best of : three ie the highest reading.  That seems reasonable. It measures what : one’s lungs CAN do. The assumption is the other lower readings arose : from something like mistiming the puff.   : Is the blood pressure situation truly analogous? : Are we looking for the best reading in the blood pressure case? : OK, so eliciting what others already know about the situation. : For those of you who regularly take blood pressure readings, : 1.  How many readings do you take at one session? : 2.  Which one, if any, do you record? : 3.  What’s the rationale behind your strategy?   : Thanks, :   : — : Quentin Grady       ^  ^  / : New Zealand,       >#,#< [ :                     / /     : "… and the blind dog was leading." : http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin I don’t take my bp as faithfully as I might, but have a fewsomewhat non-systematic comments.  My bp machine booklet and Endo said don’t take one test on the sme are right after another.  You will get a lower , and false reading because something happens to the arteries. *(They told me what the something was, but I am havein ga senior moment.) IF you test both arms seriatum and there is a sicnificant difference betwen them, soemthing is wrong, possibly a blockage somewhere. IF you rest after even mild exercise (like walkin garound the rom, or from one room to another and then test 15 mins or so later after yu have been sitting and there is a drop in your bp, you are in bad shape and need to do more aerobic exercise.   Don’t know if any of this helps you in your quest or not, but it is the little that I know. Wendy

Response:

G’day G’day Folks,   Some days it is like being born again.  One discovers little challenges like gravity … unless one laughs at oneself and figures one already knows the answer in another context or other people have solved the problem before one even knew the current one existed.   OK, so looking at a similar context in which there is already a solution. When measuring peak flow rates for asthma one measures the best of three ie the highest reading.  That seems reasonable. It measures what one’s lungs CAN do. The assumption is the other lower readings arose from something like mistiming the puff.   Is the blood pressure situation truly analogous? Are we looking for the best reading in the blood pressure case? OK, so eliciting what others already know about the situation. For those of you who regularly take blood pressure readings, 1.  How many readings do you take at one session? 2.  Which one, if any, do you record? 3.  What’s the rationale behind your strategy?   Thanks, — Quentin Grady       ^  ^  / New Zealand,       >#,#< [                     / /     "… and the blind dog was leading." http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Response:

Categories: Exercise Asthma

Question:

I read that vitamin E was good to lower blood sugar, and was also a way to lower blood pressure. It was recommended that 400IU taken daily would be adequate./ I am typeII, and have high blood pressure. I am on medication and exercise regularly. Blood pressure is fine and blood sugar is usually below 140. Morning readings are in the lower 90’s. What recommendations do you have to use the supplemental vitamins?

Response:

> I read that vitamin E was good > to lower blood sugar, and was >also a way to lower blood pressure.

I’ve never heard either of these claims.  I take it and it lowers neither one for me. > It was recommended > that 400IU taken daily would > be adequate./ I am typeII, and > have high blood pressure. I am > on medication and exercise > regularly. Blood pressure is > fine and blood sugar is usually > below 140. Morning readings > are in the lower 90’s. What > recommendations do you have to > use the supplemental vitamins?

I’m no expert on vitamins.  I have read so many things about vitamin E that I get confused.  I simply take whatever is the cheapest.  Don’t know if it does me any good or not. — Type 2 http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

Hi, I can not take multi Vit/Min.  They keep me awake all night. As long as you are eating a balanced diet and get plenty of exercise there is no need for extra Vitamins. I am one of the few who can not take Vit E  I get chest pains with it and raises my blood pressure.  Strange isn’t it ! Ask your Dr. the next visit what he or she recommends. Ira T2

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I read that vitamin E was good > to lower blood sugar, and was >also a way to lower blood pressure. > I’ve never heard either of these claims.  I take it and it lowers neither > one for me. > It was recommended > that 400IU taken daily would > be adequate./ I am typeII, and > have high blood pressure. I am > on medication and exercise > regularly. Blood pressure is > fine and blood sugar is usually > below 140. Morning readings > are in the lower 90’s. What > recommendations do you have to > use the supplemental vitamins? > I’m no expert on vitamins.  I have read so many things about vitamin E that > I get confused.  I simply take whatever is the cheapest.  Don’t know if it > does me any good or not. > — > Type 2 > http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

I take Vit E for something totally unrelated to diabetes.  It has absolutely no effect on my BG or BP, as far as I know.  Nor have I ever heard this claim before.  I’m wondering who told you this. — Best wishes Louise Type 2 since 2000, controlling by diet and exercise

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I read that vitamin E was good > to lower blood sugar, and was > also a way to lower blood pressure. It was recommended > that 400IU taken daily would > be adequate./ I am typeII, and > have high blood pressure. I am > on medication and exercise > regularly. Blood pressure is > fine and blood sugar is usually > below 140. Morning readings > are in the lower 90’s. What > recommendations do you have to > use the supplemental vitamins?

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >I read that vitamin E was good >to lower blood sugar, and was >also a way to lower blood pressure. It was recommended >that 400IU taken daily would >be adequate./ I am typeII, and >have high blood pressure. I am >on medication and exercise >regularly. Blood pressure is >fine and blood sugar is usually >below 140. Morning readings >are in the lower 90’s. What >recommendations do you have to >use the supplemental vitamins?

http://doctoryourself.com Type in ‘Shute protocol’ .. If you supplement tocopherol / vitamin E you start low .. and slowly ramp yourself up. It is such powerful stuff you may have an adverse reaction due to your .. meds. You may now not need the same amount as before and may be now taking too much medication. Who loves ya. Tom Jesus Was A Vegetarian! http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com Man Is A Herbivore! http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/manisaherbivore DEAD PEOPLE WALKING http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/deadpeoplewalking

Response:

My doctor recommended that I take 400 IU of vitamin E and a baby aspirin daily.  I am a T-1 and have high BP also. It seems that both of these are blood thinners and every time my arms touched something abrasive I would start bleeding. When I got blood tests at the lab the whole area would turn blue.  I stopped the vitamin E and still take the baby aspirin 3 days a week per doctors instructions.  It may be that I just have thin blood as I had two liver biopsies in the sixties after I came back from Thailand with infectious hepatitis.  During both procedures I had to take vitamin K to thicken my blood. Charlie        (another Charles )

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I read that vitamin E was good > to lower blood sugar, and was > also a way to lower blood pressure. It was recommended > that 400IU taken daily would > be adequate./ I am typeII, and > have high blood pressure. I am > on medication and exercise > regularly. Blood pressure is > fine and blood sugar is usually > below 140. Morning readings > are in the lower 90’s. What > recommendations do you have to > use the supplemental vitamins?

Response:

> I read that vitamin E was good > to lower blood sugar, and was > also a way to lower blood pressure. It was recommended > that 400IU taken daily would > be adequate./ I am typeII, and > have high blood pressure. I am > on medication and exercise > regularly. Blood pressure is > fine and blood sugar is usually > below 140. Morning readings > are in the lower 90’s. What > recommendations do you have to > use the supplemental vitamins?

I have not heard that about Vit. E, but I take it during the winter months. My doctor recommended it for severe dry skin and it seems to help along with some lotion.

Response:

Hi, Dr Bernstein writes: " vit e reduces the destructives effects of high BG, in

a dose dependent fashion. Also, it has been shown to lower insulin resistance." He recommends 400-1200 IU per day. I’ve been taking 400 IU for 3 years now with no side effects. Fred Henzi 67, T2, 60 g carb per day, no meds.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I read that vitamin E was good > to lower blood sugar, and was > also a way to lower blood pressure. It was recommended > that 400IU taken daily would > be adequate./ I am typeII, and > have high blood pressure. I am > on medication and exercise > regularly. Blood pressure is > fine and blood sugar is usually > below 140. Morning readings > are in the lower 90’s. What > recommendations do you have to > use the supplemental vitamins?

Response:

> Dr Bernstein writes: " vit e reduces the destructives effects of high BG, in > a dose dependent fashion. Also, it has been shown to lower insulin > resistance." > He recommends 400-1200 IU per day. > I’ve been taking 400 IU for 3 years now with no side effects. > Fred Henzi > 67, T2, 60 g carb per day, no meds.

—– I have been on 400 IU for nearly 9 years. I have had no side effects. I also take a "one a day" type multivitamin/mineral combination. I can’t swear to what’s making the difference but I have not had a cold or virus in all those years, my asthma is the best it’s ever been and I feel wonderful. (G) Patricia 72,T2,50-60G Carb per day, Asthma med only…

Response:

Hi Patricia, I’m always glad to read from other low-carbers who are doing well. Sometimes I think I’m the only one who managed to stay low carb for three years. I also take a "one a day" combination, 300 g calcium and a spoonful of ground flax seed. Since I changed to low carb and got the A1c down to 5.4 I haven’t had any colds nor sinusitis either. Before, I was having chronic S. and frequent colds, especially after flights or exposure to dust. To me, dx in 2000, was a blessing in disguise. I finally did what I should have done years ago. First I lost 25 lbs, then switched to low carb and plenty of exercise and my health turned for the better. Life is good again and I enjoy retirement with gusto. Fred Henzi

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Dr Bernstein writes: " vit e reduces the destructives effects of high BG, in > a dose dependent fashion. Also, it has been shown to lower insulin > resistance." > He recommends 400-1200 IU per day. > I’ve been taking 400 IU for 3 years now with no side effects. > Fred Henzi > 67, T2, 60 g carb per day, no meds. > —– > I have been on 400 IU for nearly 9 years. I have had no side effects. I also > take a "one a day" type multivitamin/mineral combination. I can’t swear to > what’s making the difference but I have not had a cold or virus in all those > years, my asthma is the best it’s ever been and I feel wonderful. (G) > Patricia > 72,T2,50-60G Carb per day, Asthma med only…

Response:

> Hi Patricia, > I’m always glad to read from other low-carbers who are doing well. Sometimes > I think I’m the only one who managed to stay low carb for three years. > I also take a "one a day" combination, 300 g calcium and a spoonful of > ground flax seed. Since I changed to low carb and got the A1c down to 5.4 I > haven’t had any colds nor sinusitis either. Before, I was having chronic S. > and frequent colds, especially after flights or exposure to dust. > To me, dx in 2000, was a blessing in disguise. I finally did what I should > have done years ago. First I lost 25 lbs, then switched to low carb and > plenty of exercise and my health turned for the better. Life is good again > and I enjoy retirement with gusto. > Fred Henzi

Nice to hear from you, Fred. I agree that after many years of family, children, house, job and community service ….it’s very nice to be my own boss. LOL Since I started being creative about my diet I have been taken off BP pills, statins and take no diabetic type meds. I am careful about what I eat and pass by many of former favorites. I’m a very lucky person and I know it….(G) Best, Patricia

Response:

This post not CC’d by email >I read that vitamin E was good >to lower blood sugar, and was >also a way to lower blood pressure. It was recommended >that 400IU taken daily would >be adequate./ I am typeII, and >have high blood pressure. I am >on medication and exercise >regularly. Blood pressure is >fine and blood sugar is usually >below 140. Morning readings >are in the lower 90’s. What >recommendations do you have to >use the supplemental vitamins?

G’day G’day Folks,    While I don’t have time today to go into the ins and outs of Vit E, let me tell you about one interesting snippet from the fields of genetic engineering.  There are two families, the tocopherols and the tocotrienols that share the common name Vit E.  The tocotrienols are considered better antioxidants than the tocopherols.  The advantage is so considerable that there are plans to transfer genes from barley or wheat for tocotrienol to maize which normally only produces tocopherols. Best wishes, — Quentin Grady       ^  ^  / New Zealand,       >#,#< [                     / /     "… and the blind dog was leading." http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Response:

Julie , I take a liquid miltivitamin , it is the only one that has ever really helped me ….And it does help me alot (100%RDA vitamin E and many others ) . To me , all the rest are a total waste of money . tim – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I read that vitamin E was good > to lower blood sugar, and was >also a way to lower blood pressure. > I’ve never heard either of these claims.  I take it and it lowers neither > one for me. > It was recommended > that 400IU taken daily would > be adequate./ I am typeII, and > have high blood pressure. I am > on medication and exercise > regularly. Blood pressure is > fine and blood sugar is usually > below 140. Morning readings > are in the lower 90’s. What > recommendations do you have to > use the supplemental vitamins? > I’m no expert on vitamins.  I have read so many things about vitamin E that > I get confused.  I simply take whatever is the cheapest.  Don’t know if it > does me any good or not.

Response:

Joe Guy , Try " Zimms Crack Creme " , it works great om my girlfriend Marys dry skin !!! tim – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I read that vitamin E was good > to lower blood sugar, and was > also a way to lower blood pressure. It was recommended > that 400IU taken daily would > be adequate./ I am typeII, and > have high blood pressure. I am > on medication and exercise > regularly. Blood pressure is > fine and blood sugar is usually > below 140. Morning readings > are in the lower 90’s. What > recommendations do you have to > use the supplemental vitamins? > I have not heard that about Vit. E, but I take it during the winter months. > My doctor recommended it for severe dry skin and it seems to help along with > some lotion.

Response:

Also a product called Miracle Hand Repair works well, but Crack Cream is cheaper. — Cheri

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Joe Guy , >Try " Zimms Crack Creme " , it works great om my girlfriend Marys dry skin !!! >tim

Response:

Categories: Allergic Asthma

Question:

I have been experiencing difficulty swallowing persistantly for about 2 months.  I am actively persuing this with my gastroenterologist as well as my allergist, however I am am looking for insight and ideas of what might be causing this. A bit about my medical history… I am 25 years old male, 5′ 11" tall, and weigh 135 lbs (underweight for my height, but healthy).  I bike or run 2-3 times a week, and lift weights 1-2 times a week.  I typically eat a lot (perhaps sometimes overeat).  I was diagnosed with "erosive esophagus" during an endoscopy about 1.5 years ago and have been on prevacid 30mg since then.  I also have significant nasal allergies, and have been getting allergy injections for about 2 years now.  Don’t know if any of that is relavent, but just in case… My symptoms…It feels like my throat is swollen.  Not sore, just swollen/irritated.  In the morning when I wake up, it is typically fine, but as the day wears on it begins to become worse, and it is definitely worse after meals.  If I eat a full meal (or especially if I overeat, it becomes accutely worse, to the point where I feel short of breath, although I can really still breath fine).  The sensation is not painful, but just very uncomfortable…like I have to keep swallowing, but can’t get everything down, if that makes sense.  There have only been a few instances where it was bad enough that I could not eat.  Usually I feel fine WHILE I am eating but then the problem is worse once I am done, and persists for several hours afterwards.  I frequently feel like I need to burp, but can’t.  Sometimes when I do burb, it makes the feeling in my throat worse (perhaps stomach juices are making it the whole way up to my throat?).  I have not had much heartburn, because I take the prevacid.  Doubling my prevacid to 30mg twice daily did not help.  If anything, it made the problem worse. When this first started, my allergies were flaring up and I had a significant amount of drainage, so I thought the problem might be allergy related.  Since then, my allergies have cleared up, but the problem persists (this is when it became more apparent that it was worsened by eating full meals). A couple of questions…. If this is GERD related, why isn’t the prevacid keeping my stomach acid at bay? Is there another medication I should try?  Prilosec or Nexium perhaps? I was fine on Prevacid for over a year.  Might this be an allergic reaction to the medication? Could this be allergy related?  Would it make sense that my drainage from allergies makes it worse? Any insight is appreciated. -mark

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I have been experiencing difficulty swallowing persistantly for about > 2 months.  I am actively persuing this with my gastroenterologist as > well as my allergist, however I am am looking for insight and ideas of > what might be causing this. > A bit about my medical history… I am 25 years old male, 5′ 11" tall, > and weigh 135 lbs (underweight for my height, but healthy).  I bike or > run 2-3 times a week, and lift weights 1-2 times a week.  I typically > eat a lot (perhaps sometimes overeat).  I was diagnosed with "erosive > esophagus" during an endoscopy about 1.5 years ago and have been on > prevacid 30mg since then.  I also have significant nasal allergies, > and have been getting allergy injections for about 2 years now.  Don’t > know if any of that is relavent, but just in case… > My symptoms…It feels like my throat is swollen.  Not sore, just > swollen/irritated.  In the morning when I wake up, it is typically > fine, but as the day wears on it begins to become worse, and it is > definitely worse after meals.

Sounds like Gerd. Feel like you have the lump in the throat? If I eat a full meal (or especially if – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I overeat, it becomes accutely worse, to the point where I feel short > of breath, although I can really still breath fine).  The sensation is > not painful, but just very uncomfortable…like I have to keep > swallowing, but can’t get everything down, if that makes sense.  There > have only been a few instances where it was bad enough that I could > not eat.  Usually I feel fine WHILE I am eating but then the problem > is worse once I am done, and persists for several hours afterwards.  I > frequently feel like I need to burp, but can’t.  Sometimes when I do > burb, it makes the feeling in my throat worse (perhaps stomach juices > are making it the whole way up to my throat?).  I have not had much > heartburn, because I take the prevacid.  Doubling my prevacid to 30mg > twice daily did not help.  If anything, it made the problem worse. > When this first started, my allergies were flaring up and I had a > significant amount of drainage, so I thought the problem might be > allergy related.  Since then, my allergies have cleared up, but the > problem persists (this is when it became more apparent that it was > worsened by eating full meals). > A couple of questions…. > If this is GERD related, why isn’t the prevacid keeping my stomach > acid at bay?

It doesnt work on everyone… > Is there another medication I should try?  Prilosec or Nexium perhaps?

yes > I was fine on Prevacid for over a year.  Might this be an allergic > reaction to the medication?

No but ask your doctor to change your meds. > Could this be allergy related?  Would it make sense that my drainage > from allergies makes it worse?

Alot of people have allergies and gerd. I dont think the two are related but you can ask your doctor. > Any insight is appreciated. > -mark

I have the lump in the throat feeling, asthmatic feeling because of acid, and sometimes pains… it is acid reflux. I have never had the endeoscopy like you have but plan too… There are surgeries that can be done because of them but its up to you and your doctor to discuss the alternatives. Ask me any questions.

Response:

I think you need to see a specialist.  Perhaps visit a swallowing clinic. There are many good ones in the US.  Where are you located?

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I have been experiencing difficulty swallowing persistantly for about > 2 months.  I am actively persuing this with my gastroenterologist as > well as my allergist, however I am am looking for insight and ideas of > what might be causing this. > A bit about my medical history… I am 25 years old male, 5′ 11" tall, > and weigh 135 lbs (underweight for my height, but healthy).  I bike or > run 2-3 times a week, and lift weights 1-2 times a week.  I typically > eat a lot (perhaps sometimes overeat).  I was diagnosed with "erosive > esophagus" during an endoscopy about 1.5 years ago and have been on > prevacid 30mg since then.  I also have significant nasal allergies, > and have been getting allergy injections for about 2 years now.  Don’t > know if any of that is relavent, but just in case… > My symptoms…It feels like my throat is swollen.  Not sore, just > swollen/irritated.  In the morning when I wake up, it is typically > fine, but as the day wears on it begins to become worse, and it is > definitely worse after meals.  If I eat a full meal (or especially if > I overeat, it becomes accutely worse, to the point where I feel short > of breath, although I can really still breath fine).  The sensation is > not painful, but just very uncomfortable…like I have to keep > swallowing, but can’t get everything down, if that makes sense.  There > have only been a few instances where it was bad enough that I could > not eat.  Usually I feel fine WHILE I am eating but then the problem > is worse once I am done, and persists for several hours afterwards.  I > frequently feel like I need to burp, but can’t.  Sometimes when I do > burb, it makes the feeling in my throat worse (perhaps stomach juices > are making it the whole way up to my throat?).  I have not had much > heartburn, because I take the prevacid.  Doubling my prevacid to 30mg > twice daily did not help.  If anything, it made the problem worse. > When this first started, my allergies were flaring up and I had a > significant amount of drainage, so I thought the problem might be > allergy related.  Since then, my allergies have cleared up, but the > problem persists (this is when it became more apparent that it was > worsened by eating full meals). > A couple of questions…. > If this is GERD related, why isn’t the prevacid keeping my stomach > acid at bay? > Is there another medication I should try?  Prilosec or Nexium perhaps? > I was fine on Prevacid for over a year.  Might this be an allergic > reaction to the medication? > Could this be allergy related?  Would it make sense that my drainage > from allergies makes it worse? > Any insight is appreciated. > -mark

Response:

Can H. Pylori cause esophagitis?  Has anyone had symptoms where it just feels like the esophagus is swollen/irritated?  I rarely ever get heartburn anymore, but the one thing I have noticed is, if I take prevacid 30mg twice a day, the symptoms become accutely worse.  This almost seems like an infection to me.  Interestingly, if I stop the prevacid for a day or so, I do get mild heartburn, but it actually feels sort of soothing, and I don’t have the swollen feeling or difficulty swallowing while the heartburn is there.  I just can’t stand this uncomfortable swallowing feeling. Anyone have any experience with something like this? I have an endoscopy scheduled for sept 2nd, and am doing a 24hour pH test on Sept 11, so hopefully those 2 tests will reveal something… -mark – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I think you need to see a specialist.  Perhaps visit a swallowing clinic. > There are many good ones in the US.  Where are you located? > I have been experiencing difficulty swallowing persistantly for about > 2 months.  I am actively persuing this with my gastroenterologist as > well as my allergist, however I am am looking for insight and ideas of > what might be causing this. > A bit about my medical history… I am 25 years old male, 5′ 11" tall, > and weigh 135 lbs (underweight for my height, but healthy).  I bike or > run 2-3 times a week, and lift weights 1-2 times a week.  I typically > eat a lot (perhaps sometimes overeat).  I was diagnosed with "erosive > esophagus" during an endoscopy about 1.5 years ago and have been on > prevacid 30mg since then.  I also have significant nasal allergies, > and have been getting allergy injections for about 2 years now.  Don’t > know if any of that is relavent, but just in case… > My symptoms…It feels like my throat is swollen.  Not sore, just > swollen/irritated.  In the morning when I wake up, it is typically > fine, but as the day wears on it begins to become worse, and it is > definitely worse after meals.  If I eat a full meal (or especially if > I overeat, it becomes accutely worse, to the point where I feel short > of breath, although I can really still breath fine).  The sensation is > not painful, but just very uncomfortable…like I have to keep > swallowing, but can’t get everything down, if that makes sense.  There > have only been a few instances where it was bad enough that I could > not eat.  Usually I feel fine WHILE I am eating but then the problem > is worse once I am done, and persists for several hours afterwards.  I > frequently feel like I need to burp, but can’t.  Sometimes when I do > burb, it makes the feeling in my throat worse (perhaps stomach juices > are making it the whole way up to my throat?).  I have not had much > heartburn, because I take the prevacid.  Doubling my prevacid to 30mg > twice daily did not help.  If anything, it made the problem worse. > When this first started, my allergies were flaring up and I had a > significant amount of drainage, so I thought the problem might be > allergy related.  Since then, my allergies have cleared up, but the > problem persists (this is when it became more apparent that it was > worsened by eating full meals). > A couple of questions…. > If this is GERD related, why isn’t the prevacid keeping my stomach > acid at bay? > Is there another medication I should try?  Prilosec or Nexium perhaps? > I was fine on Prevacid for over a year.  Might this be an allergic > reaction to the medication? > Could this be allergy related?  Would it make sense that my drainage > from allergies makes it worse? > Any insight is appreciated. > -mark

Response:

> Can H. Pylori cause esophagitis?  Has anyone had symptoms where it > just feels like the esophagus is swollen/irritated?  I rarely ever get > heartburn anymore, but the one thing I have noticed is, if I take > prevacid 30mg twice a day, the symptoms become accutely worse.  This > almost seems like an infection to me.  Interestingly, if I stop the > prevacid for a day or so, I do get mild heartburn, but it actually > feels sort of soothing, and I don’t have the swollen feeling or > difficulty swallowing while the heartburn is there.  I just can’t > stand this uncomfortable swallowing feeling. > Anyone have any experience with something like this? > I have an endoscopy scheduled for sept 2nd, and am doing a 24hour pH > test on Sept 11, so hopefully those 2 tests will reveal something…

No, H. Pylori has nothing to do with GERD. In fact, for reasons that aren’t entirely clear, an H. pylori infection tends to ameliorate GERD. The EGD and 24 hour ambulatory pH test will be definitive. The pH test will tell whether or not you do have esophageal reflux, and the EGD will demonstrate whether or not you have the COMPLICATIONS of GERD, such as erosive esophagitis, stricture, or Barrett’s esophagus. 24 hour catheter-based ambulatory pH testing is a little problematic and its accuracy is impaired compared to more modern methods. It’s important, while the catheter is in place, to live a normal life. That is, eat the things you normally eat, do your normal activities etc. These things are hard to do when you have a tube down your nose connected to a device on your belt. A better test is 48 hour wireless ambulatory pH testing. This test uses a small, capsule-sized pH sensor that wireless transmits pH data to a pager-sized device you wear on your belt, or keep within 4 or 5 feet of you. There is no cather, it is completely comfortable, you can shower, eat or do any other normal activity. It is far more accurate than catheter-based pH testing. Look at http://tinyurl.com/k4yz for information on this method of pH testing and ask your gastroenterologist if it’s available to you. HMc

Response:

>  Since then, my allergies have cleared up, but the >problem persists (this is when it became more apparent that it was >worsened by eating full meals).

I suggest you try a completely gluten-free meal and see if you get the symptoms. You have some characteristics of undiagnosed celiac disease. Don <donwiss at panix.com>.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Can H. Pylori cause esophagitis?  Has anyone had symptoms where it > just feels like the esophagus is swollen/irritated?  I rarely ever get > heartburn anymore, but the one thing I have noticed is, if I take > prevacid 30mg twice a day, the symptoms become accutely worse.  This > almost seems like an infection to me.  Interestingly, if I stop the > prevacid for a day or so, I do get mild heartburn, but it actually > feels sort of soothing, and I don’t have the swollen feeling or > difficulty swallowing while the heartburn is there.  I just can’t > stand this uncomfortable swallowing feeling. > Anyone have any experience with something like this? > I have an endoscopy scheduled for sept 2nd, and am doing a 24hour pH > test on Sept 11, so hopefully those 2 tests will reveal something… > No, H. Pylori has nothing to do with GERD. In fact, for reasons that aren’t > entirely clear, an H. pylori infection tends to ameliorate GERD. > The EGD and 24 hour ambulatory pH test will be definitive. The pH test will > tell whether or not you do have esophageal reflux, and the EGD will > demonstrate whether or not you have the COMPLICATIONS of GERD, such as > erosive esophagitis, stricture, or Barrett’s esophagus. > 24 hour catheter-based ambulatory pH testing is a little problematic and its > accuracy is impaired compared to more modern methods. It’s important, while > the catheter is in place, to live a normal life. That is, eat the things you > normally eat, do your normal activities etc. These things are hard to do > when you have a tube down your nose connected to a device on your belt. A > better test is 48 hour wireless ambulatory pH testing. This test uses a > small, capsule-sized pH sensor that wireless transmits pH data to a > pager-sized device you wear on your belt, or keep within 4 or 5 feet of you. > There is no cather, it is completely comfortable, you can shower, eat or do > any other normal activity. It is far more accurate than catheter-based pH > testing. > Look at http://tinyurl.com/k4yz for information on this method of pH testing > and ask your gastroenterologist if it’s available to you. > HMc

Thanks for the info.  I will definitely ask my doctor about the "wireless" verysion of the pH test.  That sounds much more reasonable.  I guess if its not available, I will still do the catheter-based test, as it sounds like that test can provide a lot of good information. I already know from a past endoscopy that I have (or at least HAD) erosive esophagus.  I didn’t have any heartburn at the time of that diagnosis, but was prescribed prevacid 30mg, and have taken that daily since then (about 1.5 years ago).  I am very young for this, and I know that surgery might be a good option for me, based on the results of the pH test.  I read about the Stretta procedure, which sounds interesting.  Has anyone had that procedure, or does anyone have any advice on it? -mark

Response:

>   I read about the Stretta procedure, which sounds > interesting.  Has anyone had that procedure, or does anyone have any > advice on it?

I have done the Stretta procedure many times. Patient selection is critical to success of this procedure, but in the appropriate patient, it is an excellent option. It is entirely outpatient, has very few complications, very few side effects, and no activity or diet restrictions. The major disadvantage is that it can take months for the effects to manifest themselves. It has about an 80% – 90% success rate (off all meds within 1 year). Can’t be done in patients with a large hiatus hernia. Relative to anti-reflux procedures, I do about 60% lap fundoplications and 40% Stretta. If you have a history of erosive esophagitis observed on EGD, then the pH testing has little value since it is already established that you have severe GERD and that is the point of pH testing. You will need esophageal manometry, however, to make sure you have adequate esophageal function and no underlying motility disorders. HMc

Response:

Actually, I am on a gluten free diet full time already :)  I was diagnosed with celiac disease about 8 years ago.  The GERD symptoms started shortly afterwards, and became severe about 3 months ago.  It hasn’t been a very fun summer… -mark – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->  Since then, my allergies have cleared up, but the >problem persists (this is when it became more apparent that it was >worsened by eating full meals). > I suggest you try a completely gluten-free meal and see if you get the > symptoms. You have some characteristics of undiagnosed celiac disease. > Don <donwiss at panix.com>.

Response:

Thanks for the feedback.  I am definitely intrigued by the Stretta procedure.  I am very young (25 years old) to be having GERD this bad.  I want to weigh my options and make the appropriate choices, in terms of meds, or surgery, and if surgery, which one.  I have heard that the long term relapse rate is quite high with the lap fundoplications, and the complications such as dysphagia, difficulty belching, vomiting, etc., scare me a bit.  I like the idea of the Stretta procedure, but I guess it is too new to know if it will work long term (like for the rest of my life).  Do you have any thoughts on this?  Can a Stretta procedure be done more than once if needed? Last endoscopy, i was diagnosed with erosive esophagus (just 1 ulcer, I believe).  No hiatus hernia at that time (1.5 years ago).  I was on 30mg of prevacid since then, until it stopped working earlier this summer.  I am trying aciphex 20mg right now, but I can’t tell if it is helping any better yet.  It just seems surprising to me that I could still have symptoms, while on prevacid 30mg, which is pretty strong, right? I will find out more results in a little over a week when I have another endoscopy done. Are there any chances that being on a moderate/high dose of PPIs can allow problems such as yeast esophagitis, or something of that nature to happen in an immuno-competant person?  I feel like I am digging with a question like that, but this came on very suddenly, and has been very persistant for a couple months. -mark – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->   I read about the Stretta procedure, which sounds > interesting.  Has anyone had that procedure, or does anyone have any > advice on it? > I have done the Stretta procedure many times. Patient selection is critical > to success of this procedure, but in the appropriate patient, it is an > excellent option. It is entirely outpatient, has very few complications, > very few side effects, and no activity or diet restrictions. The major > disadvantage is that it can take months for the effects to manifest > themselves. It has about an 80% – 90% success rate (off all meds within 1 > year). Can’t be done in patients with a large hiatus hernia. Relative to > anti-reflux procedures, I do about 60% lap fundoplications and 40% Stretta. > If you have a history of erosive esophagitis observed on EGD, then the pH > testing has little value since it is already established that you have > severe GERD and that is the point of pH testing. You will need esophageal > manometry, however, to make sure you have adequate esophageal function and > no underlying motility disorders. > HMc

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Thanks for the feedback.  I am definitely intrigued by the Stretta > procedure.  I am very young (25 years old) to be having GERD this bad. >  I want to weigh my options and make the appropriate choices, in terms > of meds, or surgery, and if surgery, which one.  I have heard that the > long term relapse rate is quite high with the lap fundoplications, and > the complications such as dysphagia, difficulty belching, vomiting, > etc., scare me a bit.  I like the idea of the Stretta procedure, but I > guess it is too new to know if it will work long term (like for the > rest of my life).  Do you have any thoughts on this?  Can a Stretta > procedure be done more than once if needed? > Last endoscopy, i was diagnosed with erosive esophagus (just 1 ulcer, > I believe).  No hiatus hernia at that time (1.5 years ago).  I was on > 30mg of prevacid since then, until it stopped working earlier this > summer.  I am trying aciphex 20mg right now, but I can’t tell if it is > helping any better yet.  It just seems surprising to me that I could > still have symptoms, while on prevacid 30mg, which is pretty strong, > right? > I will find out more results in a little over a week when I have > another endoscopy done. > Are there any chances that being on a moderate/high dose of PPIs can > allow problems such as yeast esophagitis, or something of that nature > to happen in an immuno-competant person?  I feel like I am digging > with a question like that, but this came on very suddenly, and has > been very persistant for a couple months.

At 25, with a history of erosive esophagitis , the chances that PPI’s will control your GERD for the rest of your life are negligible, even with lifestyle modifications. Long term use of PPI’s will result in increasing polyp formation in your stomach due to the trophic changes of unopposed gastrin, but there is no evidence to support the assertion that it will increase your risk of gastric cancer. Stretta is new. It’s specific long-term effect isn’t known. However, the long term effects of radiofrequency energy on human tissue are known. Once collagen is deposited in the LES, and the afferent nerves are ablated, the science of the issue would lead one to believe that the effects are permanent. There are no long term studies to prove this, however. Yes, Stretta can be done more than once. Lap fundoplication is a good operation. The recurrence rate is 6-10% at 5 years in competent hands, the specific recurrence rate is surgeon-dependant. Dysphagia tends to be a temporary phenomenon, about 2-6 weeks and depends very much on the pre-operative motility of the esophagus. The decreased ability to belch can be problematic, but tends to decrease with time as the patient learns to not swallow air (now that he doesn’t need to do that to clear acid from the esophagus). IME, most patients find that to be an acceptable trade-off compared to a lifetime of poorly-controlled, or uncontrolled, GERD. HMc

Response:

>Actually, I am on a gluten free diet full time already :)  I was >diagnosed with celiac disease about 8 years ago.  The GERD symptoms >started shortly afterwards, and became severe about 3 months ago.  It >hasn’t been a very fun summer…

Are you on a dairy-free diet? Don <donwiss at panix.com>.

Response:

Hello again.  I just had my endoscopy today.  They said things looked "normal", which sounds like good news to me.  They gave me 4 pictures that they said we would discuss at my follow-up appointment (2 weeks from now).  I don’t know what each picture is of.  Just for fun, are there any gastroenterologists out there that could respond telling me exactly what I am looking at in each picture?  I posted them at: http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/Pictures/marksinners_ed.jpg Thanks! -mark – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Thanks for the feedback.  I am definitely intrigued by the Stretta > procedure.  I am very young (25 years old) to be having GERD this bad. >  I want to weigh my options and make the appropriate choices, in terms > of meds, or surgery, and if surgery, which one.  I have heard that the > long term relapse rate is quite high with the lap fundoplications, and > the complications such as dysphagia, difficulty belching, vomiting, > etc., scare me a bit.  I like the idea of the Stretta procedure, but I > guess it is too new to know if it will work long term (like for the > rest of my life).  Do you have any thoughts on this?  Can a Stretta > procedure be done more than once if needed? > Last endoscopy, i was diagnosed with erosive esophagus (just 1 ulcer, > I believe).  No hiatus hernia at that time (1.5 years ago).  I was on > 30mg of prevacid since then, until it stopped working earlier this > summer.  I am trying aciphex 20mg right now, but I can’t tell if it is > helping any better yet.  It just seems surprising to me that I could > still have symptoms, while on prevacid 30mg, which is pretty strong, > right? > I will find out more results in a little over a week when I have > another endoscopy done. > Are there any chances that being on a moderate/high dose of PPIs can > allow problems such as yeast esophagitis, or something of that nature > to happen in an immuno-competant person?  I feel like I am digging > with a question like that, but this came on very suddenly, and has > been very persistant for a couple months. > At 25, with a history of erosive esophagitis , the chances that PPI’s will > control your GERD for the rest of your life are negligible, even with > lifestyle modifications. Long term use of PPI’s will result in increasing > polyp formation in your stomach due to the trophic changes of unopposed > gastrin, but there is no evidence to support the assertion that it will > increase your risk of gastric cancer. > Stretta is new. It’s specific long-term effect isn’t known. However, the > long term effects of radiofrequency energy on human tissue are known. Once > collagen is deposited in the LES, and the afferent nerves are ablated, the > science of the issue would lead one to believe that the effects are > permanent. There are no long term studies to prove this, however. Yes, > Stretta can be done more than once. > Lap fundoplication is a good operation. The recurrence rate is 6-10% at 5 > years in competent hands, the specific recurrence rate is surgeon-dependant. > Dysphagia tends to be a temporary phenomenon, about 2-6 weeks and depends > very much on the pre-operative motility of the esophagus. The decreased > ability to belch can be problematic, but tends to decrease with time as the > patient learns to not swallow air (now that he doesn’t need to do that to > clear acid from the esophagus). IME, most patients find that to be an > acceptable trade-off compared to a lifetime of poorly-controlled, or > uncontrolled, GERD. > HMc

Response:

> Hello again.  I just had my endoscopy today.  They said things looked > "normal", which sounds like good news to me.  They gave me 4 pictures > that they said we would discuss at my follow-up appointment (2 weeks > from now).  I don’t know what each picture is of.  Just for fun, are > there any gastroenterologists out there that could respond telling me > exactly what I am looking at in each picture?  I posted them at: > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/Pictures/marksinners_ed.jpg

#1 is the gastroesophageal junction from above, #2 is the distal stomach (antrum) and pylorus, #3 is a retroflexed view of the GE junction from underneath, #4 is the upper part of the stomach. I agree, they all look normal. HMc

Response:

Thanks for the information.  I am very pleased that things look normal.  I didn’t walk away with concrete answers as to what is causing my symptoms, but at least I know now that there is no active damage or anything like that causing the problem. In picture #1, the LES looks like it is open a little.  Is that normal?  Also, it looks to me like my esophagus is very wide at the bottom.  Is this just my perception? Next is the pH test to determine how things are functioning.  Fun, fun… -mark – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hello again.  I just had my endoscopy today.  They said things looked > "normal", which sounds like good news to me.  They gave me 4 pictures > that they said we would discuss at my follow-up appointment (2 weeks > from now).  I don’t know what each picture is of.  Just for fun, are > there any gastroenterologists out there that could respond telling me > exactly what I am looking at in each picture?  I posted them at: > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/Pictures/marksinners_ed.jpg > #1 is the gastroesophageal junction from above, #2 is the distal stomach > (antrum) and pylorus, #3 is a retroflexed view of the GE junction from > underneath, #4 is the upper part of the stomach. > I agree, they all look normal. > HMc

Response:

> Thanks for the information.  I am very pleased that things look > normal.  I didn’t walk away with concrete answers as to what is > causing my symptoms, but at least I know now that there is no active > damage or anything like that causing the problem. > In picture #1, the LES looks like it is open a little.  Is that > normal?  Also, it looks to me like my esophagus is very wide at the > bottom.  Is this just my perception? > Next is the pH test to determine how things are functioning.  Fun, > fun…

Nah, the LES looks normal. However, during the course of an EGD, it will relax and contract, so a single snapshot doesn’t necessarily convey the true overall state of the LES. I assume that the endoscopist took it as a representative picture, knowing he only had 4 shots that he could take on the Mavigraph on each sheet. HMc

Response:

Well, its been a while since I updated this thread, but I have some testing progress today.  I had the esophageal manometry this morning, immediately followed by the insertion of the pH tube.  I must say, this test is very unpleasant, but I do like that I can see the readout right on the display.  I have had heartburn off and on all day, and typically when I check the pH, while feeling heartburn, it read, .8 – 2 or so.  About half of the time the upper pH sensor reading is also near the same (.8 – 2).  Looks to me like the reflux is significant. Of course I’ll get the real results tommorrow when they transfer the data from the digitrapper.  Hope to also get the manometry results tomorrow… -mark – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Thanks for the information.  I am very pleased that things look > normal.  I didn’t walk away with concrete answers as to what is > causing my symptoms, but at least I know now that there is no active > damage or anything like that causing the problem. > In picture #1, the LES looks like it is open a little.  Is that > normal?  Also, it looks to me like my esophagus is very wide at the > bottom.  Is this just my perception? > Next is the pH test to determine how things are functioning.  Fun, > fun… > Nah, the LES looks normal. However, during the course of an EGD, it will > relax and contract, so a single snapshot doesn’t necessarily convey the true > overall state of the LES. I assume that the endoscopist took it as a > representative picture, knowing he only had 4 shots that he could take on > the Mavigraph on each sheet. > HMc

Response:

> Well, its been a while since I updated this thread, but I have some > testing progress today.  I had the esophageal manometry this morning, > immediately followed by the insertion of the pH tube.  I must say, > this test is very unpleasant, but I do like that I can see the readout > right on the display.  I have had heartburn off and on all day, and > typically when I check the pH, while feeling heartburn, it read, .8 – > 2 or so.  About half of the time the upper pH sensor reading is also > near the same (.8 – 2).  Looks to me like the reflux is significant. > Of course I’ll get the real results tommorrow when they transfer the > data from the digitrapper.  Hope to also get the manometry results > tomorrow… > -mark

Yes, it does indeed sound like severe GERD. However, you have a history of erosive esophagitis, IIRC, so that severe GERD diagnosis has already been made. How did the manometry turn out. I’ll bet you have decreased motility and a low resting LES pressure. Keep us posted on your progress. I am interested to see what your doctor does with the diagnosis, and how well his/her proposed treatment works for you. HMc

Response:

So glad the pH test is over.  I have posted the results of manometry page, by page at: http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page1.jpg http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page2.jpg http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page3.jpg http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page4.jpg and the pH test at: http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page5.jpg http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page6.jpg My reflux was really bad during the day of the test, which I guess is good for testing purposes?  Sounds like the LES is the prime cause, by looking at the results.  I have a followup with my doc on Oct 2nd to discuss the results and future treatment.  In the meantime, What’s the diagnosis, Doc? -mark – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Well, its been a while since I updated this thread, but I have some > testing progress today.  I had the esophageal manometry this morning, > immediately followed by the insertion of the pH tube.  I must say, > this test is very unpleasant, but I do like that I can see the readout > right on the display.  I have had heartburn off and on all day, and > typically when I check the pH, while feeling heartburn, it read, .8 – > 2 or so.  About half of the time the upper pH sensor reading is also > near the same (.8 – 2).  Looks to me like the reflux is significant. > Of course I’ll get the real results tommorrow when they transfer the > data from the digitrapper.  Hope to also get the manometry results > tomorrow… > -mark > Yes, it does indeed sound like severe GERD. However, you have a history of > erosive esophagitis, IIRC, so that severe GERD diagnosis has already been > made. How did the manometry turn out. I’ll bet you have decreased motility > and a low resting LES pressure. > Keep us posted on your progress. I am interested to see what your doctor > does with the diagnosis, and how well his/her proposed treatment works for > you. > HMc

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> So glad the pH test is over.  I have posted the results of manometry > page, by page at: > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page1.jpg > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page2.jpg > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page3.jpg > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page4.jpg > and the pH test at: > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page5.jpg > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page6.jpg > My reflux was really bad during the day of the test, which I guess is > good for testing purposes?  Sounds like the LES is the prime cause, by > looking at the results.  I have a followup with my doc on Oct 2nd to > discuss the results and future treatment.  In the meantime, What’s the > diagnosis, Doc? > -mark

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > Well, its been a while since I updated this thread, but I have some > > testing progress today.  I had the esophageal manometry this morning, > > immediately followed by the insertion of the pH tube.  I must say, > > this test is very unpleasant, but I do like that I can see the readout > > right on the display.  I have had heartburn off and on all day, and > > typically when I check the pH, while feeling heartburn, it read, .8 – > > 2 or so.  About half of the time the upper pH sensor reading is also > > near the same (.8 – 2).  Looks to me like the reflux is significant. > > Of course I’ll get the real results tommorrow when they transfer the > > data from the digitrapper.  Hope to also get the manometry results > > tomorrow… > > -mark > Yes, it does indeed sound like severe GERD. However, you have a history of > erosive esophagitis, IIRC, so that severe GERD diagnosis has already been > made. How did the manometry turn out. I’ll bet you have decreased motility > and a low resting LES pressure. > Keep us posted on your progress. I am interested to see what your doctor > does with the diagnosis, and how well his/her proposed treatment works for > you. > HMc

OK, here’s the way I see it. Your esophagus functions OK – body peristalsis is satisfactory. Your lower esophageal sphincter functions OK – relaxes appropriately and has satisfactory residual pressure after wet swallows. The resting LES pressure is low indicating some laxity. Your esophagus is actually in pretty good shape – much better than I would have guessed. However, your pH test (which demonstrates really severe GERD, BTW) shows that most of your reflux occurs while upright, and after meals. There is very little reflux while supine. This indicates to me that your GERD is far more related to transient inappropriate LES relaxation than it is to low resting pressure, although both factors are playing a role. This, in conjunction with the relatively low resting pressure, your age, the severity of your GERD, and your history of erosive esophagitis, indicates that medical or lifestyle management is HIGHLY unlikely to control your symptoms or prevent damage / Barrett’s to your esophagus. I perceive that a laparoscopic gastric fundoplication is your only realistic option. HMc

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> So glad the pH test is over.  I have posted the results of manometry > page, by page at: > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page1.jpg > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page2.jpg > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page3.jpg > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page4.jpg > and the pH test at: > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page5.jpg > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page6.jpg > My reflux was really bad during the day of the test, which I guess is > good for testing purposes?  Sounds like the LES is the prime cause, by > looking at the results.  I have a followup with my doc on Oct 2nd to > discuss the results and future treatment.  In the meantime, What’s the > diagnosis, Doc? > -mark > > > Well, its been a while since I updated this thread, but I have some > > > testing progress today.  I had the esophageal manometry this morning, > > > immediately followed by the insertion of the pH tube.  I must say, > > > this test is very unpleasant, but I do like that I can see the readout > > > right on the display.  I have had heartburn off and on all day, and > > > typically when I check the pH, while feeling heartburn, it read, .8 – > > > 2 or so.  About half of the time the upper pH sensor reading is also > > > near the same (.8 – 2).  Looks to me like the reflux is significant. > > > Of course I’ll get the real results tommorrow when they transfer the > > > data from the digitrapper.  Hope to also get the manometry results > > > tomorrow… > > > -mark > > Yes, it does indeed sound like severe GERD. However, you have a history >  of > > erosive esophagitis, IIRC, so that severe GERD diagnosis has already >  been > > made. How did the manometry turn out. I’ll bet you have decreased >  motility > > and a low resting LES pressure. > > Keep us posted on your progress. I am interested to see what your doctor > > does with the diagnosis, and how well his/her proposed treatment works >  for > > you. > > HMc > OK, here’s the way I see it. > Your esophagus functions OK – body peristalsis is satisfactory. > Your lower esophageal sphincter functions OK – relaxes appropriately and has > satisfactory residual pressure after wet swallows. The resting LES pressure > is low indicating some laxity. Your esophagus is actually in pretty good > shape – much better than I would have guessed. > However, your pH test (which demonstrates really severe GERD, BTW) shows > that most of your reflux occurs while upright, and after meals. There is > very little reflux while supine. This indicates to me that your GERD is far > more related to transient inappropriate LES relaxation than it is to low > resting pressure, although both factors are playing a role. This, in > conjunction with the relatively low resting pressure, your age, the severity > of your GERD, and your history of erosive esophagitis, indicates that > medical or lifestyle management is HIGHLY unlikely to control your symptoms > or prevent damage / Barrett’s to your esophagus. I perceive that a > laparoscopic gastric fundoplication is your only realistic option. > HMc

Thanks for the evaluation.  I don’t suppose I am a candidate for the Stretta procedure?  The laparoscopic gastric fundoplication worries me a little because of the possible complications.  I don’t know…maybe in my case it would be very straight forward, and unlikely to have complications, but it is definitely a little scary to me.  Also, I have heard other doctors say that it is unlikely for it to last long term (I’m talking 10 years +, or for a lifetime…).  Do you have an opinion about that?  Thanks again for taking time to give me advice through this process… -mark

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > So glad the pH test is over.  I have posted the results of manometry > > page, by page at: > > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page1.jpg > > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page2.jpg > > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page3.jpg > > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page4.jpg > > and the pH test at: > > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page5.jpg > > http://members.verizon.net/~vze23dzw/pictures/reflux/page6.jpg > > My reflux was really bad during the day of the test, which I guess is > > good for testing purposes?  Sounds like the LES is the prime cause, by > > looking at the results.  I have a followup with my doc on Oct 2nd to > > discuss the results and future treatment.  In the meantime, What’s the > > diagnosis, Doc? > > -mark > > > > Well, its been a while since I updated this thread, but I have some > > > > testing progress today.  I had the esophageal manometry this morning, > > > > immediately followed by the insertion of the pH tube.  I must say, > > > > this test is very unpleasant, but I do like that I can see the readout > > > > right on the display.  I have had heartburn off and on all day, and > > > > typically when I check the pH, while feeling heartburn, it read, .8 – > > > > 2 or so.  About half of the time the upper pH sensor reading is also > > > > near the same (.8 – 2).  Looks to me like the reflux is significant. > > > > Of course I’ll get the real results tommorrow when they transfer the > > > > data from the digitrapper.  Hope to also get the manometry results > > > > tomorrow… > > > > -mark > > > Yes, it does indeed sound like severe GERD. However, you have a history >  of > > > erosive esophagitis, IIRC, so that severe GERD diagnosis has already >  been > > > made. How did the manometry turn out. I’ll bet you have decreased >  motility > > > and a low resting LES pressure. > > > Keep us posted on your progress. I am interested to see what your doctor > > > does with the diagnosis, and how well his/her proposed treatment works >  for > > > you. > > > HMc > OK, here’s the way I see it. > Your esophagus functions OK – body peristalsis is satisfactory. > Your lower esophageal sphincter functions OK – relaxes appropriately and has > satisfactory residual pressure after wet swallows. The resting LES pressure > is low indicating some laxity. Your esophagus is actually in pretty good > shape – much better than I would have guessed. > However, your pH test (which demonstrates really severe GERD, BTW) shows > that most of your reflux occurs while upright, and after meals. There is > very little reflux while supine. This indicates to me that your GERD is far > more related to transient inappropriate LES relaxation than it is to low > resting pressure, although both factors are playing a role. This, in > conjunction with the relatively low resting pressure, your age, the severity > of your GERD, and your history of erosive esophagitis, indicates that > medical or lifestyle management is HIGHLY unlikely to control your symptoms > or prevent damage / Barrett’s to your esophagus. I perceive that a > laparoscopic gastric fundoplication is your only realistic option. > HMc > Thanks for the evaluation.  I don’t suppose I am a candidate for the > Stretta procedure?  The laparoscopic gastric fundoplication worries me > a little because of the possible complications.  I don’t know…maybe > in my case it would be very straight forward, and unlikely to have > complications, but it is definitely a little scary to me.  Also, I > have heard other doctors say that it is unlikely for it to last long > term (I’m talking 10 years +, or for a lifetime…).  Do you have an > opinion about that?  Thanks again for taking time to give me advice > through this process…

If I recall your situation, you would be a candidate for Stretta and that may be a good option for you. Very little downside to that procedure, except for the fact that it may take up to a year for the effects to fully manifest themselves. HMc

Response:

Categories: Asthma Cure

Want to learn more? Find for more information about atkins diet what you can eat at our partner site AllergiesAsthmaHelp.com

Question:

I was talking to my mother the other day. She’s in her mid-80’s, as bright as a button, very active but wanted to lose a few pounds in weight and was asking about Atkins (I suggested it wasn’t for her). During our discussion I said I didn’t understand how, when on a conventional, balanced diet, calorie intake in excess of what you burn off makes you gain weight, but not if you’re on Atkins, apparently, where you can eat as much fat and protein as you like, or so the popular as-seen-on-TV (and my) understanding goes. She said that if you don’t eat carbohydrate, you don’t absorb the fat, and it goes straight through, and that she’d been taught this as a student nurse in the late 1930’s. I was surprised and interested. Surprised, because I’d not come across this before (although I’ve never made a great effort to read widely on Atkins, so it may not be surprising to others), and interested because it would go some way to explaining why calorie intake on Atkins doesn’t seem to matter, and why people on Atkins generally report good cholesterol values. I have a number of questions. First, is my assumption correct that calorie intake on Atkins does’t matter? Second, is the explanation that fats go straight through when on a low carb diet, well known by those who know about these things or is it no longer accepted? If the answer to the first question is ‘yes’, and to the second, that it’s no longer accepted, then is there another explanation for why calories don’t matter on Atkins? — Chris E-mail: christopher[dot]hogg[at]virgin[dot]net

Response:

Chris I believe that a well-balanced diet with a little-less food , and a little excercise is the best route . Tim Kettring – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I was talking to my mother the other day. She’s in her mid-80’s, as > bright as a button, very active but wanted to lose a few pounds in > weight and was asking about Atkins (I suggested it wasn’t for her). > During our discussion I said I didn’t understand how, when on a > conventional, balanced diet, calorie intake in excess of what you burn > off makes you gain weight, but not if you’re on Atkins, apparently, > where you can eat as much fat and protein as you like, or so the > popular as-seen-on-TV (and my) understanding goes. She said that if > you don’t eat carbohydrate, you don’t absorb the fat, and it goes > straight through, and that she’d been taught this as a student nurse > in the late 1930’s. > I was surprised and interested. Surprised, because I’d not come across > this before (although I’ve never made a great effort to read widely on > Atkins, so it may not be surprising to others), and interested because > it would go some way to explaining why calorie intake on Atkins > doesn’t seem to matter, and why people on Atkins generally report good > cholesterol values. > I have a number of questions. First, is my assumption correct that > calorie intake on Atkins does’t matter? Second, is the explanation > that fats go straight through when on a low carb diet, well known by > those who know about these things or is it no longer accepted? If the > answer to the first question is ‘yes’, and to the second, that it’s no > longer accepted, then is there another explanation for why calories > don’t matter on Atkins?

Response:

Chris, The mechanism by which a low carb diet works seems to be this: by lowering your insulin levels you make it much harder for the body to store fat. My own experience after almost 5 years of low carbing is that it was almost impossible to gain weight while I low carbed, but that once I went back to a so called "balanced" diet, I packed on weight  very quickly even when I ate at a calorie level lower than what I’d been eating during 3 years of low carbing and maintaining a 20 lb weight loss. However,  I also found that while I did not gain weight while eating all I wanted while keeping my carbs at around 40 gms a day, I could NOT lose weight beyond an initial 20 lb loss without cutting calories AND keeping my protein to a moderate level–about 14 ounces of protein-containing food a day. Eating more protein than the body needs will raise insulin too and defeat the mechanism of the diet. I learned this after having a non-fasting insulin test that revealed very high insulin levels after a completely low carb meal. Finally, for someone in their mid-80s, a bit of excess weight seems to actually be healthy. Heavier people in that age group live longer than thin ones.  So crash dieting in your 80s is not a great idea. Plus, from what I’ve seen of people in their 90s, in that decade the senses deteriorate very swiftly and it may no longer be possible to enjoy the taste of food. So my own thought are that a healthy person in their 80s would be best off celebrating the fact they can still get pleasure from eating, while perhaps simply moderating their diet downwards only a little bit. Low carbing is a very extreme solution most of us use to control severe metabolic problems. I do not personally think it is a good idea for someone who has reached their 80s in good health (and this is the advice I gave my own mother 5 years ago when she was 82 and impressed by my weight loss. She’s 87 now, in excellent health except for asthma and eats anything she wants. She’s about 25 lbs "overweight" but all her slim friends who watched their weight so carefully have been dead for a decade.) — Jenny 168.5/138.5  30 lbs lost by 8/2/03! Low Carb 9/1998 – 8/2001 and 11/10/02 – Now http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean How to calculate your need for protein * How much people really lose each month *  Water Weight Gain & Loss * The "Two Gram Cure" for Hunger Cravings * Characteristics of Successful Dieters * Indispensible Low Carb Treats * Should You Count that Low Impact Carb? * Curing Ketobreath * Exercise Starting from Zero *  NEW! Do Starch Blockers Work?

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I was talking to my mother the other day. She’s in her mid-80’s, as > bright as a button, very active but wanted to lose a few pounds in > weight and was asking about Atkins (I suggested it wasn’t for her). > During our discussion I said I didn’t understand how, when on a > conventional, balanced diet, calorie intake in excess of what you burn > off makes you gain weight, but not if you’re on Atkins, apparently, > where you can eat as much fat and protein as you like, or so the > popular as-seen-on-TV (and my) understanding goes. She said that if > you don’t eat carbohydrate, you don’t absorb the fat, and it goes > straight through, and that she’d been taught this as a student nurse > in the late 1930’s. > I was surprised and interested. Surprised, because I’d not come across > this before (although I’ve never made a great effort to read widely on > Atkins, so it may not be surprising to others), and interested because > it would go some way to explaining why calorie intake on Atkins > doesn’t seem to matter, and why people on Atkins generally report good > cholesterol values. > I have a number of questions. First, is my assumption correct that > calorie intake on Atkins does’t matter? Second, is the explanation > that fats go straight through when on a low carb diet, well known by > those who know about these things or is it no longer accepted? If the > answer to the first question is ‘yes’, and to the second, that it’s no > longer accepted, then is there another explanation for why calories > don’t matter on Atkins? > — > Chris > E-mail: christopher[dot]hogg[at]virgin[dot]net

Response:

About 4 months ago I started low carbing, but in all my reading, I have yet to find any reference to the fat not being absorbed due to reductions in carb intake.  The reason Atkins works/doesn’t work will be debated for several years to come. It is a shame that all the positive studies are coming out after his death. I personally feel so much better, I will never go back to lowfat/low calorie. However, I realize low carbing isn’t for everyone. Atkins did come to believe that calories did matter. If you have read his first book, he states that his diet isn’t a licence to overeat. My own observations are that you actually eat less calories because you aren’t hungry when you get enough fat and protein. Several sources I have read indicated that people have internal regulators for proteins and fats- they won’t overeat proteins and fats, only carbs. I have no idea if this is scientific fact. Other theories include the one that eating carbs results in a quick rise in blood sugar but  the resulting fall causes excess hunger. Then there is the fact that fat takes more calories to convert so you are burning more calories eating harder to digest foods. If you are overeating due to emotional factors, I wonder if the diet would help. Some claim they feel more emotionally stable on it, so perhaps that could explain it (there are people who feel worse too). There are other factors proposed by low carbers.  Dr Swartzbein writes in her books that in eating enough fat and protein, you are repairing your metabolism which in now in a state of insulin resistance. In her view, when you are insulin resistant, you are no longer converting food to energy, but to fat. She runs a clinic for Type II patients in California and is a big proponent of low carbing, although she doesn’t support extremely low carbing. I hope this helps. The people who really know are at http://forum.lowcarber.org/forumdisplay.php?f=97

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I was talking to my mother the other day. She’s in her mid-80’s, as > bright as a button, very active but wanted to lose a few pounds in > weight and was asking about Atkins (I suggested it wasn’t for her). > During our discussion I said I didn’t understand how, when on a > conventional, balanced diet, calorie intake in excess of what you burn > off makes you gain weight, but not if you’re on Atkins, apparently, > where you can eat as much fat and protein as you like, or so the > popular as-seen-on-TV (and my) understanding goes. She said that if > you don’t eat carbohydrate, you don’t absorb the fat, and it goes > straight through, and that she’d been taught this as a student nurse > in the late 1930’s. > I was surprised and interested. Surprised, because I’d not come across > this before (although I’ve never made a great effort to read widely on > Atkins, so it may not be surprising to others), and interested because > it would go some way to explaining why calorie intake on Atkins > doesn’t seem to matter, and why people on Atkins generally report good > cholesterol values. > I have a number of questions. First, is my assumption correct that > calorie intake on Atkins does’t matter? Second, is the explanation > that fats go straight through when on a low carb diet, well known by > those who know about these things or is it no longer accepted? If the > answer to the first question is ‘yes’, and to the second, that it’s no > longer accepted, then is there another explanation for why calories > don’t matter on Atkins? > — > Chris > E-mail: christopher[dot]hogg[at]virgin[dot]net

Response:

Chris, This is long, but the basic answer as I know it is the body uses dietary protein and fat for other maintenance activities.  It is primarily carbohydrates that the body uses for energy.  Carbohydrates are converted and used for energy or stored as body fat.  Excess, good fats are eliminated from the body.  The Atkins diet uses this principle but is not alone.  There are several other diets that use this principle too (The Schwarzbein Principle, The Zone, Sugar Busters, …).  They all stress exercise and a balanced, healthy diet.  Fast weight loss is part of the yoyo diets that don’t work and are physically harmful. I think there is a big misunderstanding by the general public on what calories are.  Rather than have everyone go to medical school or become a dietitian, the medical community came up with an easier way for the general public to count food.  The calorie method was a quick and available measurement that everyone could use.  It has it’s disadvantages. First you have to understand what a calorie is.  A calorie is defined as the amount of energy required to raise one gram of water one degree Celsius. They use heat to burn or oxidize any substance to calculate the calories. This is applied to all substances including food.  There are calories in wood, sawdust, gasoline, wheat, … all kinds of substances. What mechanism in the body uses the calories in food the way the calories were calculated?  Is there a little flame in your body that gets bigger as you exercise more and burns off the calories?  When people say "burn calories" for the body, burn has a different meaning than for the method the calories were originally calculated. Food is complex.  Chicken, as an example, is made up of protein, fat, carbohydrates, and various other minerals.  When calories for chicken are computed, all the chemical bonds are broken down to calculate what energy is released.  Your body doesn’t break all these chemical bonds.  It also uses the dietary protein to build muscle, hair, skin, etc.  The body uses the dietary fat to build cell membranes, hormones, …  It is the converted carbohydrates that are used for energy or stored as body fat.  The carbohydrates in chicken contribute to only a fraction of the calorie count for chicken. I don’t mean to hold a biology class here.  MDs have had a sampling of all types of medical training.  Those MDs specializing in endocrinology and metabolism receive further, in-depth training in those areas.  Dr. Diana Schwarzbein’s book "The Schwarzbein Principle" is a very good place to start to learn about becoming healthy.  There are patient studies through out the book that help explain biology for the layman.  Her first book is the most readable for me.  She has updated her Web site, http://www.schwarzbeinprinciple.com/, to include lots of information.  I have bought only her first book and none of the other items she is selling. That book helped me to lose weight, become healthier, and come off my medication for type 2 diabetes. Bob

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I was talking to my mother the other day. She’s in her mid-80’s, as > bright as a button, very active but wanted to lose a few pounds in > weight and was asking about Atkins (I suggested it wasn’t for her). > During our discussion I said I didn’t understand how, when on a > conventional, balanced diet, calorie intake in excess of what you burn > off makes you gain weight, but not if you’re on Atkins, apparently, > where you can eat as much fat and protein as you like, or so the > popular as-seen-on-TV (and my) understanding goes. She said that if > you don’t eat carbohydrate, you don’t absorb the fat, and it goes > straight through, and that she’d been taught this as a student nurse > in the late 1930’s. > I was surprised and interested. Surprised, because I’d not come across > this before (although I’ve never made a great effort to read widely on > Atkins, so it may not be surprising to others), and interested because > it would go some way to explaining why calorie intake on Atkins > doesn’t seem to matter, and why people on Atkins generally report good > cholesterol values. > I have a number of questions. First, is my assumption correct that > calorie intake on Atkins does’t matter? Second, is the explanation > that fats go straight through when on a low carb diet, well known by > those who know about these things or is it no longer accepted? If the > answer to the first question is ‘yes’, and to the second, that it’s no > longer accepted, then is there another explanation for why calories > don’t matter on Atkins? > — > Chris > E-mail: christopher[dot]hogg[at]virgin[dot]net

Response:

>… >I have a number of questions. First, is my assumption correct that >calorie intake on Atkins does’t matter? Second, is the explanation >that fats go straight through when on a low carb diet, well known by >those who know about these things or is it no longer accepted? If the >answer to the first question is ‘yes’, and to the second, that it’s no >longer accepted, then is there another explanation for why calories >don’t matter on Atkins?

There’s quite a lot of information, a good deal of which seems to be quite authoritative, on the web, and a Google search on "fat metabolism" finds it. A precis of what I’ve seen is that the body can and does change ingested fat and protein into glucose. I’ve never seen any suggestion that fat passes through unchanged in the absence if ingested carbohydrates. Whether that’s because the idea is no longer accepted orthodoxy, or because I simply haven’t found it, I don’t know. Pete Barrett

Response:

> I have a number of questions. First, is my assumption correct that > calorie intake on Atkins does’t matter?

Nope. > Second, is the explanation > that fats go straight through when on a low carb diet, well known by > those who know about these things or is it no longer accepted?

Dunno if it’s accepted, but it isn’t accurate. > If the > answer to the first question is ‘yes’, and to the second, that it’s no > longer accepted, then is there another explanation for why calories > don’t matter on Atkins?

Calories do matter on Atkins, it’s just that you don’t need to count them.  ;-)  Fat will make one feel full much faster than carbs will, so if you switch most of your proportional intake to fats from carbs you will fill up faster, eat less, and be less hungry.  So you’re eating fewer calories but doing it by focussing on minimizing carbs and maximizing fat.   Priscilla — Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.   (thanks be to topfive.com)

Response:

>. . .(snip). . . I said I didn’t understand how, when on a >conventional, balanced diet, calorie intake in excess of what you burn >off makes you gain weight, but not if you’re on Atkins, apparently, >where you can eat as much fat and protein as you like, or so the >popular as-seen-on-TV (and my) understanding goes. . . .(snip). . . >I have a number of questions. First, is my assumption correct that >calorie intake on Atkins does’t matter? . . .(snip). . . >– >Chris

   I once saw an article on one of the authoritative sites for medical reports by research doctors to the effect that when they studied patients on Atkins, they found that the patients voluntarily and mostly unconsciously cut total calories by 15 – 25%.  Atkins tends to produce satiation and allows one to push away from the table more easily. There’s probably a bit more to it than that.  If one cuts calories too much, the metabolism slows to prevent starvation [sigh!] and thus hinders weight loss.   I’m not certain if that happens to Atkins folks.    However, a 25% reduction in calorie intake will do a lot for weight loss. The folks I know who made a success of Atkins reported great initial results, then a slow-down as they approached non-obesity.   They reported that they had to watch the calories (mostly watch the fat) more and more carefully as they came closer and closer to their goal weights.   They did not, and now on maintenance, do not eat fat "without limit". Regards   Old Al

Response:

Al, I spent almost three years on a very low carb "maintenance" diet and did not have to watch calories at all. This was back in the old days when we low carbers slugged down bacon, cream, cheese, and pork rinds with wild abandon. I did not gain any weight eating all this stuff, even though I’m short (5′ 3"). I counted carbs only (Protein Power style) and kept them religiously at 30 a day after deducting fiber. Back then I used to live on brie and big steaks. I did not gain weight. In fact, I lost 20 pounds which I kept off. This was right after a period of 2 years when I gained  35 pounds eating a whole grain health food diet and keeping my calories low. (Good old diabetes! I’m convinced that early diabetes causes weight gain, not the other way around.). For me it certainly was possible to maintain my weight eating a huge amount of fat as long as I kept my carbs very low. The problem I ran into, ironically, was that the high level of protein I was eating caused me to develope an increasing problem with low blood sugar. The protein kicked off a strong insulin response and I ended up walking around in the high 60s and 70s most of the time, feeling like death warmed over. — Jenny 168.5/138.5  30 lbs lost by 8/2/03! Low Carb 9/1998 – 8/2001 and 11/10/02 – Now http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean How to calculate your need for protein * How much people really lose each month *  Water Weight Gain & Loss * The "Two Gram Cure" for Hunger Cravings * Characteristics of Successful Dieters * Indispensible Low Carb Treats * Should You Count that Low Impact Carb? * Curing Ketobreath * Exercise Starting from Zero *  NEW! Do Starch Blockers Work?

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->. . .(snip). . . I said I didn’t understand how, when on a >conventional, balanced diet, calorie intake in excess of what you burn >off makes you gain weight, but not if you’re on Atkins, apparently, >where you can eat as much fat and protein as you like, or so the >popular as-seen-on-TV (and my) understanding goes. . . .(snip). . . >I have a number of questions. First, is my assumption correct that >calorie intake on Atkins does’t matter? . . .(snip). . . >– >Chris >    I once saw an article on one of the authoritative sites for medical > reports by research doctors to the effect that when they studied patients on > Atkins, they found that the patients voluntarily and mostly unconsciously > cut total calories by 15 – 25%.  Atkins tends to produce satiation and > allows one to push away from the table more easily. > There’s probably a bit more to it than that.  If one cuts calories too much, > the metabolism slows to prevent starvation [sigh!] and thus hinders weight > loss.   I’m not certain if that happens to Atkins folks.    However, a 25% > reduction in calorie intake will do a lot for weight loss. > The folks I know who made a success of Atkins reported great initial > results, then a slow-down as they approached non-obesity.   They reported > that they had to watch the calories (mostly watch the fat) more and more > carefully as they came closer and closer to their goal weights.   They did > not, and now on maintenance, do not eat fat "without limit". > Regards >   Old Al

Response:

Jenny, I read through your site. Since I am just starting, I was totally aware of all the new low carb info out there. Thanks for posting that. I found it very interesting. Joy

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Al, > I spent almost three years on a very low carb "maintenance" diet and did not > have to watch calories at all. This was back in the old days when we low > carbers slugged down bacon, cream, cheese, and pork rinds with wild abandon. > I did not gain any weight eating all this stuff, even though I’m short (5′ > 3"). I counted carbs only (Protein Power style) and kept them religiously at > 30 a day after deducting fiber. > Back then I used to live on brie and big steaks. I did not gain weight. In > fact, I lost 20 pounds which I kept off. This was right after a period of 2 > years when I gained  35 pounds eating a whole grain health food diet and > keeping my calories low. (Good old diabetes! I’m convinced that early > diabetes causes weight gain, not the other way around.). > For me it certainly was possible to maintain my weight eating a huge amount > of fat as long as I kept my carbs very low. > The problem I ran into, ironically, was that the high level of protein I was > eating caused me to develope an increasing problem with low blood sugar. The > protein kicked off a strong insulin response and I ended up walking around > in the high 60s and 70s most of the time, feeling like death warmed over. > — Jenny > 168.5/138.5  30 lbs lost by 8/2/03! > Low Carb 9/1998 – 8/2001 and 11/10/02 – Now > http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean > How to calculate your need for protein * How much people really lose each > month *  Water Weight Gain & Loss * The "Two Gram Cure" for Hunger Cravings > * Characteristics of Successful Dieters * Indispensible Low Carb Treats * > Should You Count that Low Impact Carb? * Curing Ketobreath * Exercise > Starting from Zero *  NEW! Do Starch Blockers Work? > >. . .(snip). . . I said I didn’t understand how, when on a > >conventional, balanced diet, calorie intake in excess of what you burn > >off makes you gain weight, but not if you’re on Atkins, apparently, > >where you can eat as much fat and protein as you like, or so the > >popular as-seen-on-TV (and my) understanding goes. . . .(snip). . . > >I have a number of questions. First, is my assumption correct that > >calorie intake on Atkins does’t matter? . . .(snip). . . > >– > >Chris >    I once saw an article on one of the authoritative sites for medical > reports by research doctors to the effect that when they studied patients > on > Atkins, they found that the patients voluntarily and mostly unconsciously > cut total calories by 15 – 25%.  Atkins tends to produce satiation and > allows one to push away from the table more easily. > There’s probably a bit more to it than that.  If one cuts calories too > much, > the metabolism slows to prevent starvation [sigh!] and thus hinders weight > loss.   I’m not certain if that happens to Atkins folks.    However, a 25% > reduction in calorie intake will do a lot for weight loss. > The folks I know who made a success of Atkins reported great initial > results, then a slow-down as they approached non-obesity.   They reported > that they had to watch the calories (mostly watch the fat) more and more > carefully as they came closer and closer to their goal weights.   They did > not, and now on maintenance, do not eat fat "without limit". > Regards >   Old Al

Response:

As someone too damm close to 80 to like it, may I suggest that a few ideas from Atkins may be enough for your mother. 1. The "elderly" (hate that term) generally don’t exercise as much as the younger.  Therefore, they don’t burn calories as well. Therefore, a few fewer calories a day will result in a slight weight loss (and true, you don’t need or want a crash diet). 2. The general Atkins rule of fewer carbs will work for your mother.  Don’t cut out the meat,butter,milk, cream or whatever protein and fat she enjoys but DO cut down on white flour, rice, macaroni, pie, cookies – in other words, sugars/carbs. Small change = good result without getting too serious about it. Nan, Type 2 since 1990 or so – or actually, since around age 60.  

Response:

You also have to remember that some older people don’t have much appetite. You have to feed them what they will actually eat, you may even have to remind them to do so. bj

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> As someone too damm close to 80 to like it, may I suggest that a few ideas from > Atkins may be enough for your mother. > 1. The "elderly" (hate that term) generally don’t exercise as much as the > younger.  Therefore, they don’t burn calories as well. > Therefore, a few fewer calories a day will result in a slight weight loss (and > true, you don’t need or want a crash diet). > 2. The general Atkins rule of fewer carbs will work for your mother. Don’t cut > out the meat,butter,milk, cream or whatever protein and fat she enjoys but DO > cut down on white flour, rice, macaroni, pie, cookies – in other words, > sugars/carbs. > Small change = good result without getting > too serious about it. > Nan, Type 2 since 1990 or so – or actually, since around age 60.

Response:

>As someone too damm close to 80 to like it, may I suggest that a few ideas from >Atkins may be enough for your mother. >1. The "elderly" (hate that term) generally don’t exercise as much as the >younger.  Therefore, they don’t burn calories as well. >Therefore, a few fewer calories a day will result in a slight weight loss (and >true, you don’t need or want a crash diet). >2. The general Atkins rule of fewer carbs will work for your mother.  Don’t cut >out the meat,butter,milk, cream or whatever protein and fat she enjoys but DO >cut down on white flour, rice, macaroni, pie, cookies – in other words, >sugars/carbs. >Small change = good result without getting >too serious about it. >Nan, Type 2 since 1990 or so – or actually, since around age 60.  

I like this idea – good common sense and incidentally, almost exactly what I said to my mother [78] last week. Pete Diagnosed 20/03/03 Type II D&E + Metformin + Gliclazide + Asprin 210lbs at Dx to 170 lbs 02/08/03 target 161.

Response:

"Pete" signed …  Diagnosed 20/03/03 Type II D&E + Metformin + Gliclazide + Asprin 210lbs at Dx to 170 lbs 02/08/03 target 161. I went from 220 to 160 in about a year.  Been at that weight for four years now.  If this "fat boy" could do it, I have no doubt you can get there also. Besides, it looks like you’re well on your way. Arnie –

Response:

>"Pete" signed … > Diagnosed 20/03/03 Type II D&E + Metformin + Gliclazide + Asprin 210lbs at >Dx to 170 lbs 02/08/03 target 161. >I went from 220 to 160 in about a year.  Been at that weight for four years >now.  If this "fat boy" could do it, I have no doubt you can get there also. >Besides, it looks like you’re well on your way. >Arnie –

Thank you for the encouragement. The target I have is just me being bloody minded. 161 lbs is exactly 1 lb over the weight I was when I turned 15 years old.  I am now 52. All my adult life some damn quack has said I need to be the weight quoted by some damn chart. The chart always says 160 lbs. I always say that I have never been that weight since 15 as if the demand of the chart is completely unreasonable. So I am going to do it. I am trying to slow the loss down and have had a little success but beleive me loosing it is not hard for me at the moment. I am eating to my BG levels and so need more meds but i am waiting for a decent time untill the last change has had a chance to saturate me.. Cheers Pete Diagnosed 20/03/03 Type II D&E + Metformin + Gliclazide + Asprin 210lbs at Dx to 170 lbs 02/08/03 target 161.

Response:

> I was talking to my mother the other day. She’s in her mid-80’s, as > bright as a button, very active but wanted to lose a few pounds in > weight and was asking about Atkins (I suggested it wasn’t for her). > During our discussion I said I didn’t understand how, when on a > conventional, balanced diet, calorie intake in excess of what you burn > off makes you gain weight, but not if you’re on Atkins, apparently, > where you can eat as much fat and protein as you like, or so the > popular as-seen-on-TV (and my) understanding goes. She said that if > you don’t eat carbohydrate, you don’t absorb the fat, and it goes > straight through, and that she’d been taught this as a student nurse > in the late 1930’s.

Like so many others, you’ve made assumptions about this diet that simply are not true.  If you exceed the amount of calories, you need, you will gain weight.  It does not matter the source.  You can NOT eat as much as you want on Atkins.  He lists specific amounts of calories, fat and protein.  Some people say the reason you lose weight on such a diet is because of the things you are no longer eating.  Namely, most carbs.  Quit eating those things and continue to eat the same amounts of fat and protein and you’ll lose weight.  The diet also gives more specifics as to what types of protein are the best to eat and what to eat sparingly or not at all. > I was surprised and interested. Surprised, because I’d not come across > this before (although I’ve never made a great effort to read widely on > Atkins, so it may not be surprising to others), and interested because > it would go some way to explaining why calorie intake on Atkins > doesn’t seem to matter, and why people on Atkins generally report good > cholesterol values.

I’ve read the book, or at least most of it.  Not because I would try it, but because my husband wanted to go on it.  And like you, he had false assumptions.  When he saw how strict it was and that he couldn’t eat fruit (at least not in the beginning phases), he didn’t do it. > I have a number of questions. First, is my assumption correct that > calorie intake on Atkins does’t matter? Second, is the explanation > that fats go straight through when on a low carb diet, well known by > those who know about these things or is it no longer accepted? If the > answer to the first question is ‘yes’, and to the second, that it’s no > longer accepted, then is there another explanation for why calories > don’t matter on Atkins?

I think all your assumptions are wrong. — Type 2 http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

> I have a number of questions. First, is my assumption correct > that calorie intake on Atkins does’t matter?

   No calories do matter…. The theory is that you don’t have to    count calories because on a lo-carb diet you eat until you are    full (note that is not stuffed). Protein and fat tend to be more    filling.  To loose weight output must exceed input. > Second, is the explanation that fats go straight through when on > a low carb diet, well known by those who know about these things > or is it no longer accepted?  If the answer to the first question is ‘yes’, > and to the second, that it’s no longer accepted, then is there another > explanation for why calories don’t matter on Atkins?

   No, the body when operating on reduced levels of carbs will use    fat for fuel. The body will also process carbs slower when there is    fat in the diet.    Calories do matter on Atkins. Wish some of the people spouting this    misconception would read his book. BJ

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I have a number of questions. First, is my assumption correct > that calorie intake on Atkins does’t matter? >    No calories do matter…. The theory is that you don’t have to >    count calories because on a lo-carb diet you eat until you are >    full (note that is not stuffed). Protein and fat tend to be more >    filling.  To loose weight output must exceed input. > Second, is the explanation that fats go straight through when on > a low carb diet, well known by those who know about these things > or is it no longer accepted?  If the answer to the first question is > ‘yes’, > and to the second, that it’s no longer accepted, then is there another > explanation for why calories don’t matter on Atkins? >    No, the body when operating on reduced levels of carbs will use >    fat for fuel. The body will also process carbs slower when there is >    fat in the diet. >    Calories do matter on Atkins. Wish some of the people spouting this >    misconception would read his book. > BJ

I wish that people who believe in Atkins should remember he was NOT diabetic, but Bernstein is. I also wish people would go to http://www.quackwatch.org where Atkins is commented on, but Bernstein is not. btw Quackwatch is maintained by a qualified MD QED — Al, Melton Mowbray, UK Control Beef Lente 1x Low-Carb http://www.diabetesincontrol.com http://www.iddtinternational.org/uk "Do, or do not. There is no try" Yoda The Empire Strikes Back

Response:

Many thanks to everyone for blowing away my misconceptions. My mother has decided just to drop the high-carb foods (bread, potatoes, etc.) to see how she gets on, much as Nan Eklund suggested. I’m happy with that and she has always eaten plenty of fruit and veggies. True Atkins would have been totally inappropriate for her for several reasons. — Chris E-mail: christopher[dot]hogg[at]virgin[dot]net

Response:

Tell your mother to pick up a copy of Sugar Busters or The New Glucose Revolution, or the South Beach Diet (which I understand is a popular "take" on The New Glucose Revolution). Cookie – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Many thanks to everyone for blowing away my misconceptions. > My mother has decided just to drop the high-carb foods (bread, > potatoes, etc.) to see how she gets on, much as Nan Eklund suggested. > I’m happy with that and she has always eaten plenty of fruit and > veggies. True Atkins would have been totally inappropriate for her for > several reasons.

Response:

Categories: General Asthma

Question:

Hi, all. My insurance company just reported me to LifeMasters as a person who has "been diagnosed with congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, asthma, or diabetes."  I feel that this is a violation of HIPAA, and I’m steamed. This insurance company hasn’t paid for the anesthesia for my husband’s surgery when he had his knee repaired in January, and they won’t talk to me about it because of HIPAA.  Then they go and turn me in to another company, because they know anyone who is getting frequent HbA1C’s must be diabetic. It’s no misunderstanding.  The envelope was from LifeMasters in California, but the letterhead was Capital BlueCross.  I am reporting them to the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner. Maggie N.  :( T2 since 8/31/02

Response:

Who or what is LifeMasters and what are they trying to tell you/get you to do/sell you/etc.? bj

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi, all. > My insurance company just reported me to LifeMasters as a person who has > "been diagnosed with congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, > asthma, or diabetes."  I feel that this is a violation of HIPAA, and I’m > steamed. > This insurance company hasn’t paid for the anesthesia for my husband’s > surgery when he had his knee repaired in January, and they won’t talk to > me about it because of HIPAA.  Then they go and turn me in to another > company, because they know anyone who is getting frequent HbA1C’s must > be diabetic. > It’s no misunderstanding.  The envelope was from LifeMasters in > California, but the letterhead was Capital BlueCross.  I am reporting > them to the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner. > Maggie N.  :( > T2 since 8/31/02

Response:

> Who or what is LifeMasters and what are they trying to tell you/get you to > do/sell you/etc.? > bj

I believe my health insurance co sent me the mail rather than LifeMasters. I did not believe that I needed their services. Their website link follows. http://www.lifemasters.com/ Frank

Response:

Yes you MAY have a HIPAA violation, your insurance company may share information with them only if you agreed, did you read the HIPAA disclosure you signed, are they mentioned? are referrals to outside affiliates mentioned is LifeMasters affiliated? there are many questions here, by all means file your complaint where you live and where they are based but don’t be shocked if it is another law that no-one wants to enforce unless there is something in it for them.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi, all. > My insurance company just reported me to LifeMasters as a person who has > "been diagnosed with congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, > asthma, or diabetes."  I feel that this is a violation of HIPAA, and I’m > steamed. > This insurance company hasn’t paid for the anesthesia for my husband’s > surgery when he had his knee repaired in January, and they won’t talk to > me about it because of HIPAA.  Then they go and turn me in to another > company, because they know anyone who is getting frequent HbA1C’s must > be diabetic. > It’s no misunderstanding.  The envelope was from LifeMasters in > California, but the letterhead was Capital BlueCross.  I am reporting > them to the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner. > Maggie N.  :( > T2 since 8/31/02

Response:

>Who or what is LifeMasters and what are they trying to tell you/get you to >do/sell you/etc.?

Lifemasters is contracted by different insurance companies to "assist" diabetics with the intention of improving their health, thereby reducing the insurance companies’ payouts. When I turned down their "help", they continued to hound my husband by mail (and wanted our phone number so they could talk directly to him) and insisted that he personally refuse their assistance before they would back off. Needless to say, they never got through to him. I don’t think there will be a case for a HIPPA violation here because they are an agent of the insurance company to which you have contracted. Sounds to me as if you need to work with the insurance company and your creditors to resolve your claims rather than concentrate on a supposed violation. You’ll definitely stand a better chance of resolving the claims this way. Bev Remove the "SpamFree" for email, please.   Join us in the Diabetic-Talk Chatroom on UnderNet /server irc.undernet.org — /join #Diabetic-Talk More info: http://www.diabetic-talk.org/

Response:

writes: What’s HIPAA ? and whats LifeMasters?

Response:

> writes: > What’s HIPAA ? and whats LifeMasters?

I believe HIPAA stands for Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act

Response:

Categories: General Asthma

Question:

The insurance company sent me the wrong strips for the 2nd month in a row and won’t take them back. I have 8 boxes of 50 strips each, for the Freestyle meter. I’m asking $25 a box. I’m in the Austin, TX area. 512-528-8827 Dea Jarrett

Response:

>The insurance company sent me the wrong strips for the 2nd month in a >row and won’t take them back. I have 8 boxes of 50 strips each, for >the Freestyle meter. I’m asking $25 a box. I’m in the Austin, TX area. >512-528-8827 >Dea Jarrett

your co pay was 25$ per box?  dude you got ripped off, my co pay for 3 boxes of 100 strips each per month is only 15$. Mack Type 1 since 1975 http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org http://www.insulin-pumpers.org  In tribute to the United States of America and the State  of Israel, two bastions of strength in a world filled with strife and  terrorism.

Response:

And I have no co pay,  Why do I suspect this guy is looking to make some money,  Just a feeling in my stomach, Loretta — In tribute to the United States of America and the State of Israel, two bastions of strength in a world filled with strife and terrorism.

Response:

Frankly, you are right. With a Type 1 diabetic kid, a hypoglycemic "pre-diabetic" other kid, both of which are Celiac so I can’t feed them bread without making it myself (it takes longer to make than the loaf lasts they get so thrilled to eat bread) and a wife who is sometimes hypoglycemic and has an off and on kidney problem they can’t figure out…yeah, I can use every penny I can get. No offense was meant…we were hoping to help someone without insurance get strips cheaper than they can at Wal-Mart AND put some gas in the truck! On the one kid, they did take the strips back when they sent the wrong ones….this month they won’t, tho. Sorry, John

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> And I have no co pay,  Why do I suspect this guy is looking to make some > money,  Just a feeling in my stomach, > Loretta > — > In tribute to the United States of America and the State > of Israel, two bastions of strength in a world filled with strife and > terrorism.

Response:

Your shit is getting old HT. You buy strips on EBay then question the morality of it? If this guy is telling the truth, (which I suspect he is) you have absolutely no right to criticize him. You have no idea what his internet situation is. Having kids in school, it is almost a necessity to have one. Geeze I thought I was too negative all the time, until you showed up. SM – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Frankly, you are right. >With a Type 1 diabetic kid, a hypoglycemic "pre-diabetic" other kid, >both of which are Celiac so I can’t feed them bread without making it >myself (it takes longer to make than the loaf lasts they get so >thrilled to eat bread) and a wife who is sometimes hypoglycemic and >has an off and on kidney problem they can’t figure out…yeah, I can >use every penny I can get. >No offense was meant…we were hoping to help someone without >insurance get strips cheaper than they can at Wal-Mart AND put some >gas in the truck! On the one kid, they did take the strips back when >they sent the wrong ones….this month they won’t, tho. >Sorry, >John >If you can afford an internet connection then you can afford meds.  I >see guys like you all the time on EBay looking to make a buck.

I don

Categories: General Asthma

Question:

Very true – tomatoes are a very good source of nutrients, especially the home grown ones. Not only do home grown tomatoes taste much, (much, much) better that store bought ones, they are much richer in nutrients. It is wise to include both raw AND cooked tomatoes to your diet, since cooking, especially with some fats, makes lycopene more available – http://www.azcc.arizona.edu/nutrition/nutritionHighlight/ Al – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> TWO TOMATOES A DAY KEEP THE DOCTOR AWAY > The Deccan Chronicle > Thursday, December 16, 1999 > The tomato is one of the most important vegetables in > most regions of the world. About 130 years ago, tomato > was considered poisonous. It was regarded as an acidic > food and thus people suffering from gout, acidity and > rheumatism were advised not to use it. But today, the > latest studies provide information that it has > unsurpassable health-giving qualities and is essentially > an alkaline vegetable. > It is a high source of folic acid, vitamin C, > phosphorous, calcium, fibre, vitamin A (carotene) and is > low in calories. The acid taste is due to malic acid, > which is only 0.5 per cent. The end product after > digestion is also alkaline and neutralises acid compounds > of the body. Thus tomato is highly beneficial for > diseases associated with too much acid in the system. > It is also considered to be anti-mucilaginous, a > detoxifier and a cleanser. Fresh raw tomato juice is > probably one of the best and cheapest juices. It has an > alkaline reaction, is anti-cancerous and a natural > stimulant that helps kidneys wash away toxins. It is a > myth that tomatoes cause stones in the gall bladder and > urinary calculi. > Tomato as an external application is a useful cosmetic. > The pulp can be left for 30 to 40 minutes on the face and > washed with water to remove excess tan, soothe the skin, > improve the complexion and take care of pimples and > blemishes.Diabetics can benefit from eating tomatoes as > they are low in carbohydrates, high in vitamin C and help > in weight reduction. Being an equally good source of > vitamin A, it is excellent nourishment for the eyes and > skin.A fresh glass of tomato juice early in the morning > is good for asthmatics, the obese and those with lung > disorders. > Tomatoes have an anti-mucilaginous property and so help > clear congestion. It is also an effective detoxifier and > hence good for treating ailments like jaundice, morning > sickness, flatulence, constipation and urinary disorders. > In fact, it prevents the formation of urinary > calculi.Maximum health benefit can be derived by > consuming a glass of raw tomato juice in the morning or > eating two to three ripe red tomatoes before noon daily. > Juice can be combined with carrots or apples for added > taste and nutrition. > Read the complete news at: > http://www.deccanherald.com > Jai Maharaj > http://www.mantra.com/jai > Om Shanti > Panchaang for 7 Ashadh 5104, Saturday, July 5, 2003: > Shubhanu Nama Samvatsare Dakshinaya Nartana Ritau >      Mithun Mase Shukl Pakshe Manta Vasara Yuktayam > Uttaraphalguni Nakshatr Variyan Yog >      Taitil-Gar Karan Shasthi-Saptami Yam Tithau > Hindu Holocaust Museum > http://www.mantra.com/holocaust > Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy > http://www.hindu.org > http://www.hindunet.org > The truth about Islam and Muslims > http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate >      o  Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the > educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of > this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent > the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law > and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works. >      o  If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read, > considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, > current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number. >      o  Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others > are not necessarily those of the poster.

Response:

As a matter of fact, storage-ripened fruits and vegetables are quite sub-standard. Jai Maharaj http://www.mantra.com/jai Om Shanti – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Very true – tomatoes are a very good source of nutrients, especially the > home grown ones. Not only do home grown tomatoes taste much, (much, much) > better that store bought ones, they are much richer in nutrients. It is wise > to include both raw AND cooked tomatoes to your diet, since cooking, > especially with some fats, makes lycopene more available – > http://www.azcc.arizona.edu/nutrition/nutritionHighlight/ > Al > TWO TOMATOES A DAY KEEP THE DOCTOR AWAY > The Deccan Chronicle > Thursday, December 16, 1999 > The tomato is one of the most important vegetables in > most regions of the world. About 130 years ago, tomato > was considered poisonous. It was regarded as an acidic > food and thus people suffering from gout, acidity and > rheumatism were advised not to use it. But today, the > latest studies provide information that it has > unsurpassable health-giving qualities and is essentially > an alkaline vegetable. > It is a high source of folic acid, vitamin C, > phosphorous, calcium, fibre, vitamin A (carotene) and is > low in calories. The acid taste is due to malic acid, > which is only 0.5 per cent. The end product after > digestion is also alkaline and neutralises acid compounds > of the body. Thus tomato is highly beneficial for > diseases associated with too much acid in the system. > It is also considered to be anti-mucilaginous, a > detoxifier and a cleanser. Fresh raw tomato juice is > probably one of the best and cheapest juices. It has an > alkaline reaction, is anti-cancerous and a natural > stimulant that helps kidneys wash away toxins. It is a > myth that tomatoes cause stones in the gall bladder and > urinary calculi. > Tomato as an external application is a useful cosmetic. > The pulp can be left for 30 to 40 minutes on the face and > washed with water to remove excess tan, soothe the skin, > improve the complexion and take care of pimples and > blemishes.Diabetics can benefit from eating tomatoes as > they are low in carbohydrates, high in vitamin C and help > in weight reduction. Being an equally good source of > vitamin A, it is excellent nourishment for the eyes and > skin.A fresh glass of tomato juice early in the morning > is good for asthmatics, the obese and those with lung > disorders. > Tomatoes have an anti-mucilaginous property and so help > clear congestion. It is also an effective detoxifier and > hence good for treating ailments like jaundice, morning > sickness, flatulence, constipation and urinary disorders. > In fact, it prevents the formation of urinary > calculi.Maximum health benefit can be derived by > consuming a glass of raw tomato juice in the morning or > eating two to three ripe red tomatoes before noon daily. > Juice can be combined with carrots or apples for added > taste and nutrition. > Read the complete news at: > http://www.deccanherald.com > Jai Maharaj > http://www.mantra.com/jai > Om Shanti > Panchaang for 7 Ashadh 5104, Saturday, July 5, 2003: > Shubhanu Nama Samvatsare Dakshinaya Nartana Ritau >      Mithun Mase Shukl Pakshe Manta Vasara Yuktayam > Uttaraphalguni Nakshatr Variyan Yog >      Taitil-Gar Karan Shasthi-Saptami Yam Tithau > Hindu Holocaust Museum > http://www.mantra.com/holocaust > Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy > http://www.hindu.org > http://www.hindunet.org > The truth about Islam and Muslims > http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate >      o  Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the > educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of > this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent > the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law > and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works. >      o  If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read, > considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, > current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number. >      o  Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others > are not necessarily those of the poster.

Response:

TWO TOMATOES A DAY KEEP THE DOCTOR AWAY The Deccan Chronicle Thursday, December 16, 1999 The tomato is one of the most important vegetables in most regions of the world. About 130 years ago, tomato was considered poisonous. It was regarded as an acidic food and thus people suffering from gout, acidity and rheumatism were advised not to use it. But today, the latest studies provide information that it has unsurpassable health-giving qualities and is essentially an alkaline vegetable. It is a high source of folic acid, vitamin C, phosphorous, calcium, fibre, vitamin A (carotene) and is low in calories. The acid taste is due to malic acid, which is only 0.5 per cent. The end product after digestion is also alkaline and neutralises acid compounds of the body. Thus tomato is highly beneficial for diseases associated with too much acid in the system. It is also considered to be anti-mucilaginous, a detoxifier and a cleanser. Fresh raw tomato juice is probably one of the best and cheapest juices. It has an alkaline reaction, is anti-cancerous and a natural stimulant that helps kidneys wash away toxins. It is a myth that tomatoes cause stones in the gall bladder and urinary calculi. Tomato as an external application is a useful cosmetic. The pulp can be left for 30 to 40 minutes on the face and washed with water to remove excess tan, soothe the skin, improve the complexion and take care of pimples and blemishes.Diabetics can benefit from eating tomatoes as they are low in carbohydrates, high in vitamin C and help in weight reduction. Being an equally good source of vitamin A, it is excellent nourishment for the eyes and skin.A fresh glass of tomato juice early in the morning is good for asthmatics, the obese and those with lung disorders. Tomatoes have an anti-mucilaginous property and so help clear congestion. It is also an effective detoxifier and hence good for treating ailments like jaundice, morning sickness, flatulence, constipation and urinary disorders. In fact, it prevents the formation of urinary calculi.Maximum health benefit can be derived by consuming a glass of raw tomato juice in the morning or eating two to three ripe red tomatoes before noon daily. Juice can be combined with carrots or apples for added taste and nutrition. Read the complete news at: http://www.deccanherald.com Jai Maharaj http://www.mantra.com/jai Om Shanti Panchaang for 7 Ashadh 5104, Saturday, July 5, 2003: Shubhanu Nama Samvatsare Dakshinaya Nartana Ritau      Mithun Mase Shukl Pakshe Manta Vasara Yuktayam Uttaraphalguni Nakshatr Variyan Yog      Taitil-Gar Karan Shasthi-Saptami Yam Tithau Hindu Holocaust Museum http://www.mantra.com/holocaust Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy http://www.hindu.org http://www.hindunet.org The truth about Islam and Muslims http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate      o  Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.      o  If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read, considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.      o  Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are not necessarily those of the poster.

Response:

Categories: General Asthma

Question:

Atkins, Type 2 Diabetes, A1c, LDL, Blood Pressure, & Supplements 1.  I posted this message to low-carb where it was suggested alt.support.diabetes may be a better place. 2.  I’ve been lurking here for a few days and reading tons of messages but haven’t found any discussions about a situation I’m in.  Sorry about the length of this post.  Hopefully T2’s can respond to questions in points 21. & 23. below.  This post may be of interest to users that are supportive of low-carb and that are interested in detail. 3.  I’m a Type 2 diabetic since 1987, 59yrs, male, 5′10" with a reference weight of 223 when I started Atkins on 2003Jun01.   4.  I started Atkins a week after visiting my Internist (internal medicine and diabetes specialist doctor)   This was a follow-up visit from a 2002Dec05 visit when he said I needed to get my blood glucose (BG) A1c at 8.1% back under control, and to make changes to lower my LDL which was at 3.38mmol/l (132mg/dl).  My HDL was 1.06mmol/l (42mg/dl) and triglycerides (TG) were 1.44mmol/l (128mg/dl).   5.  My Internist prescribed Metformin which was previously prescribed but which I hadn’t taken since 1998Jan26.  Annual results for A1c since 1998 were always within acceptable limits, without medications. 6.  Since 1997 when I started asking for and getting all lab reports, my A1c readings have ranged from 6.0 to 7.2%, my LDL from 2.04 to 3.16 (80 to 123), HDL from .79 to 1.16 (31 to 45), and TG from 1.19 to 2.28 (106 to 203).  I had no history of high blood pressure (BP). 7.  On 2003Jan23, my General Practitioner’s (GP) lab results were A1c 6.8%, LDL 2.76 (108), HDL 1.16 (45), & TG 1.62 (144).  Although my GP said my BP was normal (130/80), he decided to prescribe an ACE inhibitor (Ramipril) because I had experienced a day of Vertigo-like symptoms when my BP went to 180/110 (one time only).  He said Ramipril had side benefits of protecting kidneys. 8.  For the 2003May27 return visit to my Internist, my weight was still 223, A1c 6.9%, LDL 3.29 (128), HDL 1.18 (46), TG 1.33 (118) & BP 142/90.  The only dietary change I made since 2002Dec was to stop eating French fries and potatoes.   My Internist said my LDL was much too high for diabetics and LDL must be reduced to less than 2.50 (98). He said that since I am diabetic, I am automatically in the high risk category for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and that my LDL must be lower than 2.50 (98) to reduce my risk of CAD.  (I found the cholesterol guidelines at http://www.postgradmed.com/issues/2002/08_02/pearlman.htm) and on many other URL’s.)   9.  My Internist requested I go on a controlled program (called the TNT program, I believe) for taking Lipitor, a Statin, for reducing my LDL below 2.50 (98).  This program would involve going on a low-fat low-cal diet, exercising, and a weight reduction program.   10.  Since Ramipril had little effect on my BP since I started taking it on 2003Apr01, he doubled the dose from 5mg to 10mg, added a diuretic, and prescribed a BP meter for me to take my own BP readings. 11.  All the changes and rationales were a complete shock to me.  My A1c, LDL, and BP readings which were previously acceptable, were no longer acceptable.  I was now going to be pumped full of prescription drugs and I was going to be put on this low-fat low-cal diet. 12.  With the basic info my Internist gave me, I Googled the net and eventually found exactly what he was trying to do.  The one aspect that disturbed me the most was that he was prescribing all these changes and drugs, without first having exhausted all natural methods for accomplishing the same end result. 13.  That’s when I started to think about Atkins and to check info at the Atkins web page on 2003May30.  It didn’t take long to understand the principles of low carb.  Also, I saw Atkins as a diet I could easily live with.  Counting carbs seemed much easier than counting calories or fat.  I saw that with Atkins I could keep on eating what I liked, except to cut sugars 100% and to minimize all carbs.   14.  I have seldom ever drank alcohol, coffee, tea, milk or juices (except for maybe 5-10 servings of each, per year)

Categories: General Asthma

Question:

> I think it’s a low percentage (as well). Given the fact that it’s extremely > difficult for most people to lose weight in case of overweight/obesity, > that 33% is very high indeed. > Somewhere else in this thread Eldritch suggested a 90% overweight (at/after > diagnosis?) which sounds more real to me.

        Yes, 90% is the figure I’ve heard, and 67% does seem low to me, but I can’t say I’m sure of the accuracy of the 90% figure.                                 E

Response:

> That’s not to say that unexplained weight loss is only caused by > diabetes.  There are other medical conditions which may do that as well. >      If diabetes is involved they your friend should be plagued by > thirst and frequent urination.  He would complain of being hungry most > of the time.  He may have noticed he’s become suddenly more nearsighted. >   And he would probably feel tired and sleepy a lot.

Unexplained weight loss and a family history of diabetes was what made me schedule a dr.’s appointment. I had ALL the symptoms you mentioned. But in retrospect, they seemed to come on rather quickly– that is, the time frame of me going from feeling ok to suspecting I had out of control diabetes took about 6 months. I’m about 30 lbs. overweight, but this weight loss (about 20 lbs. total) made my skin sag and took my muscle tone. My palms and soles were dry and felt like sandpaper. Two months into treatment, I seem to have found those 20 lbs! But I’m trying to get rid of them the right way now <g>. My glasses are working again, and I no longer have to carry around a bottle of water everywhere because I’m always thirsty. So yes, I agree with you that weight loss can be caused by a number of illnesses, but it’s the combination of that and the other symptoms that point strongly to diabetes. >Wal-Mart, Walgreens and a number of drugstores have > house brand meters that cost about $9.00 which might come with 5 or 10 > free test strips.  Test strips would cost about $42 for 100 or less if > they sell a box of 50 strips.

I got the Walgreens meter when I was first diagnosed. I thought I was getting good control until I was able to get a (free) Freestyle meter. Boy, was I humbled, and not in a good way! The Walgreens meter consistently read 20-25 points below the Freestyle. I found that the Freestyle readings correlate more closely with my lab readings; it reads all the glucose in the sample, while the Walgreens meter requires a much larger sample and yields a less specific reading. 20 points can make a difference in how I plan my meals or time my meds. I know any meter is better than no meter. But if someone strongly suspects they have diabetes, they’re going to be testing quite regularly and they might as well get the best meter their budget or insurance provider will allow, rather than opting for a cheaper meter that might not be as sensitive. YMMV, JMHO, etc. etc… kaci Type 2 dx 4/29/03 Glucovance 5/500 2x, altace 10 mg, zocor 40 mg.

Response:

>  Thanks for the good information. > My friend is under medical control and doing fine.

                I’m glad to hear that. > …then in the last two month after I had a  prostate operation. > This increased voiding quantity for a while and I  lost about 4 lbs. This > doesn’t sound like much, but it was a concern to me because what I knew > about my friend.

        It seems reasonable that the stress of the operation may have caused the weight loss. > Fortunately, the BG > remained very steady during the loss. This indicates that there was no major > change in  my diabetes condition. I’ll wait till my yearly check-up in > August to find out.

        Yes. What the meter reads is the important thing.         Good luck.                                 E

Response:

> I wonder if those figures were based on diagnosis weight.  If not, > then part of the other 33% could have lost weight after diagnosis as > that’s what most docs advise.

I think it’s a low percentage (as well). Given the fact that it’s extremely difficult for most people to lose weight in case of overweight/obesity, that 33% is very high indeed. Somewhere else in this thread Eldritch suggested a 90% overweight (at/after diagnosis?) which sounds more real to me. — CeeBee

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >Thanks for the information. I have one question: > Sometimes an undiagnosed diabetic will suddenly find himself making > very little insulin.  Without insulin, glucose gets blocked up in the > blood stream and is not delivered to the cells where it is needed.  The > cells are literally starving because they have no glucose, even though > glucose is very close.   As glucose levels mount higher and higher, the > kidneys begin filtering out the excessive amounts of blood glucose and > passing it out of the body through the urine.  So the food you eat is > literally urinated away, while your cells remain unfed. >If the glucose level mounts higher and higher, wouldn’t this show up on the >BG meter as high readings? >Fred Henzi

yes.   Mack Type 1 since 1975 http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org http://www.insulin-pumpers.org  In tribute to the United States of America and the State  of Israel, two bastions of strength in a world filled with strife and  terrorism.

Response:

> An acquaintance of mine was dx’d T2 after steadily losing weight . What is > the connection?  Till now, I thought, that all T2 are over-weight. I’m > concerned, because I’m very low weight too. I feel good though.

I was losing about a pound a day before diagnosis. Reason: peeing away 4000 calories per liter.

Response:

>>If the glucose level mounts higher and higher, wouldn’t this show up on > the >BG meter as high readings? > Yes.  But if the diabetic is undiagnosed, it’s  not likely he or she would > even have a meter.

         True.  When I wrote that, I mistakenly assumed the poster was asking about an undiagnosed friend.  Since he was asking whether this would show up on a meter, I assumed he was thinking about obtaining a meter to check.   On re-reading his post, I see his friend is already diagnosed.                                 E

Response:

 Thanks for the good information. My friend is under medical control and doing fine. I understand now better why sudden weight loss can be a sign of diabetes. I was concerned that my own diabetes changed because I lost weight lately. I am a skinny T2. I reached this stage in two phases, one three years ago after dx, and then in the last two month after I had a  prostate operation. This increased voiding quantity for a while and I  lost about 4 lbs. This doesn’t sound like much, but it was a concern to me because what I knew about my friend. I’m 140 lbs now and my height is 5-10. Fortunately, the BG remained very steady during the loss. This indicates that there was no major change in  my diabetes condition. I’ll wait till my yearly check-up in August to find out. Fred Henzi

Response:

> Not all type 2’s are overweight.  But you see that so often in the > media you tend to believe it. >From the top of my head: I once read US figures showing that from the > people with T2 67% was overweight and 46% was obese. (I guess these 46% are > included in the 67% definition). So roughly 2/3th is overweight or

obese. I wonder if those figures were based on diagnosis weight.  If not, then part of the other 33% could have lost weight after diagnosis as that’s what most docs advise.

Response:

> Thanks for the information. I have one question: > Sometimes an undiagnosed diabetic will suddenly find himself making > very little insulin.  Without insulin, glucose gets blocked up in the > blood stream and is not delivered to the cells where it is needed.  The > cells are literally starving because they have no glucose, even though > glucose is very close.   As glucose levels mount higher and higher, the > kidneys begin filtering out the excessive amounts of blood glucose and > passing it out of the body through the urine.  So the food you eat is > literally urinated away, while your cells remain unfed. > If the glucose level mounts higher and higher, wouldn’t this show up on the > BG meter as high readings?

Yes.  But if the diabetic is undiagnosed, it’s  not likely he or she would even have a meter. — Type 2 http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

It seems most people  start to dump glucose in the urine at around 150.  Years ago I sent a fellow to the doctor because of frequent bathroom trips.  He had diabetes. In cases like mine, when I run low on insulin my body senses starvation and dumps out more glucose.  Very high blood sugars. I have no natural insulin.  People like me use long acting insulin to prevent this.  I need about 0.7 units per hour to prevent this. The early stages of diabetes does not cause ’starvation" but the excess food input runs the blood sugars up since there is not enough insulin to handle the glucose you from you food.. Type 1’s where the onset is acute,  the body will start to use the fat and protein to survive. This will cause rapid weight loss   This the form of a Ketone condition that is dangerous.   Type 1’s have to be aware of this.                                                    Guy I accept corrections or added info willingly. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Thanks for the information. I have one question: > > Sometimes an undiagnosed diabetic will suddenly find himself making > > very little insulin.  Without insulin, glucose gets blocked up in the > > blood stream and is not delivered to the cells where it is needed.  The > > cells are literally starving because they have no glucose, even though > > glucose is very close.   As glucose levels mount higher and higher, the > > kidneys begin filtering out the excessive amounts of blood glucose and > > passing it out of the body through the urine.  So the food you eat is > > literally urinated away, while your cells remain unfed. > If the glucose level mounts higher and higher, wouldn’t this show up on >the > BG meter as high readings? >Yes.  But if the diabetic is undiagnosed, it’s  not likely he or she would >even have a meter.

Response:

> Not all type 2’s are overweight.  But you see that so often in the > media you tend to believe it.

From the top of my head: I once read US figures showing that from the people with T2 67% was overweight and 46% was obese. (I guess these 46% are included in the 67% definition). So roughly 2/3th is overweight or obese. Other risk groups are people with high cholesterol levels, high blood pressure, asthma those with poor overall health and there are even differences between ethnic groups. — CeeBee

Response:

> An acquaintance of mine was dx’d T2 after steadily losing weight . What is > the connection?  Till now, I thought, that all T2 are over-weight. I’m > concerned, because I’m very low weight too. I feel good though.

        I’m sorry.  I got focused on your friend.  After rereading your post, I see that he has already been diagnosed and your concern is about your own low weight.         Being thin is not a risk factor for Type 2 diabetes.  About 90% of Type 2’s are obese/overweight.  Type 1 diabetics are usually thin, but it’s not caused by thiness.         If you’re feeling fine then there is no problem.  I posted diabetic symptoms in my last post.  Urination, thirst etc.  A sudden unexplained weight loss would be a sign that something amiss is going on, but if you’re low weight is stable then that’s probably not a problem.  Some people have low set points and are just normally thin.                         E

Response:

> An acquaintance of mine was dx’d T2 after steadily losing weight . What is > the connection?  Till now, I thought, that all T2 are over-weight. I’m > concerned, because I’m very low weight too. I feel good though.

Not all type 2’s are overweight.  But you see that so often in the media you tend to believe it. — Type 2 http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/

Response:

Thanks for the information. I have one question: > Sometimes an undiagnosed diabetic will suddenly find himself making > very little insulin.  Without insulin, glucose gets blocked up in the > blood stream and is not delivered to the cells where it is needed.  The > cells are literally starving because they have no glucose, even though > glucose is very close.   As glucose levels mount higher and higher, the > kidneys begin filtering out the excessive amounts of blood glucose and > passing it out of the body through the urine.  So the food you eat is > literally urinated away, while your cells remain unfed.

If the glucose level mounts higher and higher, wouldn’t this show up on the BG meter as high readings? Fred Henzi

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Thanks for the information. I have one question: >Sometimes an undiagnosed diabetic will suddenly find himself making >very little insulin.  Without insulin, glucose gets blocked up in the >blood stream and is not delivered to the cells where it is needed.  The >cells are literally starving because they have no glucose, even though >glucose is very close.   As glucose levels mount higher and higher, the >kidneys begin filtering out the excessive amounts of blood glucose and >passing it out of the body through the urine.  So the food you eat is >literally urinated away, while your cells remain unfed. > If the glucose level mounts higher and higher, wouldn’t this show up on the > BG meter as high readings?

        Yes.  It certainly would.         Well controlled diabetics don’t like their BG levels above, say, 180. Very badly controlled diabetics talk about bgs in the 300-400 range. Undiagnosed/untreated diabetics who are losing weight because of this process can have bgs at 600 or more.  Rarely, I’ve seen a post of a diabetic who was tested at around 1000.  These are dangerously high levels and these people are normally put in the hospital so their bgs can be lowered quickly under medical supervision.  People in this condition don’t feel good.  They’re quite sick.         That’s not to say that unexplained weight loss is only caused by diabetes.  There are other medical conditions which may do that as well.      If diabetes is involved they your friend should be plagued by thirst and frequent urination.  He would complain of being hungry most of the time.  He may have noticed he’s become suddenly more nearsighted.   And he would probably feel tired and sleepy a lot.         If you’re thinking of testing your friend, meters are easy to get.  For your friend’s situation, the easiest way would be to borrow one from a diabetic friend.  Perhaps the Education Department of your local hospital would have a meter available and be willing to do a quick test.   Beyond that you can easily buy them at any drugstore (I’m assuming you’re in the US).  Wal-Mart, Walgreens and a number of drugstores have house brand meters that cost about $9.00 which might come with 5 or 10 free test strips.  Test strips would cost about $42 for 100 or less if they sell a box of 50 strips.                 E

Response:

>An acquaintance of mine was dx’d T2 after steadily losing weight . What is >the connection?  Till now, I thought, that all T2 are over-weight.

No, all T2s aren’t overweight.  I am, and was upon diagnosis.  However, when I was asked at the ER how much I weighed, I gave them a figure 10lbs more than I actually weighed.  Seems I had lost 10 lbs while eating everything I could get my hands on trying to kill that "starving" feeling.   Bev Remove the "SpamFree" for email, please.   Join us in the Diabetic-Talk Chatroom on UnderNet /server irc.undernet.org — /join #Diabetic-Talk More info: http://www.diabetic-talk.org/

Response:

>An acquaintance of mine was dx’d T2 after steadily losing weight . What is >the connection?  Till now, I thought, that all T2 are over-weight. I’m >concerned, because I’m very low weight too. I feel good though. >Fred Henzi >67, T2  , dx’d 00, 5-10", 140 lbs.

I was dx’d also after loosing weight. In fact it was the weight loss which caused me to see the doc in the first place. I was not aware of any other problems. I did not seem to have any of the symptoms that are normaly associated withT2. I was a bit overweight at the time but not excessively for my frame but I was having a lot of pain at the top of my thighs especially when I tried to lie down on my side, which I do when going off to sleep. It became intollerable so I went to the doc thinking it was a flare up of my back problem from which I was just recovering. He examined me and then weighed me. I hadn’t bothered weighing myself for some time so have no idea what I was earlier. At the time I was 96kg’s. The doc thought I was either diabetic or had cancer. Luckily it turned out to be Diabetes. I have insulin resistance and essentially my body was not taking in the food I was eating. It was therefore starving and had started to eat itself. The pain I had was from muscle and tissue loss at the top of my thighs. My bones were almost on the surface. I know for a fact based upon documentation that I was not a diabetic in July 02 and this took place in March 03 so the tissue loss must have taken place over the months inbetween possibly over the eight months. You do not have to be overweight to be a diabetic but there are so many variable factors you cannot say 100% what is a typical diabetic trait. There will always be the exception. We are all different. There are comonalities shared by diabetics but these can only be taken as gross indicators that there might be a problem. They do not necessarily classify someone as a diabetic. I am T2 5′ 11" 174 lbs [and loosing still] 52 and I feel good also. HTH PETE Diagnosed 20/03/03 Type II D&E + Metformin + Gliclazide

Response:

> An acquaintance of mine was dx’d T2 after steadily losing weight . What is > the connection?  Till now, I thought, that all T2 are over-weight. I’m > concerned, because I’m very low weight too. I feel good though.

        You’ll probably continue to feel good.         Type 2 diabetes is usually associated with insulin resistance which causes high levels of blood insulin, which in turn usually cause weight gain.         Diabetes is a disease of carbohydrate metabolism.  Normally, after carbs are eaten, they are converted to glucose and transported by the blood system, ultimately, to all the cells in the body.   Insulin is necessary to move the glucose out of the blood stream and into the individual cells.  Once inside the cells, glucose is consumed as fuel for energy.         Sometimes an undiagnosed diabetic will suddenly find himself making very little insulin.  Without insulin, glucose gets blocked up in the blood stream and is not delivered to the cells where it is needed.  The cells are literally starving because they have no glucose, even though glucose is very close.   As glucose levels mount higher and higher, the kidneys begin filtering out the excessive amounts of blood glucose and passing it out of the body through the urine.  So the food you eat is literally urinated away, while your cells remain unfed.         Since the cells are not being fed by carbohydrate metabolism, your body turns to fat and protien metabolism for energy.  Burning stored fat for energy makes you thinner.  These patients are often identified by their complaint that they’re losing weight no matter how much they eat.         This is a potentially lethal condition.  A byproduct of fat metabolism, ketones, which are normally harmless, can build up to toxic levels in this situation.  These people are desperately ill and need treatment.         An analogy is sometimes used to illustrate this situation.  You’re at home and you’re hungry, so you order groceries.  The delivery truck drives up to your home, but there’s no one to unload the truck.  So you remain hungry and order more groceries, which arrive but are not unloaded either.  This can continue until your driveway is filled with trucks containing groceries, but you remain hungry because no groceries are delivered to you.  And because you’re starving, you lose weight.                                 E

Response:

An acquaintance of mine was dx’d T2 after steadily losing weight . What is the connection?  Till now, I thought, that all T2 are over-weight. I’m concerned, because I’m very low weight too. I feel good though. Fred Henzi 67, T2  , dx’d 00, 5-10", 140 lbs.

Response: